Cargando…
Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216 |
_version_ | 1784620092397453312 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Robin T. Bishop, Pamela R. Lenhart, Suzanne Gross, Louis J. Sturner, Kelly |
author_facet | Taylor, Robin T. Bishop, Pamela R. Lenhart, Suzanne Gross, Louis J. Sturner, Kelly |
author_sort | Taylor, Robin T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA included obtaining input from a large network of scientists and educators as well as students in calculus and biocalculus courses to accumulate evidential support of the instrument’s content validity and response processes of test takers. We used the Rasch model to examine the internal structure of scores from students who have experienced calculus instruction in the two methods. The analysis involved three populations (Calculus 1, Calculus 2, and Biocalculus) for which the Calc 1 and Calc 2 students were not exposed to calculus concepts in a life science setting, while the Biocalculus students were presented concepts explicitly with a life science emphasis. Overall, our findings indicate that the BCA has reasonable validity properties, providing a diagnostic tool to assess the relative learning success and calculus comprehension of undergraduate biology majors from alternative methods of instruction that do or do not emphasize life science examples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8697647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86976472021-12-27 Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) Taylor, Robin T. Bishop, Pamela R. Lenhart, Suzanne Gross, Louis J. Sturner, Kelly CBE Life Sci Educ Article We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA included obtaining input from a large network of scientists and educators as well as students in calculus and biocalculus courses to accumulate evidential support of the instrument’s content validity and response processes of test takers. We used the Rasch model to examine the internal structure of scores from students who have experienced calculus instruction in the two methods. The analysis involved three populations (Calculus 1, Calculus 2, and Biocalculus) for which the Calc 1 and Calc 2 students were not exposed to calculus concepts in a life science setting, while the Biocalculus students were presented concepts explicitly with a life science emphasis. Overall, our findings indicate that the BCA has reasonable validity properties, providing a diagnostic tool to assess the relative learning success and calculus comprehension of undergraduate biology majors from alternative methods of instruction that do or do not emphasize life science examples. American Society for Cell Biology 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8697647/ /pubmed/32058833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216 Text en © 2020 R. T. Taylor et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2020 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Article Taylor, Robin T. Bishop, Pamela R. Lenhart, Suzanne Gross, Louis J. Sturner, Kelly Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title | Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title_full | Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title_fullStr | Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title_short | Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) |
title_sort | development of the biocalculus assessment (bca) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorrobint developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca AT bishoppamelar developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca AT lenhartsuzanne developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca AT grosslouisj developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca AT sturnerkelly developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca |