Cargando…

Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent

CATEGORY: Radiolography INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Weight-bearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to allow for more precise and valid measurement of bone position than conventional weight-bearing radiographs (R) and conventional CT without weight-bearing (CT). Time spent for image acquisition has been shown to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Martinus, Lintz, Francois, de Cesar Netto, Cesar, Barg, Alexej, Burssens, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697110/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00358
_version_ 1784619973292851200
author Richter, Martinus
Lintz, Francois
de Cesar Netto, Cesar
Barg, Alexej
Burssens, Arne
author_facet Richter, Martinus
Lintz, Francois
de Cesar Netto, Cesar
Barg, Alexej
Burssens, Arne
author_sort Richter, Martinus
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Radiolography INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Weight-bearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to allow for more precise and valid measurement of bone position than conventional weight-bearing radiographs (R) and conventional CT without weight-bearing (CT). Time spent for image acquisition has been shown to be lower for WBCT than for R and CT. Radiation dose for WBCT has been shown to be lower for WBCT than for CT. A WBCT device (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) had been brought on line July 1, 2013 in the first author´s foot and ankle department. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT in a foot and ankle center regarding time spent for image acquisition, radiation dose, disturbances, and cost effectiveness. METHODS: All patients who obtained WBCT (PedCAT)from July 1, 2013 until September 30, 2018 were included in the study. Age, sex, primary pathology were analyzed. The time spent for image acquisition (T) was calculated based on an analysis of previous study as follows: R (bilateral feet dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view), 902 seconds; CT (bilateral feet and ankle), 415 seconds; WBCT (bilateral), 207 seconds. Radiation dose (RD) per patient was calculated based on previous phantom measurements as follows: R, 1.4 uSv; CT, 25 uSv; WBCT 4.2 uSv1. For analysis cost effectiveness, device cost, reimbursement and working time cost of radiology technicians were taken into consideration within the local circumstances. All parameters were compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) with the parameters from 2012, i.e. before availability of WBCT. RESULTS: 10,087 WBCT scans were obtained in 4,702 patients (4,702 (47%) before treatment; 5,385 (53%) follow-up; mean age, 52.0; 40% male). Primary pathologies were forefoot deformities (n=916 (20%) and ankle instability/cartilage defect (n=534 (13%)), and hindfoot deformity (n=480 (10%)). 1,940 WBCT scans were obtained on average yearly, and 10.4 CTs (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 R and 254 CTs were obtained (R(+CT) group). Yearly RD was 4.4 uSv for WBCT group and 4.8 uSv for R(+CT) group (difference 0.4 uSv decrease with WBCT 8%, p<0.01). Yearly T was 127 hours in total (3.6 minutes per patient) for WBCT group and 959 hours in total (15.6 minutes per patient) for R(+CT) group (difference, 832 hours, decrease with WBCT, 87%, p<0.01). Yearly profit was 47,545/-816 Euro for WBCT/R+(CT). CONCLUSION: 10,087 WBCT scans in 4,702 patients as substitution of R(+CT) over a 5.3 year period at a foot and ankle center resulted in 8% decreased RD (minus 0.4 uSV on average per patient). Yearly T decreased 832 hours (87%) in total (12.0 minutes per patient). Yearly financial income increased more than 48,000 Euro in total (24 Euro per patient). RD decreased despite higher radiation dose for WBCT than for R alone, based on substitution of a high number of CTs by WBCT. Other centers with low usage of CT might not decrease RD by substituting R alone by WBCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86971102022-01-28 Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent Richter, Martinus Lintz, Francois de Cesar Netto, Cesar Barg, Alexej Burssens, Arne Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Radiolography INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Weight-bearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to allow for more precise and valid measurement of bone position than conventional weight-bearing radiographs (R) and conventional CT without weight-bearing (CT). Time spent for image acquisition has been shown to be lower for WBCT than for R and CT. Radiation dose for WBCT has been shown to be lower for WBCT than for CT. A WBCT device (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) had been brought on line July 1, 2013 in the first author´s foot and ankle department. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT in a foot and ankle center regarding time spent for image acquisition, radiation dose, disturbances, and cost effectiveness. METHODS: All patients who obtained WBCT (PedCAT)from July 1, 2013 until September 30, 2018 were included in the study. Age, sex, primary pathology were analyzed. The time spent for image acquisition (T) was calculated based on an analysis of previous study as follows: R (bilateral feet dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view), 902 seconds; CT (bilateral feet and ankle), 415 seconds; WBCT (bilateral), 207 seconds. Radiation dose (RD) per patient was calculated based on previous phantom measurements as follows: R, 1.4 uSv; CT, 25 uSv; WBCT 4.2 uSv1. For analysis cost effectiveness, device cost, reimbursement and working time cost of radiology technicians were taken into consideration within the local circumstances. All parameters were compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) with the parameters from 2012, i.e. before availability of WBCT. RESULTS: 10,087 WBCT scans were obtained in 4,702 patients (4,702 (47%) before treatment; 5,385 (53%) follow-up; mean age, 52.0; 40% male). Primary pathologies were forefoot deformities (n=916 (20%) and ankle instability/cartilage defect (n=534 (13%)), and hindfoot deformity (n=480 (10%)). 1,940 WBCT scans were obtained on average yearly, and 10.4 CTs (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 R and 254 CTs were obtained (R(+CT) group). Yearly RD was 4.4 uSv for WBCT group and 4.8 uSv for R(+CT) group (difference 0.4 uSv decrease with WBCT 8%, p<0.01). Yearly T was 127 hours in total (3.6 minutes per patient) for WBCT group and 959 hours in total (15.6 minutes per patient) for R(+CT) group (difference, 832 hours, decrease with WBCT, 87%, p<0.01). Yearly profit was 47,545/-816 Euro for WBCT/R+(CT). CONCLUSION: 10,087 WBCT scans in 4,702 patients as substitution of R(+CT) over a 5.3 year period at a foot and ankle center resulted in 8% decreased RD (minus 0.4 uSV on average per patient). Yearly T decreased 832 hours (87%) in total (12.0 minutes per patient). Yearly financial income increased more than 48,000 Euro in total (24 Euro per patient). RD decreased despite higher radiation dose for WBCT than for R alone, based on substitution of a high number of CTs by WBCT. Other centers with low usage of CT might not decrease RD by substituting R alone by WBCT. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8697110/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00358 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Richter, Martinus
Lintz, Francois
de Cesar Netto, Cesar
Barg, Alexej
Burssens, Arne
Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title_full Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title_fullStr Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title_full_unstemmed Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title_short Results of a 5 Year, 10,000 Scans Experience with Weight-Bearing CT. Impact on Costs, Radiation Exposure and Time Spent
title_sort results of a 5 year, 10,000 scans experience with weight-bearing ct. impact on costs, radiation exposure and time spent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697110/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00358
work_keys_str_mv AT richtermartinus resultsofa5year10000scansexperiencewithweightbearingctimpactoncostsradiationexposureandtimespent
AT lintzfrancois resultsofa5year10000scansexperiencewithweightbearingctimpactoncostsradiationexposureandtimespent
AT decesarnettocesar resultsofa5year10000scansexperiencewithweightbearingctimpactoncostsradiationexposureandtimespent
AT bargalexej resultsofa5year10000scansexperiencewithweightbearingctimpactoncostsradiationexposureandtimespent
AT burssensarne resultsofa5year10000scansexperiencewithweightbearingctimpactoncostsradiationexposureandtimespent