Cargando…
How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election?
The 2020 U.S. election saw a record turnout, saw a huge increase in absentee voting, and brought unified national Democratic control—yet these facts alone do not imply that vote-by-mail increased turnout or benefited Democrats. Using new microdata on millions of individual voters and aggregated turn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk1755 |
_version_ | 1784619393480654848 |
---|---|
author | Yoder, Jesse Handan-Nader, Cassandra Myers, Andrew Nowacki, Tobias Thompson, Daniel M. Wu, Jennifer A. Yorgason, Chenoa Hall, Andrew B. |
author_facet | Yoder, Jesse Handan-Nader, Cassandra Myers, Andrew Nowacki, Tobias Thompson, Daniel M. Wu, Jennifer A. Yorgason, Chenoa Hall, Andrew B. |
author_sort | Yoder, Jesse |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 2020 U.S. election saw a record turnout, saw a huge increase in absentee voting, and brought unified national Democratic control—yet these facts alone do not imply that vote-by-mail increased turnout or benefited Democrats. Using new microdata on millions of individual voters and aggregated turnout data across all 50 states, this paper offers a causal analysis of the impact of absentee vote-by-mail during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. Focusing on natural experiments in Texas and Indiana, we find that 65-year-olds voted at nearly the same rate as 64-year-olds, despite the fact that only 65-year-olds could vote absentee without an excuse. Being just old enough to vote no-excuse absentee did not substantially increase Democratic turnout relative to Republican turnout. Voter interest appeared to be more important in driving turnout across vote modes, neutralizing the electoral impact of Democrats voting by mail at higher rates during the historic pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8694609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86946092022-01-03 How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? Yoder, Jesse Handan-Nader, Cassandra Myers, Andrew Nowacki, Tobias Thompson, Daniel M. Wu, Jennifer A. Yorgason, Chenoa Hall, Andrew B. Sci Adv Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences The 2020 U.S. election saw a record turnout, saw a huge increase in absentee voting, and brought unified national Democratic control—yet these facts alone do not imply that vote-by-mail increased turnout or benefited Democrats. Using new microdata on millions of individual voters and aggregated turnout data across all 50 states, this paper offers a causal analysis of the impact of absentee vote-by-mail during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. Focusing on natural experiments in Texas and Indiana, we find that 65-year-olds voted at nearly the same rate as 64-year-olds, despite the fact that only 65-year-olds could vote absentee without an excuse. Being just old enough to vote no-excuse absentee did not substantially increase Democratic turnout relative to Republican turnout. Voter interest appeared to be more important in driving turnout across vote modes, neutralizing the electoral impact of Democrats voting by mail at higher rates during the historic pandemic. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8694609/ /pubmed/34936453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk1755 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences Yoder, Jesse Handan-Nader, Cassandra Myers, Andrew Nowacki, Tobias Thompson, Daniel M. Wu, Jennifer A. Yorgason, Chenoa Hall, Andrew B. How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title | How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title_full | How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title_fullStr | How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title_full_unstemmed | How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title_short | How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election? |
title_sort | how did absentee voting affect the 2020 u.s. election? |
topic | Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8694609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk1755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoderjesse howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT handannadercassandra howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT myersandrew howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT nowackitobias howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT thompsondanielm howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT wujennifera howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT yorgasonchenoa howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection AT hallandrewb howdidabsenteevotingaffectthe2020uselection |