Cargando…
Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics
Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly not standardized in the literature. Although the measured raw acceleration signal can be diversely processed, and then the activity values can be calc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261718 |
_version_ | 1784618798638170112 |
---|---|
author | Maczák, Bálint Vadai, Gergely Dér, András Szendi, István Gingl, Zoltán |
author_facet | Maczák, Bálint Vadai, Gergely Dér, András Szendi, István Gingl, Zoltán |
author_sort | Maczák, Bálint |
collection | PubMed |
description | Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly not standardized in the literature. Although the measured raw acceleration signal can be diversely processed, and then the activity values can be calculated by different activity calculation methods, the documentations of them are generally incomplete or vary by manufacturer. These numerous activity metrics may require different types of preprocessing of the acceleration signal. For example, digital filtering of the acceleration signals can have various parameters; moreover, both the filter and the activity metrics can also be applied per axis or on the magnitudes of the acceleration vector. Level crossing-based activity metrics also depend on threshold level values, yet the determination of their exact values is unclear as well. Due to the serious inconsistency of determining activity values, we created a detailed and comprehensive comparison of the different available activity calculation procedures because, up to the present, it was lacking in the literature. We assessed the different methods by analysing the triaxial acceleration signals measured during a 10-day movement of 42 subjects. We calculated 148 different activity signals for each subject’s movement using the combinations of various types of preprocessing and 7 different activity metrics applied on both axial and magnitude data. We determined the strength of the linear relationship between the metrics by correlation analysis, while we also examined the effects of the preprocessing steps. Moreover, we established that the standard deviation of the data series can be used as an appropriate, adaptive and generalized threshold level for the level intersection-based metrics. On the basis of these results, our work also serves as a general guide on how to proceed if one wants to determine activity from the raw acceleration data. All of the analysed raw acceleration signals are also publicly available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8691611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86916112021-12-22 Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics Maczák, Bálint Vadai, Gergely Dér, András Szendi, István Gingl, Zoltán PLoS One Research Article Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly not standardized in the literature. Although the measured raw acceleration signal can be diversely processed, and then the activity values can be calculated by different activity calculation methods, the documentations of them are generally incomplete or vary by manufacturer. These numerous activity metrics may require different types of preprocessing of the acceleration signal. For example, digital filtering of the acceleration signals can have various parameters; moreover, both the filter and the activity metrics can also be applied per axis or on the magnitudes of the acceleration vector. Level crossing-based activity metrics also depend on threshold level values, yet the determination of their exact values is unclear as well. Due to the serious inconsistency of determining activity values, we created a detailed and comprehensive comparison of the different available activity calculation procedures because, up to the present, it was lacking in the literature. We assessed the different methods by analysing the triaxial acceleration signals measured during a 10-day movement of 42 subjects. We calculated 148 different activity signals for each subject’s movement using the combinations of various types of preprocessing and 7 different activity metrics applied on both axial and magnitude data. We determined the strength of the linear relationship between the metrics by correlation analysis, while we also examined the effects of the preprocessing steps. Moreover, we established that the standard deviation of the data series can be used as an appropriate, adaptive and generalized threshold level for the level intersection-based metrics. On the basis of these results, our work also serves as a general guide on how to proceed if one wants to determine activity from the raw acceleration data. All of the analysed raw acceleration signals are also publicly available. Public Library of Science 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8691611/ /pubmed/34932595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261718 Text en © 2021 Maczák et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Maczák, Bálint Vadai, Gergely Dér, András Szendi, István Gingl, Zoltán Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title | Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title_full | Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title_fullStr | Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title_full_unstemmed | Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title_short | Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
title_sort | detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maczakbalint detailedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentactivitymetrics AT vadaigergely detailedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentactivitymetrics AT derandras detailedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentactivitymetrics AT szendiistvan detailedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentactivitymetrics AT ginglzoltan detailedanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentactivitymetrics |