Cargando…

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)

CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation process is essential to optimize the management of patients with foot and ankle pathologies and disorders. The study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the four scoring systems of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhadhoud, Meshal A., Alsiri, Najla F., Alsaffar, Maryam M., Glazebrook, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696421/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00102
_version_ 1784619808175685632
author Alhadhoud, Meshal A.
Alsiri, Najla F.
Alsaffar, Maryam M.
Glazebrook, Mark A.
author_facet Alhadhoud, Meshal A.
Alsiri, Najla F.
Alsaffar, Maryam M.
Glazebrook, Mark A.
author_sort Alhadhoud, Meshal A.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation process is essential to optimize the management of patients with foot and ankle pathologies and disorders. The study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the four scoring systems of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) into Arabic and explore related psychometric properties. METHODS: A multicenter observational design was used, following the forward-backward translation method. One hundred and twenty patients with foot and ankle problems were included. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed using Intra-class correlation coefficients; internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach’s alpha, and the responsiveness was analyzed using a paired-sample test. RESULTS: The validity ranged from 0.303-0.542 and from 0.018-0.753 when correlated to the SF-12 physical and mental component scores, respectively. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.727-0.974; from 0.826-0.983 for internal consistency and from 0.001-0.182 for sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The AOFAS’s four systems were successfully translated and culturally adapted into Arabic with sufficient psychometric properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86964212022-01-28 Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) Alhadhoud, Meshal A. Alsiri, Najla F. Alsaffar, Maryam M. Glazebrook, Mark A. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation process is essential to optimize the management of patients with foot and ankle pathologies and disorders. The study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the four scoring systems of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) into Arabic and explore related psychometric properties. METHODS: A multicenter observational design was used, following the forward-backward translation method. One hundred and twenty patients with foot and ankle problems were included. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed using Intra-class correlation coefficients; internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach’s alpha, and the responsiveness was analyzed using a paired-sample test. RESULTS: The validity ranged from 0.303-0.542 and from 0.018-0.753 when correlated to the SF-12 physical and mental component scores, respectively. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.727-0.974; from 0.826-0.983 for internal consistency and from 0.001-0.182 for sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The AOFAS’s four systems were successfully translated and culturally adapted into Arabic with sufficient psychometric properties. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8696421/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00102 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Alhadhoud, Meshal A.
Alsiri, Najla F.
Alsaffar, Maryam M.
Glazebrook, Mark A.
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title_full Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title_fullStr Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title_short Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an arabic version of the american orthopaedic foot & ankle society score (aofas)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696421/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00102
work_keys_str_mv AT alhadhoudmeshala crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofanarabicversionoftheamericanorthopaedicfootanklesocietyscoreaofas
AT alsirinajlaf crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofanarabicversionoftheamericanorthopaedicfootanklesocietyscoreaofas
AT alsaffarmaryamm crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofanarabicversionoftheamericanorthopaedicfootanklesocietyscoreaofas
AT glazebrookmarka crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofanarabicversionoftheamericanorthopaedicfootanklesocietyscoreaofas