Cargando…

Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES: There have been reports of postoperative conduction disturbances after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Our objective was to assess electrocardiogram changes in patients undergoing this procedure and review the literature on this topic. METHODS: In this retrospective case serie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thuraisingam, Amalan, Newcomb, Andrew E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.029
_version_ 1784618854329090048
author Thuraisingam, Amalan
Newcomb, Andrew E.
author_facet Thuraisingam, Amalan
Newcomb, Andrew E.
author_sort Thuraisingam, Amalan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There have been reports of postoperative conduction disturbances after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Our objective was to assess electrocardiogram changes in patients undergoing this procedure and review the literature on this topic. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, clinical data were extracted from patient records at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the Australia New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database. Electrocardiogram data were obtained at baseline and postoperatively on day 5 and at week 6 and reviewed for rhythm disturbances and intracardiac conduction problems. Pacemaker status was also recorded. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, 100 consecutive patients underwent rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with 1 valve type at our institution. Three patients were excluded because of paced rhythm preoperatively, leaving 97 patients (mean age 74.7 ± 8.12 years; 56.7% male) for analysis. Some 18.6% of patients developed new left bundle branch block at 5 days postoperatively and only 4.1% of patients found with persistent left bundle branch block at 6-week follow-up compared with preoperatively. No significant changes were observed in the frequencies of atrial fibrillation, first-degree heart block, and right bundle branch block. However, there was evidence of increases in paced rhythm and subsequent need for a permanent pacemaker. A total of 14 patients (14.4%) had a permanent pacemaker implanted at an average of 11.1 ± 2.9 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Rhythm disturbances and conduction abnormalities are noted with the rapid-deployment aortic valves used at our institution, but appear comparable to other rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement bioprostheses. These abnormalities may be related to the effect of the sub-annular stent frame of the valve system and implantation technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8691943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86919432022-01-03 Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement Thuraisingam, Amalan Newcomb, Andrew E. JTCVS Tech Adult: Aortic Valve: Evolving Technology OBJECTIVES: There have been reports of postoperative conduction disturbances after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Our objective was to assess electrocardiogram changes in patients undergoing this procedure and review the literature on this topic. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, clinical data were extracted from patient records at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the Australia New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database. Electrocardiogram data were obtained at baseline and postoperatively on day 5 and at week 6 and reviewed for rhythm disturbances and intracardiac conduction problems. Pacemaker status was also recorded. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, 100 consecutive patients underwent rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with 1 valve type at our institution. Three patients were excluded because of paced rhythm preoperatively, leaving 97 patients (mean age 74.7 ± 8.12 years; 56.7% male) for analysis. Some 18.6% of patients developed new left bundle branch block at 5 days postoperatively and only 4.1% of patients found with persistent left bundle branch block at 6-week follow-up compared with preoperatively. No significant changes were observed in the frequencies of atrial fibrillation, first-degree heart block, and right bundle branch block. However, there was evidence of increases in paced rhythm and subsequent need for a permanent pacemaker. A total of 14 patients (14.4%) had a permanent pacemaker implanted at an average of 11.1 ± 2.9 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Rhythm disturbances and conduction abnormalities are noted with the rapid-deployment aortic valves used at our institution, but appear comparable to other rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement bioprostheses. These abnormalities may be related to the effect of the sub-annular stent frame of the valve system and implantation technique. Elsevier 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8691943/ /pubmed/34984381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.029 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Aortic Valve: Evolving Technology
Thuraisingam, Amalan
Newcomb, Andrew E.
Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title_full Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title_short Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
title_sort rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
topic Adult: Aortic Valve: Evolving Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.029
work_keys_str_mv AT thuraisingamamalan rhythmdisturbancesfollowingrapiddeploymentaorticvalvereplacement
AT newcombandrewe rhythmdisturbancesfollowingrapiddeploymentaorticvalvereplacement