Cargando…

Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments

We find that quantum mechanical calculations using B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ model chemistry involving anharmonic correction on simple conjugated organic compounds without rotating moieties provide the dipole moment values and molecular geometries with high accuracy. In the presence of one or two conjugated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lokshin, Vladimir, Sigalov, Mark, Larina, Nina, Khodorkovsky, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35423673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10182f
_version_ 1784619134536908800
author Lokshin, Vladimir
Sigalov, Mark
Larina, Nina
Khodorkovsky, Vladimir
author_facet Lokshin, Vladimir
Sigalov, Mark
Larina, Nina
Khodorkovsky, Vladimir
author_sort Lokshin, Vladimir
collection PubMed
description We find that quantum mechanical calculations using B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ model chemistry involving anharmonic correction on simple conjugated organic compounds without rotating moieties provide the dipole moment values and molecular geometries with high accuracy. In the presence of one or two conjugated electron donating or accepting substituents capable of hindered rotation, the calculated dipole moments reproduce the experimental results equally well only in the cases when the experiments were done at the temperatures at which rotation of substituents remains hindered. In order to reproduce the experimental dipole moments determined at higher temperatures, a model assuming free (unhindered) rotation should be applied. In these cases, the contribution of each rotamer is equal and using anharmonic correction is not necessary. The APFD functional produces similar results and the M062X functional yields larger deviations from the experimental data. The other methods, like HF and MP2, are the least accurate with the basis sets usually employed for interpreting the experimental data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8693400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86934002022-04-13 Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments Lokshin, Vladimir Sigalov, Mark Larina, Nina Khodorkovsky, Vladimir RSC Adv Chemistry We find that quantum mechanical calculations using B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ model chemistry involving anharmonic correction on simple conjugated organic compounds without rotating moieties provide the dipole moment values and molecular geometries with high accuracy. In the presence of one or two conjugated electron donating or accepting substituents capable of hindered rotation, the calculated dipole moments reproduce the experimental results equally well only in the cases when the experiments were done at the temperatures at which rotation of substituents remains hindered. In order to reproduce the experimental dipole moments determined at higher temperatures, a model assuming free (unhindered) rotation should be applied. In these cases, the contribution of each rotamer is equal and using anharmonic correction is not necessary. The APFD functional produces similar results and the M062X functional yields larger deviations from the experimental data. The other methods, like HF and MP2, are the least accurate with the basis sets usually employed for interpreting the experimental data. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8693400/ /pubmed/35423673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10182f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Lokshin, Vladimir
Sigalov, Mark
Larina, Nina
Khodorkovsky, Vladimir
Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title_full Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title_fullStr Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title_full_unstemmed Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title_short Dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
title_sort dipole moments of conjugated donor–acceptor substituted systems: calculations vs. experiments
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35423673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10182f
work_keys_str_mv AT lokshinvladimir dipolemomentsofconjugateddonoracceptorsubstitutedsystemscalculationsvsexperiments
AT sigalovmark dipolemomentsofconjugateddonoracceptorsubstitutedsystemscalculationsvsexperiments
AT larinanina dipolemomentsofconjugateddonoracceptorsubstitutedsystemscalculationsvsexperiments
AT khodorkovskyvladimir dipolemomentsofconjugateddonoracceptorsubstitutedsystemscalculationsvsexperiments