Cargando…

Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report

INTRODUCTION: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele (ASH), a composite of scrotal and abdominal hydroceles connected through the inguinal canal, is rare and no consensus regarding its mechanisms and surgical treatments has been reached to date. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of an 11-month-old boy w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoda, Toshifumi, Ishioka, Shigeki, Hijikata, Kohei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106668
_version_ 1784619135224774656
author Hosoda, Toshifumi
Ishioka, Shigeki
Hijikata, Kohei
author_facet Hosoda, Toshifumi
Ishioka, Shigeki
Hijikata, Kohei
author_sort Hosoda, Toshifumi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele (ASH), a composite of scrotal and abdominal hydroceles connected through the inguinal canal, is rare and no consensus regarding its mechanisms and surgical treatments has been reached to date. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of an 11-month-old boy with a large ASH. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a huge hydrocele (maximum length: 8 cm). The patient underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and the orifice of the processus vaginalis (PV) was completely closed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Follow-up ultrasonography and MRI in the first postoperative year showed no recurrence of ASH. DISCUSSION: An ASH with a length >8 cm is considered rare in pediatric patients. There is no consensus regarding its etiology and surgical intervention is selected according to the patient's condition and the characteristics of ASH. We opted to perform early surgical intervention considering the ASH size and the adverse effects on testicular development. LPEC helped identify the condition and location of the ASH and allowed safe and reliable operation of the large intrapelvic hydrocele. In patients with no PV patency, a change in approach from LPEC to an open anterior approach should be considered even if LPEC is feasible. CONCLUSION: This case provides valuable insight into successful LPEC of a large ASH without any complications, highlighting the importance of elucidating the morphological mechanisms and making an accurate diagnosis and the challenges associated with these processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8693404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86934042022-01-04 Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report Hosoda, Toshifumi Ishioka, Shigeki Hijikata, Kohei Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Abdominoscrotal hydrocele (ASH), a composite of scrotal and abdominal hydroceles connected through the inguinal canal, is rare and no consensus regarding its mechanisms and surgical treatments has been reached to date. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: We report a case of an 11-month-old boy with a large ASH. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a huge hydrocele (maximum length: 8 cm). The patient underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and the orifice of the processus vaginalis (PV) was completely closed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Follow-up ultrasonography and MRI in the first postoperative year showed no recurrence of ASH. DISCUSSION: An ASH with a length >8 cm is considered rare in pediatric patients. There is no consensus regarding its etiology and surgical intervention is selected according to the patient's condition and the characteristics of ASH. We opted to perform early surgical intervention considering the ASH size and the adverse effects on testicular development. LPEC helped identify the condition and location of the ASH and allowed safe and reliable operation of the large intrapelvic hydrocele. In patients with no PV patency, a change in approach from LPEC to an open anterior approach should be considered even if LPEC is feasible. CONCLUSION: This case provides valuable insight into successful LPEC of a large ASH without any complications, highlighting the importance of elucidating the morphological mechanisms and making an accurate diagnosis and the challenges associated with these processes. Elsevier 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8693404/ /pubmed/34923230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106668 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Hosoda, Toshifumi
Ishioka, Shigeki
Hijikata, Kohei
Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title_full Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title_fullStr Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title_short Laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A case report
title_sort laparoscopic treatment of an abdominoscrotal hydrocele: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106668
work_keys_str_mv AT hosodatoshifumi laparoscopictreatmentofanabdominoscrotalhydroceleacasereport
AT ishiokashigeki laparoscopictreatmentofanabdominoscrotalhydroceleacasereport
AT hijikatakohei laparoscopictreatmentofanabdominoscrotalhydroceleacasereport