Cargando…
Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool
BACKGROUND: Child stunting is a critical global health issue. Guatemala has one of the world's highest levels of stunting despite the sustained commitment to international nutrition policy best practices endorsed by the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) movement. Our objective was to use Guatemala as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933973 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00585 |
_version_ | 1784618840279220224 |
---|---|
author | Tschida, Scott Cordon, Ana Asturias, Gabriela Mazariegos, Mónica Kroker-Lobos, María F. Jackson, Bianca Rohloff, Peter Flood, David |
author_facet | Tschida, Scott Cordon, Ana Asturias, Gabriela Mazariegos, Mónica Kroker-Lobos, María F. Jackson, Bianca Rohloff, Peter Flood, David |
author_sort | Tschida, Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Child stunting is a critical global health issue. Guatemala has one of the world's highest levels of stunting despite the sustained commitment to international nutrition policy best practices endorsed by the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) movement. Our objective was to use Guatemala as a case study to project the impact of a recently published national nutrition policy, the Great Crusade, that is consistent with SUN principles. METHODS: We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to project the impact of scaling-up of nutrition interventions proposed in the Great Crusade and recommended by SUN. Our outcomes were changes in stunting prevalence, number of stunting cases averted, and number of cases averted by intervention in children under 5 years of age from 2020 to 2030. We considered 4 scenarios: (1) intervention coverage continues based on historical trends, (2) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved, (3) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved with reduced fertility risk, and (4) coverage reaches an aspirational level. RESULTS: All scenarios led to modest reductions in stunting prevalence. In 2024, stunting prevalence was estimated to change by −0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.0%,−0.2%) if historical trends continue, −1.1% (95% CI=−0.8%,−1.5%) in the Great Crusade scenario, and −2.2% (95% CI=−1.6%,−3.0%) in the aspirational scenario. In 2030, we projected a stunting prevalence of −0.4% (95% CI=−0.2%,−0.8%) and −3.7% (95% CI=−2.8%,−5.1%) in the historical trends and aspirational scenario, respectively. Complementary feeding, sanitation, and breastfeeding were the highest-impact interventions across models. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted reductions in child stunting prevalence in Guatemala are unlikely to be achieved solely based on increases in intervention coverage. Our results show the limitations of current paradigms recommended by the international nutrition community. Policies and strategies are needed to address the broader structural drivers of stunting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8691882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86918822021-12-31 Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool Tschida, Scott Cordon, Ana Asturias, Gabriela Mazariegos, Mónica Kroker-Lobos, María F. Jackson, Bianca Rohloff, Peter Flood, David Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: Child stunting is a critical global health issue. Guatemala has one of the world's highest levels of stunting despite the sustained commitment to international nutrition policy best practices endorsed by the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) movement. Our objective was to use Guatemala as a case study to project the impact of a recently published national nutrition policy, the Great Crusade, that is consistent with SUN principles. METHODS: We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to project the impact of scaling-up of nutrition interventions proposed in the Great Crusade and recommended by SUN. Our outcomes were changes in stunting prevalence, number of stunting cases averted, and number of cases averted by intervention in children under 5 years of age from 2020 to 2030. We considered 4 scenarios: (1) intervention coverage continues based on historical trends, (2) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved, (3) coverage targets in the Great Crusade are achieved with reduced fertility risk, and (4) coverage reaches an aspirational level. RESULTS: All scenarios led to modest reductions in stunting prevalence. In 2024, stunting prevalence was estimated to change by −0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.0%,−0.2%) if historical trends continue, −1.1% (95% CI=−0.8%,−1.5%) in the Great Crusade scenario, and −2.2% (95% CI=−1.6%,−3.0%) in the aspirational scenario. In 2030, we projected a stunting prevalence of −0.4% (95% CI=−0.2%,−0.8%) and −3.7% (95% CI=−2.8%,−5.1%) in the historical trends and aspirational scenario, respectively. Complementary feeding, sanitation, and breastfeeding were the highest-impact interventions across models. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted reductions in child stunting prevalence in Guatemala are unlikely to be achieved solely based on increases in intervention coverage. Our results show the limitations of current paradigms recommended by the international nutrition community. Policies and strategies are needed to address the broader structural drivers of stunting. Global Health: Science and Practice 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8691882/ /pubmed/34933973 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00585 Text en © Tschida et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00585 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tschida, Scott Cordon, Ana Asturias, Gabriela Mazariegos, Mónica Kroker-Lobos, María F. Jackson, Bianca Rohloff, Peter Flood, David Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title | Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title_full | Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title_fullStr | Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title_short | Projecting the Impact of Nutrition Policy to Improve Child Stunting: A Case Study in Guatemala Using the Lives Saved Tool |
title_sort | projecting the impact of nutrition policy to improve child stunting: a case study in guatemala using the lives saved tool |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933973 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tschidascott projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT cordonana projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT asturiasgabriela projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT mazariegosmonica projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT krokerlobosmariaf projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT jacksonbianca projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT rohloffpeter projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool AT flooddavid projectingtheimpactofnutritionpolicytoimprovechildstuntingacasestudyinguatemalausingthelivessavedtool |