Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans

BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickerman, Barbra A., Gerlovin, Hanna, Madenci, Arin L., Kurgansky, Katherine E., Ferolito, Brian R., Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J., Gagnon, David R., Gaziano, J. Michael, Cho, Kelly, Casas, Juan P., Hernán, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Massachusetts Medical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463
_version_ 1784619195499020288
author Dickerman, Barbra A.
Gerlovin, Hanna
Madenci, Arin L.
Kurgansky, Katherine E.
Ferolito, Brian R.
Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J.
Gagnon, David R.
Gaziano, J. Michael
Cho, Kelly
Casas, Juan P.
Hernán, Miguel A.
author_facet Dickerman, Barbra A.
Gerlovin, Hanna
Madenci, Arin L.
Kurgansky, Katherine E.
Ferolito, Brian R.
Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J.
Gagnon, David R.
Gaziano, J. Michael
Cho, Kelly
Casas, Juan P.
Hernán, Miguel A.
author_sort Dickerman, Barbra A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the electronic health records of U.S. veterans who received a first dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine between January 4 and May 14, 2021, during a period marked by predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant. We matched recipients of each vaccine in a 1:1 ratio according to their risk factors. Outcomes included documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, symptomatic Covid-19, hospitalization for Covid-19, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19, and death from Covid-19. We estimated risks using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. To assess the influence of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant, we emulated a second target trial that involved veterans vaccinated between July 1 and September 20, 2021. RESULTS: Each vaccine group included 219,842 persons. Over 24 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by alpha-variant predominance, the estimated risk of documented infection was 5.75 events per 1000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.39 to 6.23) in the BNT162b2 group and 4.52 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, 4.17 to 4.84) in the mRNA-1273 group. The excess number of events per 1000 persons for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.81) for documented infection, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.70) for symptomatic Covid-19, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83) for hospitalization for Covid-19, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.26) for ICU admission for Covid-19, and 0.02 (95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12) for death from Covid-19. The corresponding excess risk (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273) of documented infection over 12 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by delta-variant predominance was 6.54 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, −2.58 to 11.82). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-week risk of Covid-19 outcomes was low after vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, although risks were lower with mRNA-1273 than with BNT162b2. This pattern was consistent across periods marked by alpha- and delta-variant predominance. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and others.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8693691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Massachusetts Medical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86936912021-12-27 Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans Dickerman, Barbra A. Gerlovin, Hanna Madenci, Arin L. Kurgansky, Katherine E. Ferolito, Brian R. Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J. Gagnon, David R. Gaziano, J. Michael Cho, Kelly Casas, Juan P. Hernán, Miguel A. N Engl J Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are more than 90% effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, their comparative effectiveness for a range of outcomes across diverse populations is unknown. METHODS: We emulated a target trial using the electronic health records of U.S. veterans who received a first dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine between January 4 and May 14, 2021, during a period marked by predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) variant. We matched recipients of each vaccine in a 1:1 ratio according to their risk factors. Outcomes included documented severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, symptomatic Covid-19, hospitalization for Covid-19, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19, and death from Covid-19. We estimated risks using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. To assess the influence of the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant, we emulated a second target trial that involved veterans vaccinated between July 1 and September 20, 2021. RESULTS: Each vaccine group included 219,842 persons. Over 24 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by alpha-variant predominance, the estimated risk of documented infection was 5.75 events per 1000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.39 to 6.23) in the BNT162b2 group and 4.52 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, 4.17 to 4.84) in the mRNA-1273 group. The excess number of events per 1000 persons for BNT162b2 as compared with mRNA-1273 was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.81) for documented infection, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.70) for symptomatic Covid-19, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.83) for hospitalization for Covid-19, 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.26) for ICU admission for Covid-19, and 0.02 (95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12) for death from Covid-19. The corresponding excess risk (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273) of documented infection over 12 weeks of follow-up in a period marked by delta-variant predominance was 6.54 events per 1000 persons (95% CI, −2.58 to 11.82). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-week risk of Covid-19 outcomes was low after vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, although risks were lower with mRNA-1273 than with BNT162b2. This pattern was consistent across periods marked by alpha- and delta-variant predominance. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs and others.) Massachusetts Medical Society 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8693691/ /pubmed/34942066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463 Text en Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. http://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dickerman, Barbra A.
Gerlovin, Hanna
Madenci, Arin L.
Kurgansky, Katherine E.
Ferolito, Brian R.
Figueroa Muñiz, Michael J.
Gagnon, David R.
Gaziano, J. Michael
Cho, Kelly
Casas, Juan P.
Hernán, Miguel A.
Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans
title_sort comparative effectiveness of bnt162b2 and mrna-1273 vaccines in u.s. veterans
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8693691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2115463
work_keys_str_mv AT dickermanbarbraa comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT gerlovinhanna comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT madenciarinl comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT kurganskykatherinee comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT ferolitobrianr comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT figueroamunizmichaelj comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT gagnondavidr comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT gazianojmichael comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT chokelly comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT casasjuanp comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans
AT hernanmiguela comparativeeffectivenessofbnt162b2andmrna1273vaccinesinusveterans