Cargando…

The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties

CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Refaie, Ramsay, Shahid, Zuhaib, Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas, Siddique, Malik S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696441/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00399
_version_ 1784619813463654400
author Refaie, Ramsay
Shahid, Zuhaib
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Siddique, Malik S.
author_facet Refaie, Ramsay
Shahid, Zuhaib
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Siddique, Malik S.
author_sort Refaie, Ramsay
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. RESULTS: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. CONCLUSION: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86964412022-01-28 The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties Refaie, Ramsay Shahid, Zuhaib Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas Siddique, Malik S. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty remains challenging. Clinical and radiographic examination are the mainstay of surveillance. The use of CT is also widespread. In our series using CT we were however unable to reliably differentiate between prosthetic and other causes of pain. We do not therefore recommend the use of CT in evaluating this patient group. Since 2017 we have evaluated all cases of painful ankle replacement with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). The aim of this study was to review the use of SPECT in our patient cohort. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all ankle arthroplasties evaluated by SPECT was performed. Case notes, plain radiographic imaging and SPECT imaging were reviewed and tabulated for analysis. RESULTS: 29 painful ankle arthroplasties were identified and included in this study. Implants included 14 BOX, 11 Mobility, 3 Salto xt and 1 Zenith. The mean time from index surgery was 5 years (1 -11 years). Plain radiographs demonstrated no obvious abnormality in 18 out of 29 patients. Of these SPECT demonstrated abnormal periprosthetic uptake suggestive of loosening in 12 out of 18, in the remaining 6 no loosening / ankle pathology was identified. Of these 6 patients SPECT identified an area of extra- articular high uptake suggestive of a pain source in 3 cases (1 talonavicular joint, 1 subtalar joint and 1 syndesmosis). In the 11 patients with a demonstrable abnormality suggestive of loosening on plain imaging, SPECT confirmed the diagnosis in all 11 cases. CONCLUSION: SPECT is a useful tool in the evaluation of the painful ankle arthroplasty. SPECT provided confirmatory information where plain radiographs were positive but also helped elucidate potential causes of pain where plain radiographs were negative. We would no longer recommend the routine use of CT but rather would recommend the use of SPECT in the evaluation of all painful ankle arthroplasties. SAGE Publications 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8696441/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00399 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Refaie, Ramsay
Shahid, Zuhaib
Ramaskandhan, Jayasree Ramas
Siddique, Malik S.
The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title_full The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title_fullStr The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title_short The Use of Single-Photon-Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Evaluation of Painful Ankle Arthroplasties
title_sort use of single-photon-emission computed tomography (spect) for the evaluation of painful ankle arthroplasties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696441/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00399
work_keys_str_mv AT refaieramsay theuseofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT shahidzuhaib theuseofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT ramaskandhanjayasreeramas theuseofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT siddiquemaliks theuseofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT refaieramsay useofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT shahidzuhaib useofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT ramaskandhanjayasreeramas useofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties
AT siddiquemaliks useofsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyspectfortheevaluationofpainfulanklearthroplasties