Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the el...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Massachusetts Medical Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463 |
_version_ | 1784619195499020288 |
---|---|
author | Dickerman, Barbra A. Gerlovin, Hanna Madenci, Arin L. Kurgansky, Katherine E. Ferolito, Brian R. Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J. Gagnon, David R. Gaziano, J. Michael Cho, Kelly Casas, Juan P. Hernán, Miguel A. |
author_facet | Dickerman, Barbra A. Gerlovin, Hanna Madenci, Arin L. Kurgansky, Katherine E. Ferolito, Brian R. Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J. Gagnon, David R. Gaziano, J. Michael Cho, Kelly Casas, Juan P. Hernán, Miguel A. |
author_sort | Dickerman, Barbra A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the electronic health records of U.S. veterans who received a first dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine between January 4 and May 14, 2021, during a period marked by predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant. We matched recipients of each vaccine in a 1:1 ratio according to their risk factors. Outcomes included documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, symptomatic Covid-19, hospitalization for Covid-19, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19, and death from Covid-19. We estimated risks using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. To assess the influence of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant, we emulated a second target trial that involved veterans vaccinated between July 1 and September 20, 2021. RESULTS: Each vaccine group included 219,842 persons. Over 24 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by alpha-variant predominance, the estimated risk of documented infection was 5.75 events per 1000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.39 to 6.23) in the BNT162b2 group and 4.52 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, 4.17 to 4.84) in the mRNA-1273 group. The excess number of events per 1000 persons for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.81) for documented infection, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.70) for symptomatic Covid-19, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83) for hospitalization for Covid-19, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.26) for ICU admission for Covid-19, and 0.02 (95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12) for death from Covid-19. The corresponding excess risk (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273) of documented infection over 12 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by delta-variant predominance was 6.54 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, −2.58 to 11.82). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-week risk of Covid-19 outcomes was low after vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, although risks were lower with mRNA-1273 than with BNT162b2. This pattern was consistent across periods marked by alpha- and delta-variant predominance. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and others.) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8693691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Massachusetts Medical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86936912021-12-27 Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans Dickerman, Barbra A. Gerlovin, Hanna Madenci, Arin L. Kurgansky, Katherine E. Ferolito, Brian R. Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J. Gagnon, David R. Gaziano, J. Michael Cho, Kelly Casas, Juan P. Hernán, Miguel A. N Engl J Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the electronic health records of U.S. veterans who received a first dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine between January 4 and May 14, 2021, during a period marked by predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant. We matched recipients of each vaccine in a 1:1 ratio according to their risk factors. Outcomes included documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, symptomatic Covid-19, hospitalization for Covid-19, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19, and death from Covid-19. We estimated risks using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. To assess the influence of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant, we emulated a second target trial that involved veterans vaccinated between July 1 and September 20, 2021. RESULTS: Each vaccine group included 219,842 persons. Over 24 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by alpha-variant predominance, the estimated risk of documented infection was 5.75 events per 1000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.39 to 6.23) in the BNT162b2 group and 4.52 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, 4.17 to 4.84) in the mRNA-1273 group. The excess number of events per 1000 persons for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.81) for documented infection, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.70) for symptomatic Covid-19, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83) for hospitalization for Covid-19, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.26) for ICU admission for Covid-19, and 0.02 (95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12) for death from Covid-19. The corresponding excess risk (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273) of documented infection over 12 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by delta-variant predominance was 6.54 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, −2.58 to 11.82). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-week risk of Covid-19 outcomes was low after vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, although risks were lower with mRNA-1273 than with BNT162b2. This pattern was consistent across periods marked by alpha- and delta-variant predominance. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and others.) Massachusetts Medical Society 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8693691/ /pubmed/34942066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463 Text en Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. http://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dickerman, Barbra A. Gerlovin, Hanna Madenci, Arin L. Kurgansky, Katherine E. Ferolito, Brian R. Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J. Gagnon, David R. Gaziano, J. Michael Cho, Kelly Casas, Juan P. Hernán, Miguel A. Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of bnt162b2 and mrna-1273 vaccines in u.s. veterans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dickermanbarbraa comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT gerlovinhanna comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT madenciarinl comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT kurganskykatherinee comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT ferolitobrianr comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT figueroamunizmichaelj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT gagnondavidr comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT gazianojmichael comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT chokelly comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT casasjuanp comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans AT hernanmiguela comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans |