Cargando…

Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions

CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where a twisting or axial force is transmitted to the foot. Recently, new treatment options are being sought in order to use methods that allow a more physiologic fixation of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumfeld, Daniel, Nery, Caio, Baumfeld, Tiago, Wagner, Pablo, Prado, Marcelo, Wagner, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696695/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00101
_version_ 1784619873633042432
author Baumfeld, Daniel
Nery, Caio
Baumfeld, Tiago
Wagner, Pablo
Prado, Marcelo
Wagner, Emilio
author_facet Baumfeld, Daniel
Nery, Caio
Baumfeld, Tiago
Wagner, Pablo
Prado, Marcelo
Wagner, Emilio
author_sort Baumfeld, Daniel
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where a twisting or axial force is transmitted to the foot. Recently, new treatment options are being sought in order to use methods that allow a more physiologic fixation of this joint. The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability of a cadaveric Lisfranc injury model fixed with a synthetic neoligamentplasty in comparison to the traditional trans-articular screw fixation. METHODS: 24 fresh frozen lower leg cadaveric specimens were utilized. The medial (C1) and intermediate (C2) cuneiforms, first (M1) and second (M2) metatarsal bones were marked. A complete ligament injury was performed between C1-C2 and C1-M2 in 12 specimens (Group 1), and between C1-C2, C1-M2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 in 12 matched specimens (Group 2). The groups were further divided in fixation with screws (G1 Screws and G2 Screws) and with Tape (G1 Tape and G2 Tape). The tape fixation group used a fixation technique described by this group, using FiberTape (Arthrex, Inc.). After ligament lesion and fixation, the construct rigidity was measured with the help of a 3D Digitizer arm, comparing the distances between the marked bones over a stress condition (pronation and supination of the forefoot). RESULTS: Distance C1-C2 increased 3 mm after ligament injury (23% increase) with supination motion. C1-M2 increased 4 mm after ligament injury (21% increase) with pronation motion. Distances between C1-M1 and C2-M2 only changed in Group 2, increasing 3 mm (14%) and 2 mm (16%) respectively. Rigidity between C1-C2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 did not differ between the fixation with screws and with tape. The fixation with screws presented more rigidity in C1-M2 distance (p=0,03), but only in pronation stress. CONCLUSION: Pronation and supination motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot produces measurable joint displacements. Tape and Screws can produce the same rigidity after repairing Lisfrac Ligament injuries, except for distance C1-M2 in pronation stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86966952022-01-28 Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions Baumfeld, Daniel Nery, Caio Baumfeld, Tiago Wagner, Pablo Prado, Marcelo Wagner, Emilio Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where a twisting or axial force is transmitted to the foot. Recently, new treatment options are being sought in order to use methods that allow a more physiologic fixation of this joint. The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability of a cadaveric Lisfranc injury model fixed with a synthetic neoligamentplasty in comparison to the traditional trans-articular screw fixation. METHODS: 24 fresh frozen lower leg cadaveric specimens were utilized. The medial (C1) and intermediate (C2) cuneiforms, first (M1) and second (M2) metatarsal bones were marked. A complete ligament injury was performed between C1-C2 and C1-M2 in 12 specimens (Group 1), and between C1-C2, C1-M2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 in 12 matched specimens (Group 2). The groups were further divided in fixation with screws (G1 Screws and G2 Screws) and with Tape (G1 Tape and G2 Tape). The tape fixation group used a fixation technique described by this group, using FiberTape (Arthrex, Inc.). After ligament lesion and fixation, the construct rigidity was measured with the help of a 3D Digitizer arm, comparing the distances between the marked bones over a stress condition (pronation and supination of the forefoot). RESULTS: Distance C1-C2 increased 3 mm after ligament injury (23% increase) with supination motion. C1-M2 increased 4 mm after ligament injury (21% increase) with pronation motion. Distances between C1-M1 and C2-M2 only changed in Group 2, increasing 3 mm (14%) and 2 mm (16%) respectively. Rigidity between C1-C2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 did not differ between the fixation with screws and with tape. The fixation with screws presented more rigidity in C1-M2 distance (p=0,03), but only in pronation stress. CONCLUSION: Pronation and supination motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot produces measurable joint displacements. Tape and Screws can produce the same rigidity after repairing Lisfrac Ligament injuries, except for distance C1-M2 in pronation stress. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8696695/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00101 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Baumfeld, Daniel
Nery, Caio
Baumfeld, Tiago
Wagner, Pablo
Prado, Marcelo
Wagner, Emilio
Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title_full Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title_fullStr Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title_short Syntethic Neoligamentplasty with FiberTape has the Same Rigididy than Transarticular Screws in Lisfranc Subtle Lesions
title_sort syntethic neoligamentplasty with fibertape has the same rigididy than transarticular screws in lisfranc subtle lesions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696695/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00101
work_keys_str_mv AT baumfelddaniel syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions
AT nerycaio syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions
AT baumfeldtiago syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions
AT wagnerpablo syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions
AT pradomarcelo syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions
AT wagneremilio syntethicneoligamentplastywithfibertapehasthesamerigididythantransarticularscrewsinlisfrancsubtlelesions