Cargando…

Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartrampf, Bonnie, Jochheim, David, Steffen, Julius, Czermak, Thomas, Sadoni, Sebastian, Lemmermöhle, Erik, Klier, Ina, Estner, Heidi L., Massberg, Steffen, Mehilli, Julinda, Lackermair, Korbinian, Fichtner, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0
_version_ 1784618947686957056
author Hartrampf, Bonnie
Jochheim, David
Steffen, Julius
Czermak, Thomas
Sadoni, Sebastian
Lemmermöhle, Erik
Klier, Ina
Estner, Heidi L.
Massberg, Steffen
Mehilli, Julinda
Lackermair, Korbinian
Fichtner, Stephanie
author_facet Hartrampf, Bonnie
Jochheim, David
Steffen, Julius
Czermak, Thomas
Sadoni, Sebastian
Lemmermöhle, Erik
Klier, Ina
Estner, Heidi L.
Massberg, Steffen
Mehilli, Julinda
Lackermair, Korbinian
Fichtner, Stephanie
author_sort Hartrampf, Bonnie
collection PubMed
description Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp ≥ 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8–14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1–17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates ≥ 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms ± 17 ms vs. 144 ms ± 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8692410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86924102021-12-22 Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation Hartrampf, Bonnie Jochheim, David Steffen, Julius Czermak, Thomas Sadoni, Sebastian Lemmermöhle, Erik Klier, Ina Estner, Heidi L. Massberg, Steffen Mehilli, Julinda Lackermair, Korbinian Fichtner, Stephanie Sci Rep Article Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp ≥ 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8–14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1–17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates ≥ 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms ± 17 ms vs. 144 ms ± 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8692410/ /pubmed/34934073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hartrampf, Bonnie
Jochheim, David
Steffen, Julius
Czermak, Thomas
Sadoni, Sebastian
Lemmermöhle, Erik
Klier, Ina
Estner, Heidi L.
Massberg, Steffen
Mehilli, Julinda
Lackermair, Korbinian
Fichtner, Stephanie
Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_fullStr Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_short Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
title_sort permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03667-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hartrampfbonnie permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT jochheimdavid permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT steffenjulius permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT czermakthomas permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT sadonisebastian permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT lemmermohleerik permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT klierina permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT estnerheidil permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT massbergsteffen permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT mehillijulinda permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT lackermairkorbinian permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT fichtnerstephanie permanentpacemakerdependencyinpatientswithnewleftbundlebranchblockandnewfirstdegreeatrioventricularblockaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation