Cargando…

Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Recent increases in fertility rates in Egypt and an increase in desired fertility among unmarried young people highlight the need for renewed attention to awareness of and demand for family planning (FP) among young people. Between 2017 and 2018, the United States Agency for International Developmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tawab, Nahla Abdel, Tobey, Elizabeth, Essam, Maryam, Dwyer, Sara Chace, Jain, Aparna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933977
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00124
_version_ 1784618841689554944
author Tawab, Nahla Abdel
Tobey, Elizabeth
Essam, Maryam
Dwyer, Sara Chace
Jain, Aparna
author_facet Tawab, Nahla Abdel
Tobey, Elizabeth
Essam, Maryam
Dwyer, Sara Chace
Jain, Aparna
author_sort Tawab, Nahla Abdel
collection PubMed
description Recent increases in fertility rates in Egypt and an increase in desired fertility among unmarried young people highlight the need for renewed attention to awareness of and demand for family planning (FP) among young people. Between 2017 and 2018, the United States Agency for International Development-funded Evidence Project tested 2 intervention models to increase awareness of and demand for FP and reproductive health (RH) services among people aged 18–35 years in Souhag and Port Said governorates, Egypt. In Souhag, FP/RH information was integrated into a 5-day livelihood training program for job seekers. In Port Said, garment factory workers received FP/RH information through trained peer educators, social and behavior change materials, and social media. Workshop participants and factory workers interested in FP services were referred to private project-trained physicians and pharmacists. We present the results of an evaluation of the impact of each intervention on young people's reported exposure to FP messages and their FP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Phone interviews were conducted with participants in intervention and comparison groups before and after the intervention. In Souhag, 1,519 intervention group participants (778 at baseline; 741 at endline) and 1,082 comparison group participants (699 at baseline; 383 at endline) completed the phone interview. In Port Said 1,958 participants from intervention factories (1,145 at baseline; 813 at endline) and 1,047 participants from comparison factories (621 at baseline; 426 at endline) completed the phone interview. A difference-in-differences analysis compared intervention and comparison groups between baseline and endline. Results showed significant differences in knowledge and attitudes over time between the intervention and comparison groups in Souhag but less so in Port Said. FP use did not change among project participants in either governorate. We discuss lessons learned from integrating FP into worker health and livelihood training programs and methodological considerations for evaluating such interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8691888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86918882021-12-31 Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis Tawab, Nahla Abdel Tobey, Elizabeth Essam, Maryam Dwyer, Sara Chace Jain, Aparna Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article Recent increases in fertility rates in Egypt and an increase in desired fertility among unmarried young people highlight the need for renewed attention to awareness of and demand for family planning (FP) among young people. Between 2017 and 2018, the United States Agency for International Development-funded Evidence Project tested 2 intervention models to increase awareness of and demand for FP and reproductive health (RH) services among people aged 18–35 years in Souhag and Port Said governorates, Egypt. In Souhag, FP/RH information was integrated into a 5-day livelihood training program for job seekers. In Port Said, garment factory workers received FP/RH information through trained peer educators, social and behavior change materials, and social media. Workshop participants and factory workers interested in FP services were referred to private project-trained physicians and pharmacists. We present the results of an evaluation of the impact of each intervention on young people's reported exposure to FP messages and their FP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Phone interviews were conducted with participants in intervention and comparison groups before and after the intervention. In Souhag, 1,519 intervention group participants (778 at baseline; 741 at endline) and 1,082 comparison group participants (699 at baseline; 383 at endline) completed the phone interview. In Port Said 1,958 participants from intervention factories (1,145 at baseline; 813 at endline) and 1,047 participants from comparison factories (621 at baseline; 426 at endline) completed the phone interview. A difference-in-differences analysis compared intervention and comparison groups between baseline and endline. Results showed significant differences in knowledge and attitudes over time between the intervention and comparison groups in Souhag but less so in Port Said. FP use did not change among project participants in either governorate. We discuss lessons learned from integrating FP into worker health and livelihood training programs and methodological considerations for evaluating such interventions. Global Health: Science and Practice 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8691888/ /pubmed/34933977 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00124 Text en © Abdel Tawab et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00124
spellingShingle Original Article
Tawab, Nahla Abdel
Tobey, Elizabeth
Essam, Maryam
Dwyer, Sara Chace
Jain, Aparna
Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title_full Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title_short Evaluation of 2 Intervention Models to Integrate Family Planning Into Worker Health and Livelihood Programs in Egypt: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
title_sort evaluation of 2 intervention models to integrate family planning into worker health and livelihood programs in egypt: a difference-in-differences analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933977
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00124
work_keys_str_mv AT tawabnahlaabdel evaluationof2interventionmodelstointegratefamilyplanningintoworkerhealthandlivelihoodprogramsinegyptadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT tobeyelizabeth evaluationof2interventionmodelstointegratefamilyplanningintoworkerhealthandlivelihoodprogramsinegyptadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT essammaryam evaluationof2interventionmodelstointegratefamilyplanningintoworkerhealthandlivelihoodprogramsinegyptadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT dwyersarachace evaluationof2interventionmodelstointegratefamilyplanningintoworkerhealthandlivelihoodprogramsinegyptadifferenceindifferencesanalysis
AT jainaparna evaluationof2interventionmodelstointegratefamilyplanningintoworkerhealthandlivelihoodprogramsinegyptadifferenceindifferencesanalysis