Cargando…

Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer

Conventional deep learning (DL) algorithm requires full supervision of annotating the region of interest (ROI) that is laborious and often biased. We aimed to develop a weakly-supervised DL algorithm that diagnosis breast cancer at ultrasound without image annotation. Weakly-supervised DL algorithms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jaeil, Kim, Hye Jung, Kim, Chanho, Lee, Jin Hwa, Kim, Keum Won, Park, Young Mi, Kim, Hye Won, Ki, So Yeon, Kim, You Me, Kim, Won Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03806-7
_version_ 1784618946734850048
author Kim, Jaeil
Kim, Hye Jung
Kim, Chanho
Lee, Jin Hwa
Kim, Keum Won
Park, Young Mi
Kim, Hye Won
Ki, So Yeon
Kim, You Me
Kim, Won Hwa
author_facet Kim, Jaeil
Kim, Hye Jung
Kim, Chanho
Lee, Jin Hwa
Kim, Keum Won
Park, Young Mi
Kim, Hye Won
Ki, So Yeon
Kim, You Me
Kim, Won Hwa
author_sort Kim, Jaeil
collection PubMed
description Conventional deep learning (DL) algorithm requires full supervision of annotating the region of interest (ROI) that is laborious and often biased. We aimed to develop a weakly-supervised DL algorithm that diagnosis breast cancer at ultrasound without image annotation. Weakly-supervised DL algorithms were implemented with three networks (VGG16, ResNet34, and GoogLeNet) and trained using 1000 unannotated US images (500 benign and 500 malignant masses). Two sets of 200 images (100 benign and 100 malignant masses) were used for internal and external validation sets. For comparison with fully-supervised algorithms, ROI annotation was performed manually and automatically. Diagnostic performances were calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Using the class activation map, we determined how accurately the weakly-supervised DL algorithms localized the breast masses. For internal validation sets, the weakly-supervised DL algorithms achieved excellent diagnostic performances, with AUC values of 0.92–0.96, which were not statistically different (all Ps > 0.05) from those of fully-supervised DL algorithms with either manual or automated ROI annotation (AUC, 0.92–0.96). For external validation sets, the weakly-supervised DL algorithms achieved AUC values of 0.86–0.90, which were not statistically different (Ps > 0.05) or higher (P = 0.04, VGG16 with automated ROI annotation) from those of fully-supervised DL algorithms (AUC, 0.84–0.92). In internal and external validation sets, weakly-supervised algorithms could localize 100% of malignant masses, except for ResNet34 (98%). The weakly-supervised DL algorithms developed in the present study were feasible for US diagnosis of breast cancer with well-performing localization and differential diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8692405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86924052021-12-22 Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer Kim, Jaeil Kim, Hye Jung Kim, Chanho Lee, Jin Hwa Kim, Keum Won Park, Young Mi Kim, Hye Won Ki, So Yeon Kim, You Me Kim, Won Hwa Sci Rep Article Conventional deep learning (DL) algorithm requires full supervision of annotating the region of interest (ROI) that is laborious and often biased. We aimed to develop a weakly-supervised DL algorithm that diagnosis breast cancer at ultrasound without image annotation. Weakly-supervised DL algorithms were implemented with three networks (VGG16, ResNet34, and GoogLeNet) and trained using 1000 unannotated US images (500 benign and 500 malignant masses). Two sets of 200 images (100 benign and 100 malignant masses) were used for internal and external validation sets. For comparison with fully-supervised algorithms, ROI annotation was performed manually and automatically. Diagnostic performances were calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Using the class activation map, we determined how accurately the weakly-supervised DL algorithms localized the breast masses. For internal validation sets, the weakly-supervised DL algorithms achieved excellent diagnostic performances, with AUC values of 0.92–0.96, which were not statistically different (all Ps > 0.05) from those of fully-supervised DL algorithms with either manual or automated ROI annotation (AUC, 0.92–0.96). For external validation sets, the weakly-supervised DL algorithms achieved AUC values of 0.86–0.90, which were not statistically different (Ps > 0.05) or higher (P = 0.04, VGG16 with automated ROI annotation) from those of fully-supervised DL algorithms (AUC, 0.84–0.92). In internal and external validation sets, weakly-supervised algorithms could localize 100% of malignant masses, except for ResNet34 (98%). The weakly-supervised DL algorithms developed in the present study were feasible for US diagnosis of breast cancer with well-performing localization and differential diagnosis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8692405/ /pubmed/34934144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03806-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Jaeil
Kim, Hye Jung
Kim, Chanho
Lee, Jin Hwa
Kim, Keum Won
Park, Young Mi
Kim, Hye Won
Ki, So Yeon
Kim, You Me
Kim, Won Hwa
Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title_full Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title_fullStr Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title_short Weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
title_sort weakly-supervised deep learning for ultrasound diagnosis of breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03806-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaeil weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimhyejung weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimchanho weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT leejinhwa weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimkeumwon weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT parkyoungmi weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimhyewon weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kisoyeon weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimyoume weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer
AT kimwonhwa weaklysuperviseddeeplearningforultrasounddiagnosisofbreastcancer