Cargando…

Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening

CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lateral Column lengthening through an osteotomy of the anterior process of the calcaneus is one of the most effective procedures for restoring arch alignment in the adult acquired flatfoot, without fusing essential joints. Despite remarkable radiographic correct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freibott, Christina E., Shoap, Seth C., Evangelista, Maria C., Vosseller, J. Turner, Greisberg, Justin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696428/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00177
_version_ 1784619809834532864
author Freibott, Christina E.
Shoap, Seth C.
Evangelista, Maria C.
Vosseller, J. Turner
Greisberg, Justin K.
author_facet Freibott, Christina E.
Shoap, Seth C.
Evangelista, Maria C.
Vosseller, J. Turner
Greisberg, Justin K.
author_sort Freibott, Christina E.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lateral Column lengthening through an osteotomy of the anterior process of the calcaneus is one of the most effective procedures for restoring arch alignment in the adult acquired flatfoot, without fusing essential joints. Despite remarkable radiographic corrections, previous studies have found persistent lateral hindfoot pain remains a challenge. In this study, we reviewed a large series of patients who underwent lateral column lengthening as part of flat foot reconstructive surgery, using either autograft or allograft. Rates of graft collapse and loss of fixation were determined with two different graft sources. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, all patients who underwent lateral column lengthening between 2002 and 2018 were reviewed for clinical and radiographic outcomes. Variables such as age, gender, diagnosis, type of bone graft, subsequent surgery, screw/hardware breakage, length of follow-up, time until weight bearing, and length of radiographic follow-up were recorded. Approximately half the patients had iliac crest allograft for the distraction, and the others had proximal tibial structural autograft. RESULTS: 52 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 47±14 years (range 18-86), with 32 women (62%) and 20 men (38%). 25 (48%) patients had a second surgery, most often for hardware removal. Two patients had repair of a nonunion. Twenty- five percent of patients who had proximal tibial autograft had hardware breakage and some degree of graft collapse, whereas none had hardware breakage in the iliac crest allograft group (p<0.05). Twenty-one of the 36 patients in the proximal tibia autograft group underwent a second surgery for persistent lateral column pain, with removal of hardware and bone debridement, compared to only 4 in the allograft group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Proximal tibia autograft performed relatively poorly in this case series, with a higher rate of graft collapse and lateral column pain. The allograft group had less complications, but even in this group, the rate of revision surgery is higher than might be expected for foot surgery in general. Lateral column lengthening is a powerful procedure for restoring hindfoot alignment without sacrificing essential joints, but suffers from a relatively high rate of persistent lateral column pain (which usually is not present prior to surgery) and reoperation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86964282022-01-28 Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening Freibott, Christina E. Shoap, Seth C. Evangelista, Maria C. Vosseller, J. Turner Greisberg, Justin K. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lateral Column lengthening through an osteotomy of the anterior process of the calcaneus is one of the most effective procedures for restoring arch alignment in the adult acquired flatfoot, without fusing essential joints. Despite remarkable radiographic corrections, previous studies have found persistent lateral hindfoot pain remains a challenge. In this study, we reviewed a large series of patients who underwent lateral column lengthening as part of flat foot reconstructive surgery, using either autograft or allograft. Rates of graft collapse and loss of fixation were determined with two different graft sources. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, all patients who underwent lateral column lengthening between 2002 and 2018 were reviewed for clinical and radiographic outcomes. Variables such as age, gender, diagnosis, type of bone graft, subsequent surgery, screw/hardware breakage, length of follow-up, time until weight bearing, and length of radiographic follow-up were recorded. Approximately half the patients had iliac crest allograft for the distraction, and the others had proximal tibial structural autograft. RESULTS: 52 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 47±14 years (range 18-86), with 32 women (62%) and 20 men (38%). 25 (48%) patients had a second surgery, most often for hardware removal. Two patients had repair of a nonunion. Twenty- five percent of patients who had proximal tibial autograft had hardware breakage and some degree of graft collapse, whereas none had hardware breakage in the iliac crest allograft group (p<0.05). Twenty-one of the 36 patients in the proximal tibia autograft group underwent a second surgery for persistent lateral column pain, with removal of hardware and bone debridement, compared to only 4 in the allograft group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Proximal tibia autograft performed relatively poorly in this case series, with a higher rate of graft collapse and lateral column pain. The allograft group had less complications, but even in this group, the rate of revision surgery is higher than might be expected for foot surgery in general. Lateral column lengthening is a powerful procedure for restoring hindfoot alignment without sacrificing essential joints, but suffers from a relatively high rate of persistent lateral column pain (which usually is not present prior to surgery) and reoperation. SAGE Publications 2019-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8696428/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00177 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Freibott, Christina E.
Shoap, Seth C.
Evangelista, Maria C.
Vosseller, J. Turner
Greisberg, Justin K.
Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title_full Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title_fullStr Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title_full_unstemmed Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title_short Graft Collapse and Loss of Fixation in Lateral Column Lengthening
title_sort graft collapse and loss of fixation in lateral column lengthening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696428/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00177
work_keys_str_mv AT freibottchristinae graftcollapseandlossoffixationinlateralcolumnlengthening
AT shoapsethc graftcollapseandlossoffixationinlateralcolumnlengthening
AT evangelistamariac graftcollapseandlossoffixationinlateralcolumnlengthening
AT vossellerjturner graftcollapseandlossoffixationinlateralcolumnlengthening
AT greisbergjustink graftcollapseandlossoffixationinlateralcolumnlengthening