Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer patients and cancer survivors are at risk for malnutrition from both their disease and its treatment. Many cancer survivors use dietary supplementation without informing their doctors. The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence and cost-effectiveness of dietary suppl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaver, Amy L., Tufuor, Theresa A., Nie, Jing, Ekimura, Shauna, Marshall, Keri, Mitmesser, Susan Hazels, Noyes, Katia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246276
_version_ 1784620454552535040
author Shaver, Amy L.
Tufuor, Theresa A.
Nie, Jing
Ekimura, Shauna
Marshall, Keri
Mitmesser, Susan Hazels
Noyes, Katia
author_facet Shaver, Amy L.
Tufuor, Theresa A.
Nie, Jing
Ekimura, Shauna
Marshall, Keri
Mitmesser, Susan Hazels
Noyes, Katia
author_sort Shaver, Amy L.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer patients and cancer survivors are at risk for malnutrition from both their disease and its treatment. Many cancer survivors use dietary supplementation without informing their doctors. The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence and cost-effectiveness of dietary supplementation in a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors in the U.S. by looking at intake and hospitalization records. Adequate nutrition is a cost-effective way to promote well-being More research needs to be carried out so providers can offer the best nutrition to the right patients at the right time. ABSTRACT: Cancer patients are at risk for malnutrition; the aim of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of dietary supplementation in cancer survivors. We estimated prevalence of supplementation, hospitalization rates, quality of life (QOL), cost of care and mortality among cancer survivors. We built a decision analytic model to simulate life-long costs of health care and supplementation and QOL among cancer survivors with and without supplementation. Cost of supplements was derived from national pharmacy databases including single- and multivitamin formularies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to changes in supplementation costs and duration. The study cohort represented the national cancer survivor population (average age 61 years, 85% white, 52% male, and 94% insured). Hospitalization rates for supplement users and non-users were 12% and 21%, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was $4030. Supplementation was associated with an additional 0.48 QALYs (10.26 vs. 9.78) at the incremental cost of $2094 ($236,933 vs. $234,839) over the remaining lifetime of survivors (on average 13 years). Adequate nutrition provides a cost-effective strategy to achieving potentially optimum health. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of specific nutrient doses and supplementation on long-term outcomes per cancer type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8699187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86991872021-12-24 Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors Shaver, Amy L. Tufuor, Theresa A. Nie, Jing Ekimura, Shauna Marshall, Keri Mitmesser, Susan Hazels Noyes, Katia Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Cancer patients and cancer survivors are at risk for malnutrition from both their disease and its treatment. Many cancer survivors use dietary supplementation without informing their doctors. The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence and cost-effectiveness of dietary supplementation in a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors in the U.S. by looking at intake and hospitalization records. Adequate nutrition is a cost-effective way to promote well-being More research needs to be carried out so providers can offer the best nutrition to the right patients at the right time. ABSTRACT: Cancer patients are at risk for malnutrition; the aim of this study was to provide a cost-effectiveness analysis of dietary supplementation in cancer survivors. We estimated prevalence of supplementation, hospitalization rates, quality of life (QOL), cost of care and mortality among cancer survivors. We built a decision analytic model to simulate life-long costs of health care and supplementation and QOL among cancer survivors with and without supplementation. Cost of supplements was derived from national pharmacy databases including single- and multivitamin formularies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the robustness of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to changes in supplementation costs and duration. The study cohort represented the national cancer survivor population (average age 61 years, 85% white, 52% male, and 94% insured). Hospitalization rates for supplement users and non-users were 12% and 21%, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was $4030. Supplementation was associated with an additional 0.48 QALYs (10.26 vs. 9.78) at the incremental cost of $2094 ($236,933 vs. $234,839) over the remaining lifetime of survivors (on average 13 years). Adequate nutrition provides a cost-effective strategy to achieving potentially optimum health. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of specific nutrient doses and supplementation on long-term outcomes per cancer type. MDPI 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8699187/ /pubmed/34944894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246276 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shaver, Amy L.
Tufuor, Theresa A.
Nie, Jing
Ekimura, Shauna
Marshall, Keri
Mitmesser, Susan Hazels
Noyes, Katia
Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrient Supplementation in Cancer Survivors
title_sort cost-effectiveness of nutrient supplementation in cancer survivors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246276
work_keys_str_mv AT shaveramyl costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT tufuortheresaa costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT niejing costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT ekimurashauna costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT marshallkeri costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT mitmessersusanhazels costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors
AT noyeskatia costeffectivenessofnutrientsupplementationincancersurvivors