Cargando…

Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)

CATEGORY: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Background: A shift and increase in mean tibiotalar contact pressure has been demonstrated in simulated syndesmotic injuries. The effect of screw fixation and/or suspensory fixation on restoration of pressure mechanics in the setting of a sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Eric, Bedigrew, Katherine, Behn, Anthony, Chou, Loretta, Hunt, Kenneth, Palanca, Ariel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697297/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00329
_version_ 1784620018978258944
author Pang, Eric
Bedigrew, Katherine
Behn, Anthony
Chou, Loretta
Hunt, Kenneth
Palanca, Ariel
author_facet Pang, Eric
Bedigrew, Katherine
Behn, Anthony
Chou, Loretta
Hunt, Kenneth
Palanca, Ariel
author_sort Pang, Eric
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Background: A shift and increase in mean tibiotalar contact pressure has been demonstrated in simulated syndesmotic injuries. The effect of screw fixation and/or suspensory fixation on restoration of pressure mechanics in the setting of a syndesmotic injury remains largely unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the contact mechanics of the tibiotalar joint following syndesmosis fixation with screws versus a flexible fixation device for complete syndesmotic injury. METHODS: Six matched pairs of cadaveric below knee specimens were randomly assigned fixation with either two 3.5 mm cortical screws or two TightRopes™ (Arthrex). Motion capture trackers were fixed to the tibia, fibula, and talus and a pressure sensor was placed in the tibiotalar joint. Each specimen was first tested intact with an axial compressive load followed by external rotation torque while maintaining axial compression. The syndesmosic ligaments were then completely sectioned and subsequently repaired with either two TightRopes™ or two screws and the protocol was repeated. Mean contact pressure (MCP), peak pressure (PP), reduction in contact area (CA), translation of the center of pressure (COP), and relative talar and fibular motion were calculated. Specimens were then cyclically loaded in external rotation to failure. Comparisons were made using paired t-tests and/or Welch’s t-tests. RESULTS: No differences in MCP, PP, or CA were observed between the intact and instrumented states during AL alone for either group. MCP relative to intact testing was increased in the screw group at 5 Nm (4.8±4.1 MPa vs 3.6±0.8 MPa, p=0.033) and 7.5 Nm torque (6.2±1.4 MPa vs 4.2±1.2 MPa, p=0.024). Likewise, PP was increased in TightRope™ group at 7.5 Nm torque (14.4±3.1 MPa vs 10.8±1.6 MPa, p=0.046). There was no change in COP in the TightRope™ group at any threshold; however, at every threshold tested there was significant medial and anterior COP translation in the screw group relative to the intact state. CONCLUSION: Either screws or TightRope™ fixation is adequate with AL alone. With lower amounts of torque, the TightRope™ group exhibits contact and pressure mechanics that more closely match native mechanics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86972972022-01-28 Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™) Pang, Eric Bedigrew, Katherine Behn, Anthony Chou, Loretta Hunt, Kenneth Palanca, Ariel Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Trauma INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Background: A shift and increase in mean tibiotalar contact pressure has been demonstrated in simulated syndesmotic injuries. The effect of screw fixation and/or suspensory fixation on restoration of pressure mechanics in the setting of a syndesmotic injury remains largely unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine the contact mechanics of the tibiotalar joint following syndesmosis fixation with screws versus a flexible fixation device for complete syndesmotic injury. METHODS: Six matched pairs of cadaveric below knee specimens were randomly assigned fixation with either two 3.5 mm cortical screws or two TightRopes™ (Arthrex). Motion capture trackers were fixed to the tibia, fibula, and talus and a pressure sensor was placed in the tibiotalar joint. Each specimen was first tested intact with an axial compressive load followed by external rotation torque while maintaining axial compression. The syndesmosic ligaments were then completely sectioned and subsequently repaired with either two TightRopes™ or two screws and the protocol was repeated. Mean contact pressure (MCP), peak pressure (PP), reduction in contact area (CA), translation of the center of pressure (COP), and relative talar and fibular motion were calculated. Specimens were then cyclically loaded in external rotation to failure. Comparisons were made using paired t-tests and/or Welch’s t-tests. RESULTS: No differences in MCP, PP, or CA were observed between the intact and instrumented states during AL alone for either group. MCP relative to intact testing was increased in the screw group at 5 Nm (4.8±4.1 MPa vs 3.6±0.8 MPa, p=0.033) and 7.5 Nm torque (6.2±1.4 MPa vs 4.2±1.2 MPa, p=0.024). Likewise, PP was increased in TightRope™ group at 7.5 Nm torque (14.4±3.1 MPa vs 10.8±1.6 MPa, p=0.046). There was no change in COP in the TightRope™ group at any threshold; however, at every threshold tested there was significant medial and anterior COP translation in the screw group relative to the intact state. CONCLUSION: Either screws or TightRope™ fixation is adequate with AL alone. With lower amounts of torque, the TightRope™ group exhibits contact and pressure mechanics that more closely match native mechanics. SAGE Publications 2019-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8697297/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00329 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Pang, Eric
Bedigrew, Katherine
Behn, Anthony
Chou, Loretta
Hunt, Kenneth
Palanca, Ariel
Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title_full Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title_fullStr Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title_full_unstemmed Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title_short Tibiotalar Joint Contact Mechanics Following Syndesmosis Fixation with Screws Versus a Flexible Fixation Device (TightRope™)
title_sort tibiotalar joint contact mechanics following syndesmosis fixation with screws versus a flexible fixation device (tightrope™)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697297/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011419S00329
work_keys_str_mv AT pangeric tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope
AT bedigrewkatherine tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope
AT behnanthony tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope
AT chouloretta tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope
AT huntkenneth tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope
AT palancaariel tibiotalarjointcontactmechanicsfollowingsyndesmosisfixationwithscrewsversusaflexiblefixationdevicetightrope