Cargando…

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing

CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics, Sports, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where twisting forces are applied. Cadaveric models have been used to evaluate injury patterns and fixation methods, but a frequent limitation has been historicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Emilio, Wagner, Pablo, Baumfeld, Daniel, Baumfeld, Tiago, Prado, Marcelo, Nery, Caio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00430
_version_ 1784620016344236032
author Wagner, Emilio
Wagner, Pablo
Baumfeld, Daniel
Baumfeld, Tiago
Prado, Marcelo
Nery, Caio
author_facet Wagner, Emilio
Wagner, Pablo
Baumfeld, Daniel
Baumfeld, Tiago
Prado, Marcelo
Nery, Caio
author_sort Wagner, Emilio
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics, Sports, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where twisting forces are applied. Cadaveric models have been used to evaluate injury patterns and fixation methods, but a frequent limitation has been historically the small amount of joint displacement after injury, which hinders a correct evaluation of the damage degree and reconstruction effectiveness. Our hypothesis was that adding pronation and supination motion to a cadaveric model would produce reliable and measurable joint displacements. METHODS: 24 fresh frozen lower leg cadaveric specimens were utilized. The medial (C1), intermediate (C2) cuneiforms, first (M1) and second (M2) metatarsal bones were marked. A complete ligament injury was performed between C1-C2 and C1-M2 in 12 specimens (Group 1), and between C1-C2, C1-M2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 in 12 matched specimens (Group 2). Supination and pronation motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot was obtained through internal and external rotation of the tíbia, using an Instrom machine. A 3D Digitizer was used to measure distances between the bones already mentioned. RESULTS: Distance C1-C2 increased 3 mm after ligament injury with supination motion (p<0.05). Distance C1-M2 increased 4 mm after ligament injury with pronation motion (p<0.05). Distances between C1-M1 and C2-M2 only changed in Group 2, increasing 3 mm and 2 mm respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Pronation and supination motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot produces measurable joint displacements in a cadaveric Lisfranc injury model. We believe this new method for testing cadaveric lisfranc injuries will allow a better understanding of injury patterns and repair or reconstruction techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86972872022-01-28 Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing Wagner, Emilio Wagner, Pablo Baumfeld, Daniel Baumfeld, Tiago Prado, Marcelo Nery, Caio Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Basic Sciences/Biologics, Sports, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc joint injuries occur due to direct or indirect trauma, where twisting forces are applied. Cadaveric models have been used to evaluate injury patterns and fixation methods, but a frequent limitation has been historically the small amount of joint displacement after injury, which hinders a correct evaluation of the damage degree and reconstruction effectiveness. Our hypothesis was that adding pronation and supination motion to a cadaveric model would produce reliable and measurable joint displacements. METHODS: 24 fresh frozen lower leg cadaveric specimens were utilized. The medial (C1), intermediate (C2) cuneiforms, first (M1) and second (M2) metatarsal bones were marked. A complete ligament injury was performed between C1-C2 and C1-M2 in 12 specimens (Group 1), and between C1-C2, C1-M2, C1-M1 and C2-M2 in 12 matched specimens (Group 2). Supination and pronation motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot was obtained through internal and external rotation of the tíbia, using an Instrom machine. A 3D Digitizer was used to measure distances between the bones already mentioned. RESULTS: Distance C1-C2 increased 3 mm after ligament injury with supination motion (p<0.05). Distance C1-M2 increased 4 mm after ligament injury with pronation motion (p<0.05). Distances between C1-M1 and C2-M2 only changed in Group 2, increasing 3 mm and 2 mm respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Pronation and supination motion of the forefoot relative to the hindfoot produces measurable joint displacements in a cadaveric Lisfranc injury model. We believe this new method for testing cadaveric lisfranc injuries will allow a better understanding of injury patterns and repair or reconstruction techniques. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8697287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00430 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Wagner, Emilio
Wagner, Pablo
Baumfeld, Daniel
Baumfeld, Tiago
Prado, Marcelo
Nery, Caio
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title_full Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title_short Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Lisfranc Injury Cadaveric Model Using Supination and Pronation Testing
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of a novel lisfranc injury cadaveric model using supination and pronation testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00430
work_keys_str_mv AT wagneremilio biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting
AT wagnerpablo biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting
AT baumfelddaniel biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting
AT baumfeldtiago biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting
AT pradomarcelo biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting
AT nerycaio biomechanicalevaluationofanovellisfrancinjurycadavericmodelusingsupinationandpronationtesting