Cargando…

The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure

The aim of this study is to examine the evolution of inequality by focusing on the impacts of the economic structure. The technique of decomposition by income sources is employed to evaluate the contribution of the three major sectors, namely the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors to over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ning, Li, Victor Jing, Cheong, Tsun Se, Zhuang, Delin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8698742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808976
_version_ 1784620349732683776
author Ma, Ning
Li, Victor Jing
Cheong, Tsun Se
Zhuang, Delin
author_facet Ma, Ning
Li, Victor Jing
Cheong, Tsun Se
Zhuang, Delin
author_sort Ma, Ning
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to examine the evolution of inequality by focusing on the impacts of the economic structure. The technique of decomposition by income sources is employed to evaluate the contribution of the three major sectors, namely the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors to overall inequality. The data cover almost all the countries in the world from 2001 to 2017 for a total of 18 years. There are four stages of analysis in this study. The first stage of study is to provide an overall view of the evolutionary trend of global inequality, the second stage focuses on the North-South divide, the third stage determines the impacts of income groups, and the fourth stage investigates the impacts for each region. There are several salient findings: First, global inequality had declined in the study period. Second, the service sector is identified as the largest contributor to global inequality, followed by the industrial sector, while the contribution of the agricultural sector is negligible. For the North-South divide, disparity in the service sector was more marked in the North than in the South. The industrial sector played a major role in the South and contributed more than 40% to overall inequality. For the comparison amongst the income groups, our findings show that the higher the income, the higher the percentage contribution of the service sector (except for the low-income group). Finally, for the comparison across regions, although the contribution of the agricultural sector in most regions are below 1.5%; however, the contribution of the agricultural sector in both Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia is more than 8%. It implies that a lot of people in these regions still rely on the agricultural sector for a living, and the development in the industrial and service sectors in these two regions lagged behind those of the other regions. Our analysis show that the evolution pattern is very different for each region, therefore, it is necessary to take the effects of income and geographical location into consideration in formulating development policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8698742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86987422021-12-24 The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure Ma, Ning Li, Victor Jing Cheong, Tsun Se Zhuang, Delin Front Psychol Psychology The aim of this study is to examine the evolution of inequality by focusing on the impacts of the economic structure. The technique of decomposition by income sources is employed to evaluate the contribution of the three major sectors, namely the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors to overall inequality. The data cover almost all the countries in the world from 2001 to 2017 for a total of 18 years. There are four stages of analysis in this study. The first stage of study is to provide an overall view of the evolutionary trend of global inequality, the second stage focuses on the North-South divide, the third stage determines the impacts of income groups, and the fourth stage investigates the impacts for each region. There are several salient findings: First, global inequality had declined in the study period. Second, the service sector is identified as the largest contributor to global inequality, followed by the industrial sector, while the contribution of the agricultural sector is negligible. For the North-South divide, disparity in the service sector was more marked in the North than in the South. The industrial sector played a major role in the South and contributed more than 40% to overall inequality. For the comparison amongst the income groups, our findings show that the higher the income, the higher the percentage contribution of the service sector (except for the low-income group). Finally, for the comparison across regions, although the contribution of the agricultural sector in most regions are below 1.5%; however, the contribution of the agricultural sector in both Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia is more than 8%. It implies that a lot of people in these regions still rely on the agricultural sector for a living, and the development in the industrial and service sectors in these two regions lagged behind those of the other regions. Our analysis show that the evolution pattern is very different for each region, therefore, it is necessary to take the effects of income and geographical location into consideration in formulating development policies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8698742/ /pubmed/34956028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808976 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ma, Li, Cheong and Zhuang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ma, Ning
Li, Victor Jing
Cheong, Tsun Se
Zhuang, Delin
The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title_full The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title_fullStr The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title_full_unstemmed The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title_short The Evolutionary Trend of Global Inequality: Analyzing the Impacts of Economic Structure
title_sort evolutionary trend of global inequality: analyzing the impacts of economic structure
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8698742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34956028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.808976
work_keys_str_mv AT maning theevolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT livictorjing theevolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT cheongtsunse theevolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT zhuangdelin theevolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT maning evolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT livictorjing evolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT cheongtsunse evolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure
AT zhuangdelin evolutionarytrendofglobalinequalityanalyzingtheimpactsofeconomicstructure