Cargando…

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation

BACKGROUND: Previous Level I studies show promising results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. A recent independent retrospective review has put those results into question, however. The purpose of this article is to report patient-report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engasser, William M., Coetzee, J. Chris, Ebeling, Patrick B., Den Hartog, Bryan D., Seybold, Jeffrey D., Holthusen, Scott M., McGaver, Rebecca Stone, Seiffert, Kayla J., Giveans, M. Russell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420930691
_version_ 1784620010607476736
author Engasser, William M.
Coetzee, J. Chris
Ebeling, Patrick B.
Den Hartog, Bryan D.
Seybold, Jeffrey D.
Holthusen, Scott M.
McGaver, Rebecca Stone
Seiffert, Kayla J.
Giveans, M. Russell
author_facet Engasser, William M.
Coetzee, J. Chris
Ebeling, Patrick B.
Den Hartog, Bryan D.
Seybold, Jeffrey D.
Holthusen, Scott M.
McGaver, Rebecca Stone
Seiffert, Kayla J.
Giveans, M. Russell
author_sort Engasser, William M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous Level I studies show promising results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. A recent independent retrospective review has put those results into question, however. The purpose of this article is to report patient-reported outcomes and early complications using this implant so as to add to the paucity of data in the literature regarding this implant. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus from July 2017 to November 2018. Data collected included patient demographics, radiographic grading, and outcomes: Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), visual analog scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and complications. Fifty-four patients (59 feet) with an average age of 57.6 (range, 39-78) years were analyzed. The average latest follow-up was 18.9 (range, 3-31.3) months. Body mass index was 26.7 (range, 18.7-35.2). None were diabetic and 5 were smokers. RESULTS: The mean outcome improvements were 6.5 points (VR-12 Physical), 17.2 points (FAAM ADL), 27.4 points (FAAM Sport), and 18.4 points (VAS) (P < .01 for each). Scores were significantly improved from preoperatively to most recent follow-up for FAAM ADL (71.0 vs 88.2 points), FAAM Sports (44.6 vs 72.0 points), and VAS (49.4 vs 31.0) (P < .01). Overall, 72.5% patients would definitely or probably have the operation again. Ten patients (18.5%) went on to have revision surgery. Of these, 7 patients were revised to an arthrodesis, and 1 metal hemiarthroplasty and 2 implants were removed because of infection. CONCLUSION: Synthetic cartilage implantation for the treatment of hallux rigidus demonstrated improved pain and outcome scores at short-term follow-up. Reoperation and conversion to fusion rates were comparable to prior studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86972632022-01-28 Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation Engasser, William M. Coetzee, J. Chris Ebeling, Patrick B. Den Hartog, Bryan D. Seybold, Jeffrey D. Holthusen, Scott M. McGaver, Rebecca Stone Seiffert, Kayla J. Giveans, M. Russell Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: Previous Level I studies show promising results for the use of a hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) for the treatment of hallux rigidus. A recent independent retrospective review has put those results into question, however. The purpose of this article is to report patient-reported outcomes and early complications using this implant so as to add to the paucity of data in the literature regarding this implant. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant for the treatment of hallux rigidus from July 2017 to November 2018. Data collected included patient demographics, radiographic grading, and outcomes: Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), visual analog scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and complications. Fifty-four patients (59 feet) with an average age of 57.6 (range, 39-78) years were analyzed. The average latest follow-up was 18.9 (range, 3-31.3) months. Body mass index was 26.7 (range, 18.7-35.2). None were diabetic and 5 were smokers. RESULTS: The mean outcome improvements were 6.5 points (VR-12 Physical), 17.2 points (FAAM ADL), 27.4 points (FAAM Sport), and 18.4 points (VAS) (P < .01 for each). Scores were significantly improved from preoperatively to most recent follow-up for FAAM ADL (71.0 vs 88.2 points), FAAM Sports (44.6 vs 72.0 points), and VAS (49.4 vs 31.0) (P < .01). Overall, 72.5% patients would definitely or probably have the operation again. Ten patients (18.5%) went on to have revision surgery. Of these, 7 patients were revised to an arthrodesis, and 1 metal hemiarthroplasty and 2 implants were removed because of infection. CONCLUSION: Synthetic cartilage implantation for the treatment of hallux rigidus demonstrated improved pain and outcome scores at short-term follow-up. Reoperation and conversion to fusion rates were comparable to prior studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. SAGE Publications 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8697263/ /pubmed/35097387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420930691 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Engasser, William M.
Coetzee, J. Chris
Ebeling, Patrick B.
Den Hartog, Bryan D.
Seybold, Jeffrey D.
Holthusen, Scott M.
McGaver, Rebecca Stone
Seiffert, Kayla J.
Giveans, M. Russell
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title_full Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title_short Patient-Reported Outcomes and Early Complications After Synthetic Cartilage Device Implantation
title_sort patient-reported outcomes and early complications after synthetic cartilage device implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420930691
work_keys_str_mv AT engasserwilliamm patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT coetzeejchris patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT ebelingpatrickb patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT denhartogbryand patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT seyboldjeffreyd patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT holthusenscottm patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT mcgaverrebeccastone patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT seiffertkaylaj patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation
AT giveansmrussell patientreportedoutcomesandearlycomplicationsaftersyntheticcartilagedeviceimplantation