Cargando…

Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)

We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Robin T., Bishop, Pamela R., Lenhart, Suzanne, Gross, Louis J., Sturner, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216
_version_ 1784620092397453312
author Taylor, Robin T.
Bishop, Pamela R.
Lenhart, Suzanne
Gross, Louis J.
Sturner, Kelly
author_facet Taylor, Robin T.
Bishop, Pamela R.
Lenhart, Suzanne
Gross, Louis J.
Sturner, Kelly
author_sort Taylor, Robin T.
collection PubMed
description We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA included obtaining input from a large network of scientists and educators as well as students in calculus and biocalculus courses to accumulate evidential support of the instrument’s content validity and response processes of test takers. We used the Rasch model to examine the internal structure of scores from students who have experienced calculus instruction in the two methods. The analysis involved three populations (Calculus 1, Calculus 2, and Biocalculus) for which the Calc 1 and Calc 2 students were not exposed to calculus concepts in a life science setting, while the Biocalculus students were presented concepts explicitly with a life science emphasis. Overall, our findings indicate that the BCA has reasonable validity properties, providing a diagnostic tool to assess the relative learning success and calculus comprehension of undergraduate biology majors from alternative methods of instruction that do or do not emphasize life science examples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86976472021-12-27 Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA) Taylor, Robin T. Bishop, Pamela R. Lenhart, Suzanne Gross, Louis J. Sturner, Kelly CBE Life Sci Educ Article We describe the development and initial validity assessment of the 20-item BioCalculus Assessment (BCA), with the objective of comparing undergraduate life science students’ understanding of calculus concepts in different courses with alternative emphases (with and without focus on biological applications). The development process of the BCA included obtaining input from a large network of scientists and educators as well as students in calculus and biocalculus courses to accumulate evidential support of the instrument’s content validity and response processes of test takers. We used the Rasch model to examine the internal structure of scores from students who have experienced calculus instruction in the two methods. The analysis involved three populations (Calculus 1, Calculus 2, and Biocalculus) for which the Calc 1 and Calc 2 students were not exposed to calculus concepts in a life science setting, while the Biocalculus students were presented concepts explicitly with a life science emphasis. Overall, our findings indicate that the BCA has reasonable validity properties, providing a diagnostic tool to assess the relative learning success and calculus comprehension of undergraduate biology majors from alternative methods of instruction that do or do not emphasize life science examples. American Society for Cell Biology 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8697647/ /pubmed/32058833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216 Text en © 2020 R. T. Taylor et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2020 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Taylor, Robin T.
Bishop, Pamela R.
Lenhart, Suzanne
Gross, Louis J.
Sturner, Kelly
Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title_full Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title_fullStr Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title_full_unstemmed Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title_short Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA)
title_sort development of the biocalculus assessment (bca)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorrobint developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca
AT bishoppamelar developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca
AT lenhartsuzanne developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca
AT grosslouisj developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca
AT sturnerkelly developmentofthebiocalculusassessmentbca