Cargando…

The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benka, Valerie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579
_version_ 1784620168417116160
author Benka, Valerie A.
author_facet Benka, Valerie A.
author_sort Benka, Valerie A.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one organization’s creation of an Ethical Review Board and structure for ethical review to help address them. ABSTRACT: To date, independent ethical oversight of many companion animal welfare initiatives has been limited and, in some instances, inadequate. Beyond a blurred line between “innovation” and “research,” the nature of the work conducted in animal welfare projects is often poorly aligned with established institutional ethical review structures, which are designed for research involving humans or research involving animals and are also focused on industry and academic institutions. This commentary details the struggle of one United States-based nonprofit organization to find ethical guidelines and support for conducting non-traditional field-based animal welfare studies, and subsequent experience establishing an Ethical Review Board to evaluate organizational initiatives. The commentary discusses member selection, materials and processes, and lessons and learnings from the creation and use of an Ethical Review Board. Sharing content of the ethical review process, as well as challenges and learnings from it, is intended to support other organizations and individuals seeking to ensure that innovation for animal welfare consistently meets high ethical standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86979792021-12-24 The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats Benka, Valerie A. Animals (Basel) Commentary SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one organization’s creation of an Ethical Review Board and structure for ethical review to help address them. ABSTRACT: To date, independent ethical oversight of many companion animal welfare initiatives has been limited and, in some instances, inadequate. Beyond a blurred line between “innovation” and “research,” the nature of the work conducted in animal welfare projects is often poorly aligned with established institutional ethical review structures, which are designed for research involving humans or research involving animals and are also focused on industry and academic institutions. This commentary details the struggle of one United States-based nonprofit organization to find ethical guidelines and support for conducting non-traditional field-based animal welfare studies, and subsequent experience establishing an Ethical Review Board to evaluate organizational initiatives. The commentary discusses member selection, materials and processes, and lessons and learnings from the creation and use of an Ethical Review Board. Sharing content of the ethical review process, as well as challenges and learnings from it, is intended to support other organizations and individuals seeking to ensure that innovation for animal welfare consistently meets high ethical standards. MDPI 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8697979/ /pubmed/34944354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Benka, Valerie A.
The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title_full The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title_fullStr The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title_full_unstemmed The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title_short The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
title_sort ethics of innovation: ethical decision-making and review for field studies and projects targeting dogs and cats
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579
work_keys_str_mv AT benkavaleriea theethicsofinnovationethicaldecisionmakingandreviewforfieldstudiesandprojectstargetingdogsandcats
AT benkavaleriea ethicsofinnovationethicaldecisionmakingandreviewforfieldstudiesandprojectstargetingdogsandcats