Cargando…

Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia

We quantified the potential impact of different social distancing and self-isolation scenarios on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic trajectory in Saudi Arabia and compared the modelling results to the confirmed epidemic trajectory. Using the susceptible, exposed, infected, quarantined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AlJohani, Naif I., Mutai, Kipkoech
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002612
_version_ 1784619019816402944
author AlJohani, Naif I.
Mutai, Kipkoech
author_facet AlJohani, Naif I.
Mutai, Kipkoech
author_sort AlJohani, Naif I.
collection PubMed
description We quantified the potential impact of different social distancing and self-isolation scenarios on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic trajectory in Saudi Arabia and compared the modelling results to the confirmed epidemic trajectory. Using the susceptible, exposed, infected, quarantined and self-isolated, requiring hospitalisation, recovered/immune individuals, fatalities model, we assessed the impact of a non-pharmacological interventions’ subset. An unmitigated scenario (baseline), mitigation scenarios (25% reduction in social contact/twofold increase in self-isolation) and enhanced mitigation scenarios (50% reduction in social contact/twofold increase in self-isolation) were assessed and compared to the actual epidemic trajectory. For the unmitigated scenario, mitigation scenarios, enhanced mitigation scenarios and actual observed epidemic, the peak daily incidence rates (per 10 000 population) were 77.00, 16.00, 9.00 and 1.14 on days 71, 54, 35 and 136, respectively. The peak fatality rates were 35.00, 13.00, 5.00 and 0.016 on days 150, 125, 60 and 155, respectively. The R0 was 1.15, 1.14, 1.22 and 2.50, respectively. Aggressive implementation of social distancing and self-isolation contributed to the downward trend of the disease. We recommend using extensive models that comprehensively consider the natural history of COVID-19, social and behavioural patterns, age-specific data, actual network topology and population to elucidate the epidemic's magnitude and trajectory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8692846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86928462021-12-22 Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia AlJohani, Naif I. Mutai, Kipkoech Epidemiol Infect Original Paper We quantified the potential impact of different social distancing and self-isolation scenarios on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic trajectory in Saudi Arabia and compared the modelling results to the confirmed epidemic trajectory. Using the susceptible, exposed, infected, quarantined and self-isolated, requiring hospitalisation, recovered/immune individuals, fatalities model, we assessed the impact of a non-pharmacological interventions’ subset. An unmitigated scenario (baseline), mitigation scenarios (25% reduction in social contact/twofold increase in self-isolation) and enhanced mitigation scenarios (50% reduction in social contact/twofold increase in self-isolation) were assessed and compared to the actual epidemic trajectory. For the unmitigated scenario, mitigation scenarios, enhanced mitigation scenarios and actual observed epidemic, the peak daily incidence rates (per 10 000 population) were 77.00, 16.00, 9.00 and 1.14 on days 71, 54, 35 and 136, respectively. The peak fatality rates were 35.00, 13.00, 5.00 and 0.016 on days 150, 125, 60 and 155, respectively. The R0 was 1.15, 1.14, 1.22 and 2.50, respectively. Aggressive implementation of social distancing and self-isolation contributed to the downward trend of the disease. We recommend using extensive models that comprehensively consider the natural history of COVID-19, social and behavioural patterns, age-specific data, actual network topology and population to elucidate the epidemic's magnitude and trajectory. Cambridge University Press 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8692846/ /pubmed/34839841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002612 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
AlJohani, Naif I.
Mutai, Kipkoech
Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title_full Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title_short Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic in Saudi Arabia
title_sort effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the covid-19 epidemic in saudi arabia
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34839841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002612
work_keys_str_mv AT aljohaninaifi effectofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonthecovid19epidemicinsaudiarabia
AT mutaikipkoech effectofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonthecovid19epidemicinsaudiarabia