Cargando…

Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models

The roughness of pore surfaces in shale reservoirs can affect the fluid flow, which makes it necessary to be characterized. Fractal dimension, a key component in fractal geometry, can be used to describe the surface irregularities. In this paper, we evaluated and compared the fractal dimensions of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Kouqi, Ostadhassan, Mehdi, Jang, Ho Won, Zakharova, Natalia V., Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09052b
_version_ 1784619184655695872
author Liu, Kouqi
Ostadhassan, Mehdi
Jang, Ho Won
Zakharova, Natalia V.
Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
author_facet Liu, Kouqi
Ostadhassan, Mehdi
Jang, Ho Won
Zakharova, Natalia V.
Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
author_sort Liu, Kouqi
collection PubMed
description The roughness of pore surfaces in shale reservoirs can affect the fluid flow, which makes it necessary to be characterized. Fractal dimension, a key component in fractal geometry, can be used to describe the surface irregularities. In this paper, we evaluated and compared the fractal dimensions of several shale samples with three major fractal models based on nitrogen adsorption isotherms. The results showed that Frenkel–Halsey–Hill (FHH), Neimark, and Wang–Li models all can be applied for fractal dimension characterization of shale samples. From theoretical thermodynamics, these three models should be considered identical based on the FHH equation. However, the experimental data obtained from these samples showed that the fractal dimensions that are derived from the Neimark model and Wang–Li model are the same while a discrepancy was observed with the results from the FHH model. The difference in the fractal dimensions in the experimental data among these three models was attributed to the micropore structures. It was found that as the micropore surface area or the micropore volume increases in the samples, the difference in the fractal dimensions would increase as well. If the number of micropores present in the samples is limited, all three models can become suitable for fractal dimension calculation in shale samples, otherwise, the Neimark or Wang–Li model is preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8693643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86936432022-04-13 Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models Liu, Kouqi Ostadhassan, Mehdi Jang, Ho Won Zakharova, Natalia V. Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza RSC Adv Chemistry The roughness of pore surfaces in shale reservoirs can affect the fluid flow, which makes it necessary to be characterized. Fractal dimension, a key component in fractal geometry, can be used to describe the surface irregularities. In this paper, we evaluated and compared the fractal dimensions of several shale samples with three major fractal models based on nitrogen adsorption isotherms. The results showed that Frenkel–Halsey–Hill (FHH), Neimark, and Wang–Li models all can be applied for fractal dimension characterization of shale samples. From theoretical thermodynamics, these three models should be considered identical based on the FHH equation. However, the experimental data obtained from these samples showed that the fractal dimensions that are derived from the Neimark model and Wang–Li model are the same while a discrepancy was observed with the results from the FHH model. The difference in the fractal dimensions in the experimental data among these three models was attributed to the micropore structures. It was found that as the micropore surface area or the micropore volume increases in the samples, the difference in the fractal dimensions would increase as well. If the number of micropores present in the samples is limited, all three models can become suitable for fractal dimension calculation in shale samples, otherwise, the Neimark or Wang–Li model is preferred. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8693643/ /pubmed/35424165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09052b Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Liu, Kouqi
Ostadhassan, Mehdi
Jang, Ho Won
Zakharova, Natalia V.
Shokouhimehr, Mohammadreza
Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title_full Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title_fullStr Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title_short Comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
title_sort comparison of fractal dimensions from nitrogen adsorption data in shale via different models
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35424165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09052b
work_keys_str_mv AT liukouqi comparisonoffractaldimensionsfromnitrogenadsorptiondatainshaleviadifferentmodels
AT ostadhassanmehdi comparisonoffractaldimensionsfromnitrogenadsorptiondatainshaleviadifferentmodels
AT janghowon comparisonoffractaldimensionsfromnitrogenadsorptiondatainshaleviadifferentmodels
AT zakharovanataliav comparisonoffractaldimensionsfromnitrogenadsorptiondatainshaleviadifferentmodels
AT shokouhimehrmohammadreza comparisonoffractaldimensionsfromnitrogenadsorptiondatainshaleviadifferentmodels