Cargando…

A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation

CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giza, Eric, Oliver, Todd, Barousse, Patrick S., Allen, Tyler, Shelton, Trevor, Sarcon, Aida K., Sathy, Ashoke, Faerber, Wade, Lin, Johnny L., Stannard, James P., Crist, Brett, Rocca, Gregory J. Della, Ronan, James, Kreulen, Christopher D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697154/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006
_version_ 1784619984357425152
author Giza, Eric
Oliver, Todd
Barousse, Patrick S.
Allen, Tyler
Shelton, Trevor
Sarcon, Aida K.
Sathy, Ashoke
Faerber, Wade
Lin, Johnny L.
Stannard, James P.
Crist, Brett
Rocca, Gregory J. Della
Ronan, James
Kreulen, Christopher D.
author_facet Giza, Eric
Oliver, Todd
Barousse, Patrick S.
Allen, Tyler
Shelton, Trevor
Sarcon, Aida K.
Sathy, Ashoke
Faerber, Wade
Lin, Johnny L.
Stannard, James P.
Crist, Brett
Rocca, Gregory J. Della
Ronan, James
Kreulen, Christopher D.
author_sort Giza, Eric
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation with either screws or suture button devices. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of syndesmotic injuries treated surgically with either screws or suture button devices. It was hypothesized that suture button fixation would provide equal clinical results with less need for hardware removal. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two surgical interventions for treatment of acute syndesmotic injury. Subjects were placed into either screw fixation or the Suture-button device group. Subjects with clinical signs or radiographic evidence of syndesmotic injury were asked to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria was ages 18 to 65 years old with confirmed syndesmotic instability. The primary outcomes of the study were VAS scores (activity, pain, satisfaction) and FFI scores (pain, disability, activity) which were collected at preoperative state, 6 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two subjects received Suture-button fixation (49%) and 33 received screw fixation (51%). VAS scores and FFI scores for subjects treated with the Suture-button device or screw fixation comparing preoperative, six-week, and 12-month scores all showed clinical improvement. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (p >0.05).Nine subjects (27%) in the syndesmotic screw fixation group experienced adverse events, and only one subject (3%) in the suture-button group had adverse event. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical outcomes suggest that both syndesmotic screws and suture-button devices are effective treatment options to address acute syndesmotic injuries. In the short-term (12-months), suture-button fixation resulted in significantly less adverse events compared to syndesmotic screw fixation group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86971542022-01-28 A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation Giza, Eric Oliver, Todd Barousse, Patrick S. Allen, Tyler Shelton, Trevor Sarcon, Aida K. Sathy, Ashoke Faerber, Wade Lin, Johnny L. Stannard, James P. Crist, Brett Rocca, Gregory J. Della Ronan, James Kreulen, Christopher D. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Syndesmotic disruption occurs in 10 to 13% of all ankle fractures. It is present in 15 cases per 100,000 of the general population. There has been debate on the best treatment for syndesmotic injuries. The typical surgical treatments include fixation with either screws or suture button devices. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of syndesmotic injuries treated surgically with either screws or suture button devices. It was hypothesized that suture button fixation would provide equal clinical results with less need for hardware removal. METHODS: This was a multi-center, randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two surgical interventions for treatment of acute syndesmotic injury. Subjects were placed into either screw fixation or the Suture-button device group. Subjects with clinical signs or radiographic evidence of syndesmotic injury were asked to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria was ages 18 to 65 years old with confirmed syndesmotic instability. The primary outcomes of the study were VAS scores (activity, pain, satisfaction) and FFI scores (pain, disability, activity) which were collected at preoperative state, 6 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty-five subjects were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two subjects received Suture-button fixation (49%) and 33 received screw fixation (51%). VAS scores and FFI scores for subjects treated with the Suture-button device or screw fixation comparing preoperative, six-week, and 12-month scores all showed clinical improvement. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (p >0.05).Nine subjects (27%) in the syndesmotic screw fixation group experienced adverse events, and only one subject (3%) in the suture-button group had adverse event. CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical outcomes suggest that both syndesmotic screws and suture-button devices are effective treatment options to address acute syndesmotic injuries. In the short-term (12-months), suture-button fixation resulted in significantly less adverse events compared to syndesmotic screw fixation group. SAGE Publications 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8697154/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Giza, Eric
Oliver, Todd
Barousse, Patrick S.
Allen, Tyler
Shelton, Trevor
Sarcon, Aida K.
Sathy, Ashoke
Faerber, Wade
Lin, Johnny L.
Stannard, James P.
Crist, Brett
Rocca, Gregory J. Della
Ronan, James
Kreulen, Christopher D.
A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title_full A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title_fullStr A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title_short A Prospective, Randomized Investigation of Syndesmosis Injury Fixation
title_sort prospective, randomized investigation of syndesmosis injury fixation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697154/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420S00006
work_keys_str_mv AT gizaeric aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT olivertodd aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT baroussepatricks aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT allentyler aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sheltontrevor aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sarconaidak aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sathyashoke aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT faerberwade aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT linjohnnyl aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT stannardjamesp aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT cristbrett aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT roccagregoryjdella aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT ronanjames aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT kreulenchristopherd aprospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT gizaeric prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT olivertodd prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT baroussepatricks prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT allentyler prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sheltontrevor prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sarconaidak prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT sathyashoke prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT faerberwade prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT linjohnnyl prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT stannardjamesp prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT cristbrett prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT roccagregoryjdella prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT ronanjames prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation
AT kreulenchristopherd prospectiverandomizedinvestigationofsyndesmosisinjuryfixation