Cargando…
Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0 |
_version_ | 1784618947686957056 |
---|---|
author | Hartrampf, Bonnie Jochheim, David Steffen, Julius Czermak, Thomas Sadoni, Sebastian Lemmermöhle, Erik Klier, Ina Estner, Heidi L. Massberg, Steffen Mehilli, Julinda Lackermair, Korbinian Fichtner, Stephanie |
author_facet | Hartrampf, Bonnie Jochheim, David Steffen, Julius Czermak, Thomas Sadoni, Sebastian Lemmermöhle, Erik Klier, Ina Estner, Heidi L. Massberg, Steffen Mehilli, Julinda Lackermair, Korbinian Fichtner, Stephanie |
author_sort | Hartrampf, Bonnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp ≥ 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8–14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1–17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates ≥ 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms ± 17 ms vs. 144 ms ± 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8692410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86924102021-12-22 Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation Hartrampf, Bonnie Jochheim, David Steffen, Julius Czermak, Thomas Sadoni, Sebastian Lemmermöhle, Erik Klier, Ina Estner, Heidi L. Massberg, Steffen Mehilli, Julinda Lackermair, Korbinian Fichtner, Stephanie Sci Rep Article Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp ≥ 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8–14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1–17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates ≥ 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms ± 17 ms vs. 144 ms ± 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8692410/ /pubmed/34934073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hartrampf, Bonnie Jochheim, David Steffen, Julius Czermak, Thomas Sadoni, Sebastian Lemmermöhle, Erik Klier, Ina Estner, Heidi L. Massberg, Steffen Mehilli, Julinda Lackermair, Korbinian Fichtner, Stephanie Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title | Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full | Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_fullStr | Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_short | Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
title_sort | permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartrampfbonnie permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT jochheimdavid permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT steffenjulius permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT czermakthomas permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT sadonisebastian permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT lemmermohleerik permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT klierina permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT estnerheidil permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT massbergsteffen permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT mehillijulinda permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT lackermairkorbinian permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation AT fichtnerstephanie permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation |