Cargando…
The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite their popularity, the efficacy of interventions targeting gut microbiota to improve depressive symptoms is unknown. Our objective is to summarize the effect of microbiome-targeting interventions on depressive symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Joule Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933877 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200283 |
_version_ | 1784619601710022656 |
---|---|
author | Hofmeister, Mark Clement, Fiona Patten, Scott Li, Joyce Dowsett, Laura E. Farkas, Brenlea Mastikhina, Liza Egunsola, Oluwaseun Diaz, Ruth Cooke, Noah C.A. Taylor, Valerie H. |
author_facet | Hofmeister, Mark Clement, Fiona Patten, Scott Li, Joyce Dowsett, Laura E. Farkas, Brenlea Mastikhina, Liza Egunsola, Oluwaseun Diaz, Ruth Cooke, Noah C.A. Taylor, Valerie H. |
author_sort | Hofmeister, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite their popularity, the efficacy of interventions targeting gut microbiota to improve depressive symptoms is unknown. Our objective is to summarize the effect of microbiome-targeting interventions on depressive symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from inception to Mar. 5, 2021. We included studies that evaluated probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, paraprobiotic or fecal microbiota transplant interventions in an adult population (age ≥ 18 yr) with an inactive or placebo comparator (defined by the absence of active intervention). Studies must have measured depressive symptoms with a validated scale, and used a randomized controlled trial study design. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis of change scores, using standardized mean difference as the measure of effect. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies formed the final data set, with 50 included in the meta-analysis. Probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions on depressive symptoms showed statistically significant benefits. In the single studies evaluating each of fecal microbiota transplant and paraprobiotic interventions, neither showed a statistically significant benefit. INTERPRETATION: Despite promising findings of benefit of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic interventions for depressive symptoms in study populations, there is not yet strong enough evidence to favour inclusion of these interventions in treatment guidelines for depression. Critical questions about species administered, dosage and timing relative to other antidepressant medications remain to be answered. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. 143178 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8695538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | CMA Joule Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86955382021-12-24 The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hofmeister, Mark Clement, Fiona Patten, Scott Li, Joyce Dowsett, Laura E. Farkas, Brenlea Mastikhina, Liza Egunsola, Oluwaseun Diaz, Ruth Cooke, Noah C.A. Taylor, Valerie H. CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Despite their popularity, the efficacy of interventions targeting gut microbiota to improve depressive symptoms is unknown. Our objective is to summarize the effect of microbiome-targeting interventions on depressive symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from inception to Mar. 5, 2021. We included studies that evaluated probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, paraprobiotic or fecal microbiota transplant interventions in an adult population (age ≥ 18 yr) with an inactive or placebo comparator (defined by the absence of active intervention). Studies must have measured depressive symptoms with a validated scale, and used a randomized controlled trial study design. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis of change scores, using standardized mean difference as the measure of effect. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies formed the final data set, with 50 included in the meta-analysis. Probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic interventions on depressive symptoms showed statistically significant benefits. In the single studies evaluating each of fecal microbiota transplant and paraprobiotic interventions, neither showed a statistically significant benefit. INTERPRETATION: Despite promising findings of benefit of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic interventions for depressive symptoms in study populations, there is not yet strong enough evidence to favour inclusion of these interventions in treatment guidelines for depression. Critical questions about species administered, dosage and timing relative to other antidepressant medications remain to be answered. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. 143178 CMA Joule Inc. 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8695538/ /pubmed/34933877 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200283 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Hofmeister, Mark Clement, Fiona Patten, Scott Li, Joyce Dowsett, Laura E. Farkas, Brenlea Mastikhina, Liza Egunsola, Oluwaseun Diaz, Ruth Cooke, Noah C.A. Taylor, Valerie H. The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of interventions targeting gut microbiota on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933877 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmeistermark theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT clementfiona theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pattenscott theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijoyce theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dowsettlaurae theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT farkasbrenlea theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mastikhinaliza theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT egunsolaoluwaseun theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diazruth theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cookenoahca theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taylorvalerieh theeffectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hofmeistermark effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT clementfiona effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pattenscott effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijoyce effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dowsettlaurae effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT farkasbrenlea effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mastikhinaliza effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT egunsolaoluwaseun effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT diazruth effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cookenoahca effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taylorvalerieh effectofinterventionstargetinggutmicrobiotaondepressivesymptomsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |