Cargando…

Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: JACOB, Helder B., GONZAGA, Ariane S., TRINH, Brittany, LE, Erik T., ENGLISH, Jeryl D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar
_version_ 1784618691246161920
author JACOB, Helder B.
GONZAGA, Ariane S.
TRINH, Brittany
LE, Erik T.
ENGLISH, Jeryl D.
author_facet JACOB, Helder B.
GONZAGA, Ariane S.
TRINH, Brittany
LE, Erik T.
ENGLISH, Jeryl D.
author_sort JACOB, Helder B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): Type 1 and Type 2. Each group received a different design (Type 1 with three bends, and Type 2 with two bends), and both were divided in four subgroups (n = 10) according to the evaluation periods: G1 = 24h, G2 = 1 week, G3 = 4 weeks, and G4 = 8 weeks. Mechanical tests were performed immediately after preactivation and at the end of each period, to evaluate force decay. The cantilevers were also scanned and the angles of the bends were measured to assess shape changes. RESULTS: Cantilever forces decayed over time. Type 1 - G1 showed less force decay than Type 2 (10.83 cN vs 17.87 cN). Type 1 cantilevers showed significant force decay only when G4 was compared to G1 (9.05 cN), G2 (11.73 cN), and G3 (9.78 cN). Type 2 cantilevers presented differences when G1 was compared to G2 (9.57 cN) and G3 (7.89 cN). Regarding to the cantilever angle closest to the bracket insertion, Type 1 cantilevers showed significant decrease for G2 (1.58°) and G4 (1.52°). CONCLUSIONS: Cantilevers’ design and proximity of the bends influenced force decay pattern overtime. Type 1 cantilevers presented more stable design at the first weeks than Type 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8690859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86908592021-12-29 Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics JACOB, Helder B. GONZAGA, Ariane S. TRINH, Brittany LE, Erik T. ENGLISH, Jeryl D. Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the force decay and design shape changes caused by stress relaxation in two different orthodontic cantilever configurations. METHODS: Eighty cantilevers made of 0.017 x 0.025-in beta-titanium wires were standardized in a passive position, using real scale templates, and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): Type 1 and Type 2. Each group received a different design (Type 1 with three bends, and Type 2 with two bends), and both were divided in four subgroups (n = 10) according to the evaluation periods: G1 = 24h, G2 = 1 week, G3 = 4 weeks, and G4 = 8 weeks. Mechanical tests were performed immediately after preactivation and at the end of each period, to evaluate force decay. The cantilevers were also scanned and the angles of the bends were measured to assess shape changes. RESULTS: Cantilever forces decayed over time. Type 1 - G1 showed less force decay than Type 2 (10.83 cN vs 17.87 cN). Type 1 cantilevers showed significant force decay only when G4 was compared to G1 (9.05 cN), G2 (11.73 cN), and G3 (9.78 cN). Type 2 cantilevers presented differences when G1 was compared to G2 (9.57 cN) and G3 (7.89 cN). Regarding to the cantilever angle closest to the bracket insertion, Type 1 cantilevers showed significant decrease for G2 (1.58°) and G4 (1.52°). CONCLUSIONS: Cantilevers’ design and proximity of the bends influenced force decay pattern overtime. Type 1 cantilevers presented more stable design at the first weeks than Type 2. Dental Press International 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8690859/ /pubmed/34932713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
JACOB, Helder B.
GONZAGA, Ariane S.
TRINH, Brittany
LE, Erik T.
ENGLISH, Jeryl D.
Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title_full Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title_fullStr Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title_short Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
title_sort effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium cantilevers used in orthodontic mechanics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212069.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobhelderb effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics
AT gonzagaarianes effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics
AT trinhbrittany effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics
AT leerikt effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics
AT englishjeryld effectsofstressrelaxationinbetatitaniumcantileversusedinorthodonticmechanics