Cargando…

Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair

CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Different techniques have been described for Achilles Tendon Rupture repair, but no biomechanical evaluation have been performed separately for proximal and distal suturing techniques.The purpose of this study was to biomechanically analyze 3 proximal and 2 dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Pablo, Wagner, Emilio, Lopez, Mario, Etchevers, Gaston, Valencia, Oscar, Guzman-Venegas, Rodrigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00432
_version_ 1784619828910227456
author Wagner, Pablo
Wagner, Emilio
Lopez, Mario
Etchevers, Gaston
Valencia, Oscar
Guzman-Venegas, Rodrigo
author_facet Wagner, Pablo
Wagner, Emilio
Lopez, Mario
Etchevers, Gaston
Valencia, Oscar
Guzman-Venegas, Rodrigo
author_sort Wagner, Pablo
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Different techniques have been described for Achilles Tendon Rupture repair, but no biomechanical evaluation have been performed separately for proximal and distal suturing techniques.The purpose of this study was to biomechanically analyze 3 proximal and 2 distal suture configurations during a simulated cyclic load and load to failure. It was hypothesized that proximal suturing technique was stronger than the distal one and that the modified double suturing technique was the strongest of all techniques. METHODS: A simulated, mid-substance rupture was created 6 cm proximal to the calcaneal insertion in 15 fresh-frozen cadaveric Achilles tendons, obtaining 15 proximal and 12 distal samples. Specimens were tested independently and randomly allocated to different suture techniques: proximal fixation site groups: (A1) classic Dresden technique, (A2) modified Dresden, (A3) double modified Dresden; distal fixation groups: (B1) classic distal suture and (B2) modified distal suture. Repairs were subjected to a cyclic testing (1000 cycles of 50-200 N) and load to failure. Load to failure, cause of failure and tendon elongation was evaluated. Fischer’s test was used as statistical analysis. RESULTS: None of the proximal tendon and 7/12 of the distal samples failed in cyclic testing. The proximal fixation groups demonstrated significantly more strength than the distal groups (p< 0.05) with average failure loads of 598 N, 587 N and 710 N for groups A1, A2 and A3 respectively (A3 stronger than A1 and A2, p=0,035). Groups B1 and B2 failed on average at 416 N and 351 N respectively, p=0.24. The majority of all repairs failed in the suture- tendon interphase.Regarding elongation, no significant differences were found between groups (p=0.57). CONCLUSION: The distal fixation site in the Dresden percutaneous Achilles tendon repair is weaker than the proximal fixation site. A proximal modified suture configuration increased resistance to cyclic loading and load to failure significantly. A modification in the proximal and distal fixation sites can be suggested to improve repair strength and hopefully achieve a better outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86965062022-01-28 Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair Wagner, Pablo Wagner, Emilio Lopez, Mario Etchevers, Gaston Valencia, Oscar Guzman-Venegas, Rodrigo Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Different techniques have been described for Achilles Tendon Rupture repair, but no biomechanical evaluation have been performed separately for proximal and distal suturing techniques.The purpose of this study was to biomechanically analyze 3 proximal and 2 distal suture configurations during a simulated cyclic load and load to failure. It was hypothesized that proximal suturing technique was stronger than the distal one and that the modified double suturing technique was the strongest of all techniques. METHODS: A simulated, mid-substance rupture was created 6 cm proximal to the calcaneal insertion in 15 fresh-frozen cadaveric Achilles tendons, obtaining 15 proximal and 12 distal samples. Specimens were tested independently and randomly allocated to different suture techniques: proximal fixation site groups: (A1) classic Dresden technique, (A2) modified Dresden, (A3) double modified Dresden; distal fixation groups: (B1) classic distal suture and (B2) modified distal suture. Repairs were subjected to a cyclic testing (1000 cycles of 50-200 N) and load to failure. Load to failure, cause of failure and tendon elongation was evaluated. Fischer’s test was used as statistical analysis. RESULTS: None of the proximal tendon and 7/12 of the distal samples failed in cyclic testing. The proximal fixation groups demonstrated significantly more strength than the distal groups (p< 0.05) with average failure loads of 598 N, 587 N and 710 N for groups A1, A2 and A3 respectively (A3 stronger than A1 and A2, p=0,035). Groups B1 and B2 failed on average at 416 N and 351 N respectively, p=0.24. The majority of all repairs failed in the suture- tendon interphase.Regarding elongation, no significant differences were found between groups (p=0.57). CONCLUSION: The distal fixation site in the Dresden percutaneous Achilles tendon repair is weaker than the proximal fixation site. A proximal modified suture configuration increased resistance to cyclic loading and load to failure significantly. A modification in the proximal and distal fixation sites can be suggested to improve repair strength and hopefully achieve a better outcome. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8696506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00432 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Wagner, Pablo
Wagner, Emilio
Lopez, Mario
Etchevers, Gaston
Valencia, Oscar
Guzman-Venegas, Rodrigo
Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title_full Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title_fullStr Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title_full_unstemmed Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title_short Proximal and Distal Failure Site Analysis in Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair
title_sort proximal and distal failure site analysis in percutaneous achilles tendon rupture repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00432
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerpablo proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair
AT wagneremilio proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair
AT lopezmario proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair
AT etcheversgaston proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair
AT valenciaoscar proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair
AT guzmanvenegasrodrigo proximalanddistalfailuresiteanalysisinpercutaneousachillestendonrupturerepair