Cargando…

Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moulton, Jessica E., Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez, Vaughan, Cathy, Bohren, Meghan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551
_version_ 1784618795492442112
author Moulton, Jessica E.
Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez
Vaughan, Cathy
Bohren, Meghan A.
author_facet Moulton, Jessica E.
Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez
Vaughan, Cathy
Bohren, Meghan A.
author_sort Moulton, Jessica E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts. METHOD: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25(th) February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden’s thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women’s different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8691598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86915982021-12-22 Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis Moulton, Jessica E. Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez Vaughan, Cathy Bohren, Meghan A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Reproductive coercion and abuse is a major public health issue, with significant effects on the health and well-being of women. Reproductive coercion and abuse includes any form of behaviour that intentionally controls another person’s reproductive choices. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis is to explore women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse globally, to broaden understanding of the different ways reproductive coercion and abuse is perpetrated, perceived and experienced across settings and socio-cultural contexts. METHOD: We searched Medline, CINAHL and Embase for eligible studies from inception to 25(th) February 2021. Primary studies with a qualitative study design that focused on the experiences and perceptions of women who have encountered reproductive coercion and abuse were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts, and full texts were screened by independent reviewers. We extracted data from included studies using a form designed for this synthesis and assessed methodological limitations using CASP. We used Thomas and Harden’s thematic analysis approach to analyse and synthesise the evidence, and the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess confidence in review findings. RESULTS: We included 33 studies from twelve countries in South Asia, the Asia Pacific, North America, South America, Africa and Europe. Most studies used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to discuss women’s experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse. Reproductive coercion and abuse manifested in a range of behaviours including control of pregnancy outcome, pregnancy pressure or contraceptive sabotage. There were a range of reasons cited for reproductive coercion and abuse, including control of women, rigid gender roles, social inequalities and family pressure. Women’s different responses to reproductive coercion and abuse included using covert contraception and feelings of distress, anger and trauma. Across contexts, perpetration and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse were influenced by different factors including son preferences and social exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: We reflect on the importance of socio-cultural factors in understanding the phenomenon of reproductive coercion and abuse and how it affects women, as well as how the mechanisms of power and control at both individual and societal levels work to perpetuate the incidence of reproductive coercion and abuse against women. Public Library of Science 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8691598/ /pubmed/34932570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551 Text en © 2021 Moulton et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moulton, Jessica E.
Corona, Martha Isela Vazquez
Vaughan, Cathy
Bohren, Meghan A.
Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_full Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_fullStr Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_short Women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
title_sort women’s perceptions and experiences of reproductive coercion and abuse: a qualitative evidence synthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261551
work_keys_str_mv AT moultonjessicae womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT coronamarthaiselavazquez womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT vaughancathy womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis
AT bohrenmeghana womensperceptionsandexperiencesofreproductivecoercionandabuseaqualitativeevidencesynthesis