Cargando…

Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries

CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc ligament is a strong interosseous ligament located between the medial cuneiform (C1) and base of the second metatarsal (M2). Lisfranc injuries occur in approximately 0.2% of all fractures and are often overlooked or misdiagnosed. Weig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugino, Yuki, Yoshimura, Ichiro, Hagio, Tomonobu, Nagatomo, Masaya, Yamamoto, Takuaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696375/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00462
_version_ 1784619796423245824
author Sugino, Yuki
Yoshimura, Ichiro
Hagio, Tomonobu
Nagatomo, Masaya
Yamamoto, Takuaki
author_facet Sugino, Yuki
Yoshimura, Ichiro
Hagio, Tomonobu
Nagatomo, Masaya
Yamamoto, Takuaki
author_sort Sugino, Yuki
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc ligament is a strong interosseous ligament located between the medial cuneiform (C1) and base of the second metatarsal (M2). Lisfranc injuries occur in approximately 0.2% of all fractures and are often overlooked or misdiagnosed. Weightbearing radiograph of the foot has been used as a diagnostic method for Lisfranc injuries; however, there is no study to evaluate the reliability of the measurement techniques on weightbearing radiographs. While several measurement techniques on weightbearing radiograph have been proposed for evaluating Lisfranc injuries, it remains unclear which measurement is the most reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measurement techniques using weightbearing radiographs. METHODS: Seventeen patients who were diagnosed with Lisfranc injuries using weightbearing radiographs and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation in our hospital between January 2013 and April 2019 were included in this study. Patients with multiple fractures were excluded. Four observers were selected, of which two were orthopedic specialists with more than six years of experience, while the remaining two were orthopedic surgeons with less than five years of experience. Observers evaluated the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the five measurement points on weightbearing radiographs on the affected and unaffected sides. The measurement points included the proximal, middle, and distal C1-M2 distance and parallel distance of C1-M2 and C1- the medial cuneiform (C2). RESULTS: The proximal, middle, and distal C1-M2 distance and parallel distance of C1-M2 of The affected sides were wider than those of the unaffected sides with significant difference (p<0.01). The middle C1-M2 distance of the affected sides showed the highest intra-observer reliability (0.92) and the second highest inter-observer reliability (0.8). Other measurements of the affected sides showed comparable intra- (0.76-0.91) and inter-observer reliability (0.62-0.84). In addition, the middle C1-M2 distance of the unaffected sides showed the highest intra- (0.76) and inter-observer reliability (0.64); however, all measurements of the unaffected sides showed lower reliability than all measurements of the affected sides. CONCLUSION: The most reliable measurement point on the weightbearing radiograph was the middle distance of C1-M2. This result may help avoid overlooking or misdiagnosis of Lisfranc injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86963752022-01-28 Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries Sugino, Yuki Yoshimura, Ichiro Hagio, Tomonobu Nagatomo, Masaya Yamamoto, Takuaki Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc ligament is a strong interosseous ligament located between the medial cuneiform (C1) and base of the second metatarsal (M2). Lisfranc injuries occur in approximately 0.2% of all fractures and are often overlooked or misdiagnosed. Weightbearing radiograph of the foot has been used as a diagnostic method for Lisfranc injuries; however, there is no study to evaluate the reliability of the measurement techniques on weightbearing radiographs. While several measurement techniques on weightbearing radiograph have been proposed for evaluating Lisfranc injuries, it remains unclear which measurement is the most reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the measurement techniques using weightbearing radiographs. METHODS: Seventeen patients who were diagnosed with Lisfranc injuries using weightbearing radiographs and were treated with open reduction and internal fixation in our hospital between January 2013 and April 2019 were included in this study. Patients with multiple fractures were excluded. Four observers were selected, of which two were orthopedic specialists with more than six years of experience, while the remaining two were orthopedic surgeons with less than five years of experience. Observers evaluated the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the five measurement points on weightbearing radiographs on the affected and unaffected sides. The measurement points included the proximal, middle, and distal C1-M2 distance and parallel distance of C1-M2 and C1- the medial cuneiform (C2). RESULTS: The proximal, middle, and distal C1-M2 distance and parallel distance of C1-M2 of The affected sides were wider than those of the unaffected sides with significant difference (p<0.01). The middle C1-M2 distance of the affected sides showed the highest intra-observer reliability (0.92) and the second highest inter-observer reliability (0.8). Other measurements of the affected sides showed comparable intra- (0.76-0.91) and inter-observer reliability (0.62-0.84). In addition, the middle C1-M2 distance of the unaffected sides showed the highest intra- (0.76) and inter-observer reliability (0.64); however, all measurements of the unaffected sides showed lower reliability than all measurements of the affected sides. CONCLUSION: The most reliable measurement point on the weightbearing radiograph was the middle distance of C1-M2. This result may help avoid overlooking or misdiagnosis of Lisfranc injuries. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8696375/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00462 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Sugino, Yuki
Yoshimura, Ichiro
Hagio, Tomonobu
Nagatomo, Masaya
Yamamoto, Takuaki
Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title_full Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title_fullStr Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title_short Reliability of Evaluating Methods using Weightbearing Radiograph of the Foot in Lisfranc Injuries
title_sort reliability of evaluating methods using weightbearing radiograph of the foot in lisfranc injuries
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696375/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00462
work_keys_str_mv AT suginoyuki reliabilityofevaluatingmethodsusingweightbearingradiographofthefootinlisfrancinjuries
AT yoshimuraichiro reliabilityofevaluatingmethodsusingweightbearingradiographofthefootinlisfrancinjuries
AT hagiotomonobu reliabilityofevaluatingmethodsusingweightbearingradiographofthefootinlisfrancinjuries
AT nagatomomasaya reliabilityofevaluatingmethodsusingweightbearingradiographofthefootinlisfrancinjuries
AT yamamototakuaki reliabilityofevaluatingmethodsusingweightbearingradiographofthefootinlisfrancinjuries