Cargando…

The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy

Objectives: Starting from April 2017, the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has approved new criteria for defining any new medicinal product with an innovative indication. The purpose of the study is to analyze the activity of innovativeness evaluation according to the new approach, to estimate the wei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortinguerra, Filomena, Perna, Serena, Marini, Roberto, Dell'Utri, Alessandra, Trapanese, Maurizio, Trotta, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34957163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.793640
_version_ 1784618980610146304
author Fortinguerra, Filomena
Perna, Serena
Marini, Roberto
Dell'Utri, Alessandra
Trapanese, Maurizio
Trotta, Francesco
author_facet Fortinguerra, Filomena
Perna, Serena
Marini, Roberto
Dell'Utri, Alessandra
Trapanese, Maurizio
Trotta, Francesco
author_sort Fortinguerra, Filomena
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Starting from April 2017, the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has approved new criteria for defining any new medicinal product with an innovative indication. The purpose of the study is to analyze the activity of innovativeness evaluation according to the new approach, to estimate the weight of each criterion considered for innovativeness definition, and to evaluate how the new approach works in terms of consistency and reproducibility. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the final reports evaluating the drug innovativeness assessment published on the AIFA's website between April 2017 and January 2021. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, whether the conditions were respected, or Fisher's exact test was used to explore the association between characteristics of drugs and the innovativeness status and the association between the three criteria. Profiles of the decision process and their relationship with innovativeness response were described. In order to evaluate the weight of each criterion in predicting the innovativeness status, a Classification Tree (CT) algorithm was applied. Results: Overall, of the 109 published drugs reports, 37 (33.9%) were recognized as fully innovative, 29 (26.6%) were considered conditionally innovative, while for 43 (39.4%) reports innovativeness was not recognized. Considering the three criteria of the decision process, the added therapeutic value was the only criterion statistically associated with a drug's degree of innovation (p < 0.001). The therapeutic need and the quality of clinical evidence were statistically associated (p = 0.008) even if only a mild association was observed. The added therapeutic value was the most important variable in predicting the innovativeness status according to the classification tree (CT) model applied, achieving an accuracy of 89.4%. No difference was found between orphans and non-orphan drugs or oncological and non-oncological drugs. Discussion: The added therapeutic value is the most important criterion of the multidimensional approach for the innovativeness status definition of a new medical product. A mild association was found between the therapeutic need and the quality of evidence. Overall, similar decision profiles bring the same evaluation of innovativeness status, indicating a good consistency and reproducibility between decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8692651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86926512021-12-23 The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy Fortinguerra, Filomena Perna, Serena Marini, Roberto Dell'Utri, Alessandra Trapanese, Maurizio Trotta, Francesco Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Objectives: Starting from April 2017, the Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has approved new criteria for defining any new medicinal product with an innovative indication. The purpose of the study is to analyze the activity of innovativeness evaluation according to the new approach, to estimate the weight of each criterion considered for innovativeness definition, and to evaluate how the new approach works in terms of consistency and reproducibility. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the final reports evaluating the drug innovativeness assessment published on the AIFA's website between April 2017 and January 2021. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, whether the conditions were respected, or Fisher's exact test was used to explore the association between characteristics of drugs and the innovativeness status and the association between the three criteria. Profiles of the decision process and their relationship with innovativeness response were described. In order to evaluate the weight of each criterion in predicting the innovativeness status, a Classification Tree (CT) algorithm was applied. Results: Overall, of the 109 published drugs reports, 37 (33.9%) were recognized as fully innovative, 29 (26.6%) were considered conditionally innovative, while for 43 (39.4%) reports innovativeness was not recognized. Considering the three criteria of the decision process, the added therapeutic value was the only criterion statistically associated with a drug's degree of innovation (p < 0.001). The therapeutic need and the quality of clinical evidence were statistically associated (p = 0.008) even if only a mild association was observed. The added therapeutic value was the most important variable in predicting the innovativeness status according to the classification tree (CT) model applied, achieving an accuracy of 89.4%. No difference was found between orphans and non-orphan drugs or oncological and non-oncological drugs. Discussion: The added therapeutic value is the most important criterion of the multidimensional approach for the innovativeness status definition of a new medical product. A mild association was found between the therapeutic need and the quality of evidence. Overall, similar decision profiles bring the same evaluation of innovativeness status, indicating a good consistency and reproducibility between decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8692651/ /pubmed/34957163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.793640 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fortinguerra, Perna, Marini, Dell'Utri, Trapanese, Trotta and Scientific & Technical Committee (Commissione Tecnico-Scientifica, CTS) of Italian Medicines Agency-AIFA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Fortinguerra, Filomena
Perna, Serena
Marini, Roberto
Dell'Utri, Alessandra
Trapanese, Maurizio
Trotta, Francesco
The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title_full The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title_fullStr The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title_full_unstemmed The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title_short The Assessment of the Innovativeness of a New Medicine in Italy
title_sort assessment of the innovativeness of a new medicine in italy
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34957163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.793640
work_keys_str_mv AT fortinguerrafilomena theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT pernaserena theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT mariniroberto theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT dellutrialessandra theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT trapanesemaurizio theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT trottafrancesco theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT theassessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT fortinguerrafilomena assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT pernaserena assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT mariniroberto assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT dellutrialessandra assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT trapanesemaurizio assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT trottafrancesco assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly
AT assessmentoftheinnovativenessofanewmedicineinitaly