Cargando…
Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation using propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is being utilized worldwide. However, this is not usually employed in India by endoscopists. AIM: To assess the efficacy, acceptability, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2021.111764 |
_version_ | 1784618712710512640 |
---|---|
author | Raina, Hameed Prakash, Anukalp Ashraf, Umaymah Raina, Manzoor |
author_facet | Raina, Hameed Prakash, Anukalp Ashraf, Umaymah Raina, Manzoor |
author_sort | Raina, Hameed |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Endoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation using propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is being utilized worldwide. However, this is not usually employed in India by endoscopists. AIM: To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of this sedation in low to moderate risk patients undergoing ERCP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective study involving 500 patients with any indication for ERCP. The sedation was given by trained nurses. RESULTS: The sedative dosages per patient were as follows: propofol = 90 ±20 mg, fentanyl 0.75 ±0.25 mg (range: 0.25–1.00 mg), and midazolam 2 ±0.5 mg (range: 1–3 mg). Ninety-seven percent of patients achieved Richmond agitation sedation score of ≥ –3, and 96.8% achieved Gloucester comfort score of ≤ 2. 4.22% of the patients had mild adverse events (AE), and 2.11% had moderate AE. Two (0.4%) patients required intubation and intensive care unit admission. Mean recovery time was 15.3 min. 98.3% of the endoscopists were satisfied with the sedation achieved. 31.2% of the patients remembered the procedure. 93% of the patients were satisfied with the type of sedation. 92.75% of ERCPs were successful. 7.59% had procedure-related complications: in the form PEP – 5.290%, significant bleeding – 1.08%, and perforation – 0.43%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation for ERCP with balanced propofol solution is practical, efficient, time saving, safe, and acceptable to patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8690956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86909562021-12-30 Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India Raina, Hameed Prakash, Anukalp Ashraf, Umaymah Raina, Manzoor Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Endoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation using propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is being utilized worldwide. However, this is not usually employed in India by endoscopists. AIM: To assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of this sedation in low to moderate risk patients undergoing ERCP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective study involving 500 patients with any indication for ERCP. The sedation was given by trained nurses. RESULTS: The sedative dosages per patient were as follows: propofol = 90 ±20 mg, fentanyl 0.75 ±0.25 mg (range: 0.25–1.00 mg), and midazolam 2 ±0.5 mg (range: 1–3 mg). Ninety-seven percent of patients achieved Richmond agitation sedation score of ≥ –3, and 96.8% achieved Gloucester comfort score of ≤ 2. 4.22% of the patients had mild adverse events (AE), and 2.11% had moderate AE. Two (0.4%) patients required intubation and intensive care unit admission. Mean recovery time was 15.3 min. 98.3% of the endoscopists were satisfied with the sedation achieved. 31.2% of the patients remembered the procedure. 93% of the patients were satisfied with the type of sedation. 92.75% of ERCPs were successful. 7.59% had procedure-related complications: in the form PEP – 5.290%, significant bleeding – 1.08%, and perforation – 0.43%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation for ERCP with balanced propofol solution is practical, efficient, time saving, safe, and acceptable to patients. Termedia Publishing House 2021-12-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8690956/ /pubmed/34976240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2021.111764 Text en Copyright © 2021 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Raina, Hameed Prakash, Anukalp Ashraf, Umaymah Raina, Manzoor Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title | Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title_full | Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title_fullStr | Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title_short | Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India |
title_sort | is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (bps) practical and safe? a prospective study from a tertiary care centre in india |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8690956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2021.111764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rainahameed isendoscopistdirectedsedationforendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographywithbalancedpropofolsolutionbpspracticalandsafeaprospectivestudyfromatertiarycarecentreinindia AT prakashanukalp isendoscopistdirectedsedationforendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographywithbalancedpropofolsolutionbpspracticalandsafeaprospectivestudyfromatertiarycarecentreinindia AT ashrafumaymah isendoscopistdirectedsedationforendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographywithbalancedpropofolsolutionbpspracticalandsafeaprospectivestudyfromatertiarycarecentreinindia AT rainamanzoor isendoscopistdirectedsedationforendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographywithbalancedpropofolsolutionbpspracticalandsafeaprospectivestudyfromatertiarycarecentreinindia |