Cargando…
Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar |
_version_ | 1784618691246161920 |
---|---|
author | JACOB, Helder B. GONZAGA, Ariane S. TRINH, Brittany LE, Erik T. ENGLISH, Jeryl D. |
author_facet | JACOB, Helder B. GONZAGA, Ariane S. TRINH, Brittany LE, Erik T. ENGLISH, Jeryl D. |
author_sort | JACOB, Helder B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): Type 1 and Type 2. Each group received a different design (Type 1 with three bends, and Type 2 with two bends), and both were divided in four subgroups (n = 10) according to the evaluation periods: G1 = 24h, G2 = 1 week, G3 = 4 weeks, and G4 = 8 weeks. Mechanical tests were performed immediately after preactivation and at the end of each period, to evaluate force decay. The cantilevers were also scanned and the angles of the bends were measured to assess shape changes. RESULTS: Cantilever forces decayed over time. Type 1 - G1 showed less force decay than Type 2 (10.83 cN vs 17.87 cN). Type 1 cantilevers showed significant force decay only when G4 was compared to G1 (9.05 cN), G2 (11.73 cN), and G3 (9.78 cN). Type 2 cantilevers presented differences when G1 was compared to G2 (9.57 cN) and G3 (7.89 cN). Regarding to the cantilever angle closest to the bracket insertion, Type 1 cantilevers showed significant decrease for G2 (1.58°) and G4 (1.52°). CONCLUSIONS: Cantilevers’ design and proximity of the bends influenced force decay pattern overtime. Type 1 cantilevers presented more stable design at the first weeks than Type 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8690859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86908592021-12-29 Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics JACOB, Helder B. GONZAGA, Ariane S. TRINH, Brittany LE, Erik T. ENGLISH, Jeryl D. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): Type 1 and Type 2. Each group received a different design (Type 1 with three bends, and Type 2 with two bends), and both were divided in four subgroups (n = 10) according to the evaluation periods: G1 = 24h, G2 = 1 week, G3 = 4 weeks, and G4 = 8 weeks. Mechanical tests were performed immediately after preactivation and at the end of each period, to evaluate force decay. The cantilevers were also scanned and the angles of the bends were measured to assess shape changes. RESULTS: Cantilever forces decayed over time. Type 1 - G1 showed less force decay than Type 2 (10.83 cN vs 17.87 cN). Type 1 cantilevers showed significant force decay only when G4 was compared to G1 (9.05 cN), G2 (11.73 cN), and G3 (9.78 cN). Type 2 cantilevers presented differences when G1 was compared to G2 (9.57 cN) and G3 (7.89 cN). Regarding to the cantilever angle closest to the bracket insertion, Type 1 cantilevers showed significant decrease for G2 (1.58°) and G4 (1.52°). CONCLUSIONS: Cantilevers’ design and proximity of the bends influenced force decay pattern overtime. Type 1 cantilevers presented more stable design at the first weeks than Type 2. Dental Press International 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8690859/ /pubmed/34932713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article JACOB, Helder B. GONZAGA, Ariane S. TRINH, Brittany LE, Erik T. ENGLISH, Jeryl D. Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title | Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title_full | Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title_fullStr | Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title_short | Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
title_sort | effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobhelderb effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics AT gonzagaarianes effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics AT trinhbrittany effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics AT leerikt effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics AT englishjeryld effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics |