Cargando…
Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature
Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596 |
_version_ | 1784620464342040576 |
---|---|
author | Domarecka, Ewa Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar Mutlu, Ahmet Özgür, Abdulkadir Smit, Jasper Olze, Heidi Szczepek, Agnieszka J. |
author_facet | Domarecka, Ewa Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar Mutlu, Ahmet Özgür, Abdulkadir Smit, Jasper Olze, Heidi Szczepek, Agnieszka J. |
author_sort | Domarecka, Ewa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies in the outcomes of these studies, some due to different research approaches and others due to different methodologies. Thus, the present work aimed to collect comprehensive information on all factors influencing ABR recordings in rats and compile recommendations on ABR data reporting. A questionnaire with queries about animal husbandry, transfer, handling, and the exact test conditions before, during, and after ABR recordings was sent to 125 researchers who published the relevant studies between 2015 and 2021. Eighteen researchers provided detailed answers on factors related to ABR measurements. Based on the analysis of the returned questionnaires, we identified three domains reflecting animal-, equipment-, and experiment-dependent factors that might influence the ABR outcome, thus requiring reporting in published research. The analysis of survey results led to the compilation of recommendations for reporting ABR outcomes supported by a literature review. Following these recommendations should facilitate comparative and meta-analyses of ABR results provided by various research groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8699229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86992292021-12-24 Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature Domarecka, Ewa Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar Mutlu, Ahmet Özgür, Abdulkadir Smit, Jasper Olze, Heidi Szczepek, Agnieszka J. Brain Sci Article Research in hearing science is accelerating, and a wealth of data concerning auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in various animal models is published in peer-reviewed journals every year. Recently, we reviewed studies using ABR measurements in tinnitus rat models. We found significant discrepancies in the outcomes of these studies, some due to different research approaches and others due to different methodologies. Thus, the present work aimed to collect comprehensive information on all factors influencing ABR recordings in rats and compile recommendations on ABR data reporting. A questionnaire with queries about animal husbandry, transfer, handling, and the exact test conditions before, during, and after ABR recordings was sent to 125 researchers who published the relevant studies between 2015 and 2021. Eighteen researchers provided detailed answers on factors related to ABR measurements. Based on the analysis of the returned questionnaires, we identified three domains reflecting animal-, equipment-, and experiment-dependent factors that might influence the ABR outcome, thus requiring reporting in published research. The analysis of survey results led to the compilation of recommendations for reporting ABR outcomes supported by a literature review. Following these recommendations should facilitate comparative and meta-analyses of ABR results provided by various research groups. MDPI 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8699229/ /pubmed/34942898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Domarecka, Ewa Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar Mutlu, Ahmet Özgür, Abdulkadir Smit, Jasper Olze, Heidi Szczepek, Agnieszka J. Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title | Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title_full | Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title_fullStr | Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title_short | Reporting Data on Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) in Rats: Recommendations Based on Review of Experimental Protocols and Literature |
title_sort | reporting data on auditory brainstem responses (abr) in rats: recommendations based on review of experimental protocols and literature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domareckaewa reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT kalcioglumahmuttayyar reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT mutluahmet reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT ozgurabdulkadir reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT smitjasper reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT olzeheidi reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature AT szczepekagnieszkaj reportingdataonauditorybrainstemresponsesabrinratsrecommendationsbasedonreviewofexperimentalprotocolsandliterature |