Cargando…
Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative ev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551 |
_version_ | 1784618795492442112 |
---|---|
author | Moulton, Jessica E. Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez Vaughan, Cathy Bohren, Meghan A. |
author_facet | Moulton, Jessica E. Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez Vaughan, Cathy Bohren, Meghan A. |
author_sort | Moulton, Jessica E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts. METHOD: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25(th) February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden’s thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women’s different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8691598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86915982021-12-22 Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis Moulton, Jessica E. Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez Vaughan, Cathy Bohren, Meghan A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts. METHOD: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25(th) February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden’s thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women’s different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women. Public Library of Science 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8691598/ /pubmed/34932570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551 Text en © 2021 Moulton et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moulton, Jessica E. Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez Vaughan, Cathy Bohren, Meghan A. Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title | Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title_full | Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title_fullStr | Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title_short | Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
title_sort | women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moultonjessicae womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis AT coronamarthaiselavazquez womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis AT vaughancathy womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis AT bohrenmeghana womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis |