Cargando…
A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697154/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006 |
_version_ | 1784619984357425152 |
---|---|
author | Giza, Eric Oliver, Todd Barousse, Patrick S. Allen, Tyler Shelton, Trevor Sarcon, Aida K. Sathy, Ashoke Faerber, Wade Lin, Johnny L. Stannard, James P. Crist, Brett Rocca, Gregory J. Della Ronan, James Kreulen, Christopher D. |
author_facet | Giza, Eric Oliver, Todd Barousse, Patrick S. Allen, Tyler Shelton, Trevor Sarcon, Aida K. Sathy, Ashoke Faerber, Wade Lin, Johnny L. Stannard, James P. Crist, Brett Rocca, Gregory J. Della Ronan, James Kreulen, Christopher D. |
author_sort | Giza, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation with either screws or suture button devices. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of syndesmotic injuries treated surgically with either screws or suture button devices. It was hypothesized that suture button fixation would provide equal clinical results with less need for hardware removal. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two surgical interventions for treatment of acute syndesmotic injury. Subjects were placed into either screw fixation or the Suture-button device group. Subjects with clinical signs or radiographic evidence of syndesmotic injury were asked to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria was ages 18 to 65 years old with confirmed syndesmotic instability. The primary outcomes of the study were VAS scores (activity, pain, satisfaction) and FFI scores (pain, disability, activity) which were collected at preoperative state, 6 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two subjects received Suture-button fixation (49%) and 33 received screw fixation (51%). VAS scores and FFI scores for subjects treated with the Suture-button device or screw fixation comparing preoperative, six-week, and 12-month scores all showed clinical improvement. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (p >0.05).Nine subjects (27%) in the syndesmotic screw fixation group experienced adverse events, and only one subject (3%) in the suture-button group had adverse event. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical outcomes suggest that both syndesmotic screws and suture-button devices are effective treatment options to address acute syndesmotic injuries. In the short-term (12-months), suture-button fixation resulted in significantly less adverse events compared to syndesmotic screw fixation group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8697154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86971542022-01-28 A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation Giza, Eric Oliver, Todd Barousse, Patrick S. Allen, Tyler Shelton, Trevor Sarcon, Aida K. Sathy, Ashoke Faerber, Wade Lin, Johnny L. Stannard, James P. Crist, Brett Rocca, Gregory J. Della Ronan, James Kreulen, Christopher D. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation with either screws or suture button devices. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of syndesmotic injuries treated surgically with either screws or suture button devices. It was hypothesized that suture button fixation would provide equal clinical results with less need for hardware removal. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two surgical interventions for treatment of acute syndesmotic injury. Subjects were placed into either screw fixation or the Suture-button device group. Subjects with clinical signs or radiographic evidence of syndesmotic injury were asked to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria was ages 18 to 65 years old with confirmed syndesmotic instability. The primary outcomes of the study were VAS scores (activity, pain, satisfaction) and FFI scores (pain, disability, activity) which were collected at preoperative state, 6 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two subjects received Suture-button fixation (49%) and 33 received screw fixation (51%). VAS scores and FFI scores for subjects treated with the Suture-button device or screw fixation comparing preoperative, six-week, and 12-month scores all showed clinical improvement. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (p >0.05).Nine subjects (27%) in the syndesmotic screw fixation group experienced adverse events, and only one subject (3%) in the suture-button group had adverse event. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical outcomes suggest that both syndesmotic screws and suture-button devices are effective treatment options to address acute syndesmotic injuries. In the short-term (12-months), suture-button fixation resulted in significantly less adverse events compared to syndesmotic screw fixation group. SAGE Publications 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8697154/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Giza, Eric Oliver, Todd Barousse, Patrick S. Allen, Tyler Shelton, Trevor Sarcon, Aida K. Sathy, Ashoke Faerber, Wade Lin, Johnny L. Stannard, James P. Crist, Brett Rocca, Gregory J. Della Ronan, James Kreulen, Christopher D. A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title | A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title_full | A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title_fullStr | A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title_short | A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation |
title_sort | prospective, randomized investigation of syndesmosis injury fixation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697154/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gizaeric aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT olivertodd aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT baroussepatricks aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT allentyler aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sheltontrevor aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sarconaidak aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sathyashoke aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT faerberwade aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT linjohnnyl aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT stannardjamesp aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT cristbrett aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT roccagregoryjdella aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT ronanjames aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT kreulenchristopherd aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT gizaeric prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT olivertodd prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT baroussepatricks prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT allentyler prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sheltontrevor prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sarconaidak prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT sathyashoke prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT faerberwade prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT linjohnnyl prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT stannardjamesp prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT cristbrett prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT roccagregoryjdella prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT ronanjames prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation AT kreulenchristopherd prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation |