Cargando…

Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess if injury-related alterations in the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5) are matched by changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation-derived intracortical inhibition. We hypothesised that neurophysiological measures would take longer to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ntikas, Michail, Hunter, Angus M., Gallagher, Iain J., Di Virgilio, Thomas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34957396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.737712
_version_ 1784619679908626432
author Ntikas, Michail
Hunter, Angus M.
Gallagher, Iain J.
Di Virgilio, Thomas G.
author_facet Ntikas, Michail
Hunter, Angus M.
Gallagher, Iain J.
Di Virgilio, Thomas G.
author_sort Ntikas, Michail
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess if injury-related alterations in the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5) are matched by changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation-derived intracortical inhibition. We hypothesised that neurophysiological measures would take longer to return to normal than recovery assessed by the SCAT5 following sport related concussion (SRC). Methods: Thirteen male contact sport athletes (20.5 ± 4.5 years), who reported a concussion were recruited from local Rugby and American football clubs. Participants were tested at 4 timepoints throughout the concussion recovery period: within 24 h of concussion (day 0), and at 7, 9, and 11 days after concussion. All participants completed the SCAT5 and underwent TMS to assess cortical silent period duration (CSp), a measure of intracortical inhibition. Results: After concussion CSp significantly declined from day 0 (122 ± 28 ms) to day 11 (106 ± 15 ms) [F((3, 33)) = 7.80, p < 0.001]. SCAT5 measures of symptom number and severity were significantly decreased [symptom number: [Formula: see text] = 30.44, p < 0.01; symptom severity: [Formula: see text] = 25.75, p < 0.001] between the day 0 timepoint and each of the other timepoints. SCAT5 balance errors (mBESS) decreased significantly [F((3, 33)) = 19.55, p < 0.001] between the day 0 timepoint and each of the other timepoints. CSp and SCAT5 recovery patterns were different. SCAT5 domains recovered faster showing no further significant changes after day 7, whilst CSp was still decreasing between days 7 and 9. Due to the small sample size we also used a Bayesian linear model to investigate the recovery of CSp and mBESS. The posterior distribution of our Bayesian model provided evidence that CSp decreased at day 7 and it continued to decrease at day 9, unlike mBESS which decreased at day 7 and then reached a plateau. Conclusion: There are clinically important discrepancies between clinical and neurophysiological measures of concussion recovery. This finding has important implications for return to play (RTP) protocols and the prevention of complications after sport concussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8695881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86958812021-12-24 Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion Ntikas, Michail Hunter, Angus M. Gallagher, Iain J. Di Virgilio, Thomas G. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess if injury-related alterations in the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5) are matched by changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation-derived intracortical inhibition. We hypothesised that neurophysiological measures would take longer to return to normal than recovery assessed by the SCAT5 following sport related concussion (SRC). Methods: Thirteen male contact sport athletes (20.5 ± 4.5 years), who reported a concussion were recruited from local Rugby and American football clubs. Participants were tested at 4 timepoints throughout the concussion recovery period: within 24 h of concussion (day 0), and at 7, 9, and 11 days after concussion. All participants completed the SCAT5 and underwent TMS to assess cortical silent period duration (CSp), a measure of intracortical inhibition. Results: After concussion CSp significantly declined from day 0 (122 ± 28 ms) to day 11 (106 ± 15 ms) [F((3, 33)) = 7.80, p < 0.001]. SCAT5 measures of symptom number and severity were significantly decreased [symptom number: [Formula: see text] = 30.44, p < 0.01; symptom severity: [Formula: see text] = 25.75, p < 0.001] between the day 0 timepoint and each of the other timepoints. SCAT5 balance errors (mBESS) decreased significantly [F((3, 33)) = 19.55, p < 0.001] between the day 0 timepoint and each of the other timepoints. CSp and SCAT5 recovery patterns were different. SCAT5 domains recovered faster showing no further significant changes after day 7, whilst CSp was still decreasing between days 7 and 9. Due to the small sample size we also used a Bayesian linear model to investigate the recovery of CSp and mBESS. The posterior distribution of our Bayesian model provided evidence that CSp decreased at day 7 and it continued to decrease at day 9, unlike mBESS which decreased at day 7 and then reached a plateau. Conclusion: There are clinically important discrepancies between clinical and neurophysiological measures of concussion recovery. This finding has important implications for return to play (RTP) protocols and the prevention of complications after sport concussion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8695881/ /pubmed/34957396 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.737712 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ntikas, Hunter, Gallagher and Di Virgilio. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Ntikas, Michail
Hunter, Angus M.
Gallagher, Iain J.
Di Virgilio, Thomas G.
Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title_full Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title_fullStr Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title_full_unstemmed Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title_short Longer Neurophysiological vs. Clinical Recovery Following Sport Concussion
title_sort longer neurophysiological vs. clinical recovery following sport concussion
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8695881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34957396
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.737712
work_keys_str_mv AT ntikasmichail longerneurophysiologicalvsclinicalrecoveryfollowingsportconcussion
AT hunterangusm longerneurophysiologicalvsclinicalrecoveryfollowingsportconcussion
AT gallagheriainj longerneurophysiologicalvsclinicalrecoveryfollowingsportconcussion
AT divirgiliothomasg longerneurophysiologicalvsclinicalrecoveryfollowingsportconcussion