Cargando…

Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature

Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domarecka, Ewa, Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar, Mutlu, Ahmet, Özgür, Abdulkadir, Smit, Jasper, Olze, Heidi, Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596
_version_ 1784620464342040576
author Domarecka, Ewa
Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar
Mutlu, Ahmet
Özgür, Abdulkadir
Smit, Jasper
Olze, Heidi
Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
author_facet Domarecka, Ewa
Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar
Mutlu, Ahmet
Özgür, Abdulkadir
Smit, Jasper
Olze, Heidi
Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
author_sort Domarecka, Ewa
collection PubMed
description Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies in the outcomes of these studies, some due to different research approaches and others due to different methodologies. Thus, the present work aimed to collect comprehensive information on all factors influencing ABR recordings in rats and compile recommendations on ABR data reporting. A questionnaire with queries about animal husbandry, transfer, handling, and the exact test conditions before, during, and after ABR recordings was sent to 125 researchers who published the relevant studies between 2015 and 2021. Eighteen researchers provided detailed answers on factors related to ABR measurements. Based on the analysis of the returned questionnaires, we identified three domains reflecting animal-, equipment-, and experiment-dependent factors that might influence the ABR outcome, thus requiring reporting in published research. The analysis of survey results led to the compilation of recommendations for reporting ABR outcomes supported by a literature review. Following these recommendations should facilitate comparative and meta-analyses of ABR results provided by various research groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8699229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86992292021-12-24 Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature Domarecka, Ewa Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar Mutlu, Ahmet Özgür, Abdulkadir Smit, Jasper Olze, Heidi Szczepek, Agnieszka J. Brain Sci Article Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies in the outcomes of these studies, some due to different research approaches and others due to different methodologies. Thus, the present work aimed to collect comprehensive information on all factors influencing ABR recordings in rats and compile recommendations on ABR data reporting. A questionnaire with queries about animal husbandry, transfer, handling, and the exact test conditions before, during, and after ABR recordings was sent to 125 researchers who published the relevant studies between 2015 and 2021. Eighteen researchers provided detailed answers on factors related to ABR measurements. Based on the analysis of the returned questionnaires, we identified three domains reflecting animal-, equipment-, and experiment-dependent factors that might influence the ABR outcome, thus requiring reporting in published research. The analysis of survey results led to the compilation of recommendations for reporting ABR outcomes supported by a literature review. Following these recommendations should facilitate comparative and meta-analyses of ABR results provided by various research groups. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8699229/ /pubmed/34942898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Domarecka, Ewa
Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar
Mutlu, Ahmet
Özgür, Abdulkadir
Smit, Jasper
Olze, Heidi
Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title_full Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title_fullStr Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title_full_unstemmed Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title_short Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
title_sort reporting data on auditory brainstem responses (abr) in rats: recommendations based on review of experimental protocols and literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596
work_keys_str_mv AT domareckaewa reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT kalcioglumahmuttayyar reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT mutluahmet reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT ozgurabdulkadir reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT smitjasper reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT olzeheidi reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature
AT szczepekagnieszkaj reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature