Cargando…

Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait

CATEGORY: Ankle, Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of bilateral symmetry is used clinically to evaluate surgical and conservative treatment outcomes. However, the degree of symmetry and differences between sexes in ankle kinematics in healthy individuals remain unknown. Because relative mot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabrielli, Alexandra S., Maxim, Alexandra, Gale, Tom, LeVasseur, Clarissa, Hogan, MaCalus, Anderst, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00179
_version_ 1784619928664408064
author Gabrielli, Alexandra S.
Maxim, Alexandra
Gale, Tom
LeVasseur, Clarissa
Hogan, MaCalus
Anderst, William
author_facet Gabrielli, Alexandra S.
Maxim, Alexandra
Gale, Tom
LeVasseur, Clarissa
Hogan, MaCalus
Anderst, William
author_sort Gabrielli, Alexandra S.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle, Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of bilateral symmetry is used clinically to evaluate surgical and conservative treatment outcomes. However, the degree of symmetry and differences between sexes in ankle kinematics in healthy individuals remain unknown. Because relative motion between the tibia, talus and calcaneus cannot be accurately measured using conventional skin- mounted motion capture systems, biplane radiography is emerging as the preferred technique to measure in vivo ankle kinematics during functional activities. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to use biplane radiography to determine the degree of bilateral symmetry in ankle kinematics in healthy individuals and to identify sex-dependent differences in kinematics during the support phase of gait. It was hypothesized that rotational ankle range of motion (ROM) during gait is not different between males and females. METHODS: Twenty healthy individuals (10 male, 10 female, age 30.7 ± 6.3years) with no history of ankle injury provided consent to participate in this IRB-approved study. Each participant walked through a biplane radiography system 6 times at a self-selected pace (1.3±0.2 m/s). Synchronized radiographs of the ankle were collected at 100 images/second for 3 trials of each ankle (90 kV, 125 mA, 1 ms exposure/image). Motion of the tibia, talus and calcaneus was tracked using a validated model-based tracking process that matches 3D bone models to the radiographs. Anatomic coordinate systems were created and used to calculate ankle kinematics. All kinematics were converted to percent stance phase and averaged over all trials for each ankle. Bilateral symmetry was determined by calculating the average absolute difference between right and left ankle joint kinematics over the full support phase of gait. Differences between male and female rotational ROM were identified using unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: The average absolute side-to-side difference in tibio-talar joint rotations was 3.3° or less, while the average absolute side-to-side difference in subtalar joint rotations was 3.0° or less (Table 1A). For males and females, at the tibio-talar joint, the largest ROM was plantar-dorsiflexion, followed by internal/external rotation and then inversion/eversion (Table 1B). At the subalar joint, the largest ROM was inversion/eversion, with similar amounts of dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and internal/external rotation, on the order of 2° to 3°. Males demonstrated significantly less ROM in subtalar dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and tibio-talar internal/external rotation (Table 1B). CONCLUSION: The average side-to-side differences in healthy ankle ROM during gait are small, suggesting that the contralateral ankle may serve as a reference standard to assess kinematic outcomes after conservative or surgical treatments. The difference between male and female subtalar ROM (0.6°) may be too small to be functionally significant, however, sex differences in tibio- talar ROM appear large enough to merit consideration when assessing functional outcomes and designing ankle joint replacements. The results are limited to over-ground gait performed by relatively young and healthy adults and may not be applicable to other activities or older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8696923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86969232022-01-28 Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait Gabrielli, Alexandra S. Maxim, Alexandra Gale, Tom LeVasseur, Clarissa Hogan, MaCalus Anderst, William Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle, Hindfoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Restoration of bilateral symmetry is used clinically to evaluate surgical and conservative treatment outcomes. However, the degree of symmetry and differences between sexes in ankle kinematics in healthy individuals remain unknown. Because relative motion between the tibia, talus and calcaneus cannot be accurately measured using conventional skin- mounted motion capture systems, biplane radiography is emerging as the preferred technique to measure in vivo ankle kinematics during functional activities. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to use biplane radiography to determine the degree of bilateral symmetry in ankle kinematics in healthy individuals and to identify sex-dependent differences in kinematics during the support phase of gait. It was hypothesized that rotational ankle range of motion (ROM) during gait is not different between males and females. METHODS: Twenty healthy individuals (10 male, 10 female, age 30.7 ± 6.3years) with no history of ankle injury provided consent to participate in this IRB-approved study. Each participant walked through a biplane radiography system 6 times at a self-selected pace (1.3±0.2 m/s). Synchronized radiographs of the ankle were collected at 100 images/second for 3 trials of each ankle (90 kV, 125 mA, 1 ms exposure/image). Motion of the tibia, talus and calcaneus was tracked using a validated model-based tracking process that matches 3D bone models to the radiographs. Anatomic coordinate systems were created and used to calculate ankle kinematics. All kinematics were converted to percent stance phase and averaged over all trials for each ankle. Bilateral symmetry was determined by calculating the average absolute difference between right and left ankle joint kinematics over the full support phase of gait. Differences between male and female rotational ROM were identified using unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: The average absolute side-to-side difference in tibio-talar joint rotations was 3.3° or less, while the average absolute side-to-side difference in subtalar joint rotations was 3.0° or less (Table 1A). For males and females, at the tibio-talar joint, the largest ROM was plantar-dorsiflexion, followed by internal/external rotation and then inversion/eversion (Table 1B). At the subalar joint, the largest ROM was inversion/eversion, with similar amounts of dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and internal/external rotation, on the order of 2° to 3°. Males demonstrated significantly less ROM in subtalar dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and tibio-talar internal/external rotation (Table 1B). CONCLUSION: The average side-to-side differences in healthy ankle ROM during gait are small, suggesting that the contralateral ankle may serve as a reference standard to assess kinematic outcomes after conservative or surgical treatments. The difference between male and female subtalar ROM (0.6°) may be too small to be functionally significant, however, sex differences in tibio- talar ROM appear large enough to merit consideration when assessing functional outcomes and designing ankle joint replacements. The results are limited to over-ground gait performed by relatively young and healthy adults and may not be applicable to other activities or older adults. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8696923/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00179 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Gabrielli, Alexandra S.
Maxim, Alexandra
Gale, Tom
LeVasseur, Clarissa
Hogan, MaCalus
Anderst, William
Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title_full Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title_fullStr Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title_short Bilateral Symmetry and Sex Differences in Ankle Kinematics During the Stance Phase of Gait
title_sort bilateral symmetry and sex differences in ankle kinematics during the stance phase of gait
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8696923/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00179
work_keys_str_mv AT gabriellialexandras bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait
AT maximalexandra bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait
AT galetom bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait
AT levasseurclarissa bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait
AT hoganmacalus bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait
AT anderstwilliam bilateralsymmetryandsexdifferencesinanklekinematicsduringthestancephaseofgait