Cargando…

Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury

Nerve injury resulting in muscle paralysis from trauma or surgery is a major medical problem. Repair of such injuries with existing nerve grafting and reconstructive techniques often results in less than optimal outcomes. After previously demonstrating significant return of function using muscle-ner...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charous, Steven J., Hutz, Michael J., Bialek, Samantha E., Schumacher, Jane K., Foecking, Eileen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.723024
_version_ 1784619023352201216
author Charous, Steven J.
Hutz, Michael J.
Bialek, Samantha E.
Schumacher, Jane K.
Foecking, Eileen M.
author_facet Charous, Steven J.
Hutz, Michael J.
Bialek, Samantha E.
Schumacher, Jane K.
Foecking, Eileen M.
author_sort Charous, Steven J.
collection PubMed
description Nerve injury resulting in muscle paralysis from trauma or surgery is a major medical problem. Repair of such injuries with existing nerve grafting and reconstructive techniques often results in less than optimal outcomes. After previously demonstrating significant return of function using muscle-nerve-muscle (MNM) grafting in a rat facial nerve model, this study compares a variant of the technique, muscle-nerve-nerve (MNN) neurotization to MNM and interposition (IP) nerve grafting. Thirty male rats were randomized into four groups (1) control with no intervention, (2) repair with IP grafts, (3) MNM grafts and (4) MNN grafts. All groups had the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the right facial nerve resected. Return of vibrissae movement, orientation, and snout symmetry was measured over 16 weeks. Functional recovery and muscle atrophy were assessed and quantified. All interventions resulted in significant improvement in vibrissae movement and orientation as compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The MNM and MNN groups had significantly less time to forward vibrissae movement as compared to controls (p < 0.05), and a large number of animals in the MNN group had coordinated vibrissae movement at 16 weeks. MNN and IP grafts retained significantly more muscle mass as compared to control (p < 0.05). Thus, MNN grafting is a promising adjuvant or alternative technique for reanimation for patients with unilateral peripheral nerve injury who are not candidates for primary neurorrhaphy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8692869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86928692021-12-23 Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury Charous, Steven J. Hutz, Michael J. Bialek, Samantha E. Schumacher, Jane K. Foecking, Eileen M. Front Neurol Neurology Nerve injury resulting in muscle paralysis from trauma or surgery is a major medical problem. Repair of such injuries with existing nerve grafting and reconstructive techniques often results in less than optimal outcomes. After previously demonstrating significant return of function using muscle-nerve-muscle (MNM) grafting in a rat facial nerve model, this study compares a variant of the technique, muscle-nerve-nerve (MNN) neurotization to MNM and interposition (IP) nerve grafting. Thirty male rats were randomized into four groups (1) control with no intervention, (2) repair with IP grafts, (3) MNM grafts and (4) MNN grafts. All groups had the buccal and marginal mandibular branches of the right facial nerve resected. Return of vibrissae movement, orientation, and snout symmetry was measured over 16 weeks. Functional recovery and muscle atrophy were assessed and quantified. All interventions resulted in significant improvement in vibrissae movement and orientation as compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The MNM and MNN groups had significantly less time to forward vibrissae movement as compared to controls (p < 0.05), and a large number of animals in the MNN group had coordinated vibrissae movement at 16 weeks. MNN and IP grafts retained significantly more muscle mass as compared to control (p < 0.05). Thus, MNN grafting is a promising adjuvant or alternative technique for reanimation for patients with unilateral peripheral nerve injury who are not candidates for primary neurorrhaphy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8692869/ /pubmed/34956038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.723024 Text en Copyright © 2021 Charous, Hutz, Bialek, Schumacher and Foecking. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Charous, Steven J.
Hutz, Michael J.
Bialek, Samantha E.
Schumacher, Jane K.
Foecking, Eileen M.
Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title_full Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title_fullStr Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title_full_unstemmed Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title_short Muscle-Nerve-Nerve Grafting Improves Facial Reanimation in Rats Following Facial Nerve Injury
title_sort muscle-nerve-nerve grafting improves facial reanimation in rats following facial nerve injury
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8692869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.723024
work_keys_str_mv AT charousstevenj musclenervenervegraftingimprovesfacialreanimationinratsfollowingfacialnerveinjury
AT hutzmichaelj musclenervenervegraftingimprovesfacialreanimationinratsfollowingfacialnerveinjury
AT bialeksamanthae musclenervenervegraftingimprovesfacialreanimationinratsfollowingfacialnerveinjury
AT schumacherjanek musclenervenervegraftingimprovesfacialreanimationinratsfollowingfacialnerveinjury
AT foeckingeileenm musclenervenervegraftingimprovesfacialreanimationinratsfollowingfacialnerveinjury