Cargando…

Robotic live donor hysterectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla, Kvarnström, Niclas, Brännström, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000926
_version_ 1784619312068165632
author Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
Kvarnström, Niclas
Brännström, Mats
author_facet Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
Kvarnström, Niclas
Brännström, Mats
author_sort Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in narrow space. This review covers the development and benefits of robotics and the published robotic donor hysterectomy experiences. RECENT FINDINGS: Robotic donor hysterectomy publications are scarce with eight cases in Sweden, five in USA, and one each in China and Spain. Robotics have been performed for either the entire donor hysterectomy or with conversion to laparotomy for the last steps of the surgical procedure. The total operative times are in line with open surgery, although a decrease is expected in the future. The estimated blood loss and hospital stays are less than at open surgery. The complication panorama includes hydronephrosis, ureteric fistula and pressure alopecia. Live births with healthy babies have been reported. SUMMARY: In uterus transplantation, robotic live donor hysterectomy has proven to be feasible, safe and associated with successful live births. The robotic donor hysterectomy is a low-volume procedure and an international registry to gather collective information is crucial for further evaluation and development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8694250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86942502021-12-23 Robotic live donor hysterectomy Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla Kvarnström, Niclas Brännström, Mats Curr Opin Organ Transplant VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Stefan G. Tullius PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Donor hysterectomy for live donor uterus transplantation was from the start performed by laparotomy, but minimal invasive surgery has entered the scene. In particular robotic-assisted laparoscopy is used since robotics is advantageous in the complex donor hysterectomy surgery in narrow space. This review covers the development and benefits of robotics and the published robotic donor hysterectomy experiences. RECENT FINDINGS: Robotic donor hysterectomy publications are scarce with eight cases in Sweden, five in USA, and one each in China and Spain. Robotics have been performed for either the entire donor hysterectomy or with conversion to laparotomy for the last steps of the surgical procedure. The total operative times are in line with open surgery, although a decrease is expected in the future. The estimated blood loss and hospital stays are less than at open surgery. The complication panorama includes hydronephrosis, ureteric fistula and pressure alopecia. Live births with healthy babies have been reported. SUMMARY: In uterus transplantation, robotic live donor hysterectomy has proven to be feasible, safe and associated with successful live births. The robotic donor hysterectomy is a low-volume procedure and an international registry to gather collective information is crucial for further evaluation and development. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8694250/ /pubmed/34593704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000926 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Stefan G. Tullius
Dahm-Kähler, Pernilla
Kvarnström, Niclas
Brännström, Mats
Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title_full Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title_fullStr Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title_short Robotic live donor hysterectomy
title_sort robotic live donor hysterectomy
topic VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Stefan G. Tullius
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34593704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000926
work_keys_str_mv AT dahmkahlerpernilla roboticlivedonorhysterectomy
AT kvarnstromniclas roboticlivedonorhysterectomy
AT brannstrommats roboticlivedonorhysterectomy