Chicken Immune Cell Assay to Model Adaptive Immune Responses In Vitro

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Knowledge about the modes of action of immunomodulating compounds such as pathogens, drugs, or feed additives, e.g., probiotics, will allow the development of targeted nutrition strategies, prevent infectious diseases and the usage of antimicrobials, and promote the health of animals. To investigate the mechanisms of action of immunomodulating compounds, controlled in vitro systems using freshly isolated immune cells from blood represent a promising alternative to animal experiments. Immune cell isolation from the blood of chickens is a complex and difficult process since the immune cell fractions are significantly contaminated with red blood cells and platelets. To our knowledge, a robust protocol for immune cell isolation from chicken blood and the subsequent cultivation of immune cells is not available. Here, we established a protocol for blood sampling and immune cell isolation and cultivation from chicken blood, which could be applied for the investigation of direct effects of immunomodulating compounds. This protocol, combining different techniques of immune cell isolation, cultivation, and differentiation of distinct immune cell populations, will serve as a potential alternative to animal testing in vivo. By gaining knowledge about the mechanisms of action of immunomodulating compounds, this in vitro model will contribute to promote health and welfare in chicken farming. ABSTRACT: Knowledge about the modes of action of immunomodulating compounds such as pathogens, drugs, or feed additives, e.g., probiotics, gained through controlled but animal-related in vitro systems using primary cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will allow the development of targeted nutrition strategies. Moreover, it could contribute to the prevention of infectious diseases and the usage of antimicrobials, and further promote the health of the animals. However, to our knowledge, a protocol for the isolation of PBMCs with reduced thrombocyte count from chicken blood and subsequent cell culture over several days to assess the effects of immunomodulating compounds is not available. Therefore, we established an optimized protocol for blood sampling and immune cell isolation, culture, and phenotyping for chicken PBMCs. For blood sampling commercial Na–citrate tubes revealed the highest count of vital cells compared to commercial Li–heparin (p < 0.01) and K3EDTA (p < 0.05) tubes. Using combined dextran and ficoll density gradient separation, the thrombocyte count was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) compared to slow-speed centrifugation with subsequent ficoll. For cell culture, the supplementation of RPMI-1640 medium with 10% chicken serum resulted in the lowest relative cell count of thrombocytes compared to fetal calf serum (FCS) (p < 0.05). To validate the ability of the cell culture system to respond to stimuli, concanavalin A (conA) was used as a positive control. The optimized protocol allows the isolation and cultivation of vital PBMCs with reduced thrombocyte count from chicken blood for subsequent investigation of the modes of action of immunomodulating compounds.