Cargando…

New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools

The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klump, Barbara C, St Clair, James JH, Rutz, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930523
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829
_version_ 1784618830892367872
author Klump, Barbara C
St Clair, James JH
Rutz, Christian
author_facet Klump, Barbara C
St Clair, James JH
Rutz, Christian
author_sort Klump, Barbara C
collection PubMed
description The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild-caught, temporarily captive New Caledonian crows, we investigated experimentally whether individuals prefer one tool type over the other when given a choice and whether they take better care of their preferred tools between successive episodes of use, safely storing them underfoot or in nearby holes. Crows strongly preferred hooked stick tools made from Desmanthus virgatus stems over non-hooked stick tools. Importantly, this preference was also reflected in subsequent tool-handling behaviour, with subjects keeping hooked stick tools safe more often than non-hooked stick tools sourced from leaf litter. These results suggest that crows ‘value’ hooked stick tools, which are both costlier to procure and more efficient to use, more than non-hooked stick tools. Results from a series of control treatments suggested that crows altered their tool ‘safekeeping’ behaviour in response to a combination of factors, including tool type and raw material. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use safekeeping behaviour as a proxy for assessing how non-human animals value different tool types, establishing a novel paradigm for productive cross-taxonomic comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8691834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86918342021-12-22 New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools Klump, Barbara C St Clair, James JH Rutz, Christian eLife Ecology The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild-caught, temporarily captive New Caledonian crows, we investigated experimentally whether individuals prefer one tool type over the other when given a choice and whether they take better care of their preferred tools between successive episodes of use, safely storing them underfoot or in nearby holes. Crows strongly preferred hooked stick tools made from Desmanthus virgatus stems over non-hooked stick tools. Importantly, this preference was also reflected in subsequent tool-handling behaviour, with subjects keeping hooked stick tools safe more often than non-hooked stick tools sourced from leaf litter. These results suggest that crows ‘value’ hooked stick tools, which are both costlier to procure and more efficient to use, more than non-hooked stick tools. Results from a series of control treatments suggested that crows altered their tool ‘safekeeping’ behaviour in response to a combination of factors, including tool type and raw material. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use safekeeping behaviour as a proxy for assessing how non-human animals value different tool types, establishing a novel paradigm for productive cross-taxonomic comparisons. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8691834/ /pubmed/34930523 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829 Text en © 2021, Klump et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Klump, Barbara C
St Clair, James JH
Rutz, Christian
New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title_full New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title_fullStr New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title_full_unstemmed New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title_short New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
title_sort new caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930523
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829
work_keys_str_mv AT klumpbarbarac newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools
AT stclairjamesjh newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools
AT rutzchristian newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools