Cargando…

Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a report concerning planning and actions to provide quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected, and vulnerable areas. South Sudan, the world’s newest country, has encountered both natural and man-made disasters in recent years that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gianaris, Kevin, Atem, Jacob, Chen, Allison P., Chang, Alexander H., Russell, Anna, Hsu, Edbert B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8698219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036333
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3506
_version_ 1784620225142980608
author Gianaris, Kevin
Atem, Jacob
Chen, Allison P.
Chang, Alexander H.
Russell, Anna
Hsu, Edbert B.
author_facet Gianaris, Kevin
Atem, Jacob
Chen, Allison P.
Chang, Alexander H.
Russell, Anna
Hsu, Edbert B.
author_sort Gianaris, Kevin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a report concerning planning and actions to provide quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected, and vulnerable areas. South Sudan, the world’s newest country, has encountered both natural and man-made disasters in recent years that have posed marked challenges to delivery of care. The Southern Sudan Healthcare Organization (SSHCO) operates as a non-governmental organization (NGO) in this setting, delivering and improving healthcare through war, flooding, and infectious outbreaks. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this paper is to highlight the challenges faced in providing care in South Sudan from an NGO perspective and apply the recent WHO guidelines on quality of care to optimize practical implementation. METHOD: Each of the WHO’s eight elements for quality of care in South Sudan were examined in relation to the experience of SSHCO from 2013–2021. Analysis included: 1. summary of the WHO element; 2. examples of successful implementation; 3. barriers to implementation; and 4. recommendations to improve implementation. FINDINGS: The team found that communication and coordination were the most important aspects of improving quality of care in South Sudan. These should be prioritized and include intergovernmental partners, the local and national Ministry of Health (MOH), NGOs, and community stakeholders. Communication and coordination should foster community engagement, improved data collecting and reporting, and sharing of publicly accessible information. Better clinical staff training and governance are also required to ensure the most effective use of limited resources. CONCLUSION: South Sudan faces many barriers to quality of care with communication and coordination identified among the foremost issues. Practical application of the WHO elements of quality of care can assist NGOs in effectively identifying areas for improvement to deliver better quality essential health services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8698219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86982192022-01-13 Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan Gianaris, Kevin Atem, Jacob Chen, Allison P. Chang, Alexander H. Russell, Anna Hsu, Edbert B. Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a report concerning planning and actions to provide quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected, and vulnerable areas. South Sudan, the world’s newest country, has encountered both natural and man-made disasters in recent years that have posed marked challenges to delivery of care. The Southern Sudan Healthcare Organization (SSHCO) operates as a non-governmental organization (NGO) in this setting, delivering and improving healthcare through war, flooding, and infectious outbreaks. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this paper is to highlight the challenges faced in providing care in South Sudan from an NGO perspective and apply the recent WHO guidelines on quality of care to optimize practical implementation. METHOD: Each of the WHO’s eight elements for quality of care in South Sudan were examined in relation to the experience of SSHCO from 2013–2021. Analysis included: 1. summary of the WHO element; 2. examples of successful implementation; 3. barriers to implementation; and 4. recommendations to improve implementation. FINDINGS: The team found that communication and coordination were the most important aspects of improving quality of care in South Sudan. These should be prioritized and include intergovernmental partners, the local and national Ministry of Health (MOH), NGOs, and community stakeholders. Communication and coordination should foster community engagement, improved data collecting and reporting, and sharing of publicly accessible information. Better clinical staff training and governance are also required to ensure the most effective use of limited resources. CONCLUSION: South Sudan faces many barriers to quality of care with communication and coordination identified among the foremost issues. Practical application of the WHO elements of quality of care can assist NGOs in effectively identifying areas for improvement to deliver better quality essential health services. Ubiquity Press 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8698219/ /pubmed/35036333 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3506 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gianaris, Kevin
Atem, Jacob
Chen, Allison P.
Chang, Alexander H.
Russell, Anna
Hsu, Edbert B.
Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title_full Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title_fullStr Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title_full_unstemmed Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title_short Providing Quality of Care in Fragile and Vulnerable Settings: Lessons from South Sudan
title_sort providing quality of care in fragile and vulnerable settings: lessons from south sudan
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8698219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35036333
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3506
work_keys_str_mv AT gianariskevin providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan
AT atemjacob providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan
AT chenallisonp providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan
AT changalexanderh providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan
AT russellanna providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan
AT hsuedbertb providingqualityofcareinfragileandvulnerablesettingslessonsfromsouthsudan