Cargando…

European consensus on patient contact shielding

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiles, Peter, Gilligan, Patrick, Damilakis, John, Briers, Eric, Candela-Juan, Cristian, Faj, Dario, Foley, Shane, Frija, Guy, Granata, Claudio, de las Heras Gala, Hugo, Pauwels, Ruben, Sans Merce, Marta, Simantirakis, Georgios, Vano, Eliseo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34939154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4
_version_ 1784619569270226944
author Hiles, Peter
Gilligan, Patrick
Damilakis, John
Briers, Eric
Candela-Juan, Cristian
Faj, Dario
Foley, Shane
Frija, Guy
Granata, Claudio
de las Heras Gala, Hugo
Pauwels, Ruben
Sans Merce, Marta
Simantirakis, Georgios
Vano, Eliseo
author_facet Hiles, Peter
Gilligan, Patrick
Damilakis, John
Briers, Eric
Candela-Juan, Cristian
Faj, Dario
Foley, Shane
Frija, Guy
Granata, Claudio
de las Heras Gala, Hugo
Pauwels, Ruben
Sans Merce, Marta
Simantirakis, Georgios
Vano, Eliseo
author_sort Hiles, Peter
collection PubMed
description Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8695402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86954022022-01-10 European consensus on patient contact shielding Hiles, Peter Gilligan, Patrick Damilakis, John Briers, Eric Candela-Juan, Cristian Faj, Dario Foley, Shane Frija, Guy Granata, Claudio de las Heras Gala, Hugo Pauwels, Ruben Sans Merce, Marta Simantirakis, Georgios Vano, Eliseo Insights Imaging Statement Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8695402/ /pubmed/34939154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Statement
Hiles, Peter
Gilligan, Patrick
Damilakis, John
Briers, Eric
Candela-Juan, Cristian
Faj, Dario
Foley, Shane
Frija, Guy
Granata, Claudio
de las Heras Gala, Hugo
Pauwels, Ruben
Sans Merce, Marta
Simantirakis, Georgios
Vano, Eliseo
European consensus on patient contact shielding
title European consensus on patient contact shielding
title_full European consensus on patient contact shielding
title_fullStr European consensus on patient contact shielding
title_full_unstemmed European consensus on patient contact shielding
title_short European consensus on patient contact shielding
title_sort european consensus on patient contact shielding
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34939154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hilespeter europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT gilliganpatrick europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT damilakisjohn europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT brierseric europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT candelajuancristian europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT fajdario europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT foleyshane europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT frijaguy europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT granataclaudio europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT delasherasgalahugo europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT pauwelsruben europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT sansmercemarta europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT simantirakisgeorgios europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding
AT vanoeliseo europeanconsensusonpatientcontactshielding