Cargando…
New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools
The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930523 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829 |
_version_ | 1784618830892367872 |
---|---|
author | Klump, Barbara C St Clair, James JH Rutz, Christian |
author_facet | Klump, Barbara C St Clair, James JH Rutz, Christian |
author_sort | Klump, Barbara C |
collection | PubMed |
description | The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild-caught, temporarily captive New Caledonian crows, we investigated experimentally whether individuals prefer one tool type over the other when given a choice and whether they take better care of their preferred tools between successive episodes of use, safely storing them underfoot or in nearby holes. Crows strongly preferred hooked stick tools made from Desmanthus virgatus stems over non-hooked stick tools. Importantly, this preference was also reflected in subsequent tool-handling behaviour, with subjects keeping hooked stick tools safe more often than non-hooked stick tools sourced from leaf litter. These results suggest that crows ‘value’ hooked stick tools, which are both costlier to procure and more efficient to use, more than non-hooked stick tools. Results from a series of control treatments suggested that crows altered their tool ‘safekeeping’ behaviour in response to a combination of factors, including tool type and raw material. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use safekeeping behaviour as a proxy for assessing how non-human animals value different tool types, establishing a novel paradigm for productive cross-taxonomic comparisons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8691834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86918342021-12-22 New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools Klump, Barbara C St Clair, James JH Rutz, Christian eLife Ecology The temporary storage and re-use of tools can significantly enhance foraging efficiency. New Caledonian crows in one of our study populations use two types of stick tools – hooked and non-hooked – which differ in raw material, manufacture costs, and foraging performance. Using a large sample of wild-caught, temporarily captive New Caledonian crows, we investigated experimentally whether individuals prefer one tool type over the other when given a choice and whether they take better care of their preferred tools between successive episodes of use, safely storing them underfoot or in nearby holes. Crows strongly preferred hooked stick tools made from Desmanthus virgatus stems over non-hooked stick tools. Importantly, this preference was also reflected in subsequent tool-handling behaviour, with subjects keeping hooked stick tools safe more often than non-hooked stick tools sourced from leaf litter. These results suggest that crows ‘value’ hooked stick tools, which are both costlier to procure and more efficient to use, more than non-hooked stick tools. Results from a series of control treatments suggested that crows altered their tool ‘safekeeping’ behaviour in response to a combination of factors, including tool type and raw material. To our knowledge, our study is the first to use safekeeping behaviour as a proxy for assessing how non-human animals value different tool types, establishing a novel paradigm for productive cross-taxonomic comparisons. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8691834/ /pubmed/34930523 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829 Text en © 2021, Klump et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Ecology Klump, Barbara C St Clair, James JH Rutz, Christian New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title | New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title_full | New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title_fullStr | New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title_full_unstemmed | New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title_short | New Caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
title_sort | new caledonian crows keep ‘valuable’ hooked tools safer than basic non-hooked tools |
topic | Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930523 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klumpbarbarac newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools AT stclairjamesjh newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools AT rutzchristian newcaledoniancrowskeepvaluablehookedtoolssaferthanbasicnonhookedtools |