Cargando…
The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579 |
_version_ | 1784620168417116160 |
---|---|
author | Benka, Valerie A. |
author_facet | Benka, Valerie A. |
author_sort | Benka, Valerie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one organization’s creation of an Ethical Review Board and structure for ethical review to help address them. ABSTRACT: To date, independent ethical oversight of many companion animal welfare initiatives has been limited and, in some instances, inadequate. Beyond a blurred line between “innovation” and “research,” the nature of the work conducted in animal welfare projects is often poorly aligned with established institutional ethical review structures, which are designed for research involving humans or research involving animals and are also focused on industry and academic institutions. This commentary details the struggle of one United States-based nonprofit organization to find ethical guidelines and support for conducting non-traditional field-based animal welfare studies, and subsequent experience establishing an Ethical Review Board to evaluate organizational initiatives. The commentary discusses member selection, materials and processes, and lessons and learnings from the creation and use of an Ethical Review Board. Sharing content of the ethical review process, as well as challenges and learnings from it, is intended to support other organizations and individuals seeking to ensure that innovation for animal welfare consistently meets high ethical standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8697979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86979792021-12-24 The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats Benka, Valerie A. Animals (Basel) Commentary SIMPLE SUMMARY: Innovation and research to advance animal welfare, particularly that of companion animal species, can present unique ethical challenges, and there are presently gaps in support and independent oversight structures for ethical decision-making. This commentary details key gaps and one organization’s creation of an Ethical Review Board and structure for ethical review to help address them. ABSTRACT: To date, independent ethical oversight of many companion animal welfare initiatives has been limited and, in some instances, inadequate. Beyond a blurred line between “innovation” and “research,” the nature of the work conducted in animal welfare projects is often poorly aligned with established institutional ethical review structures, which are designed for research involving humans or research involving animals and are also focused on industry and academic institutions. This commentary details the struggle of one United States-based nonprofit organization to find ethical guidelines and support for conducting non-traditional field-based animal welfare studies, and subsequent experience establishing an Ethical Review Board to evaluate organizational initiatives. The commentary discusses member selection, materials and processes, and lessons and learnings from the creation and use of an Ethical Review Board. Sharing content of the ethical review process, as well as challenges and learnings from it, is intended to support other organizations and individuals seeking to ensure that innovation for animal welfare consistently meets high ethical standards. MDPI 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8697979/ /pubmed/34944354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Benka, Valerie A. The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title | The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title_full | The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title_fullStr | The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title_full_unstemmed | The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title_short | The Ethics of Innovation: Ethical Decision-Making and Review for Field Studies and Projects Targeting Dogs and Cats |
title_sort | ethics of innovation: ethical decision-making and review for field studies and projects targeting dogs and cats |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11123579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benkavaleriea theethicsofinnovationethicaldecisionmakingandreviewforfieldstudiesandprojectstargetingdogsandcats AT benkavaleriea ethicsofinnovationethicaldecisionmakingandreviewforfieldstudiesandprojectstargetingdogsandcats |