Cargando…
Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection
C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammation biomarker that should be quantified accurately during infections and healing processes. Nanobodies are good candidates to replace conventional antibodies in immunodiagnostics due to their inexpensive production, simple engineering, and the possibility to o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120496 |
_version_ | 1784620531960512512 |
---|---|
author | Oloketuyi, Sandra Bernedo, Robert Christmann, Andreas Borkowska, Justyna Cazzaniga, Giulia Schuchmann, Horst Wilhelm Niedziółka-Jönsson, Joanna Szot-Karpińska, Katarzyna Kolmar, Harald de Marco, Ario |
author_facet | Oloketuyi, Sandra Bernedo, Robert Christmann, Andreas Borkowska, Justyna Cazzaniga, Giulia Schuchmann, Horst Wilhelm Niedziółka-Jönsson, Joanna Szot-Karpińska, Katarzyna Kolmar, Harald de Marco, Ario |
author_sort | Oloketuyi, Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammation biomarker that should be quantified accurately during infections and healing processes. Nanobodies are good candidates to replace conventional antibodies in immunodiagnostics due to their inexpensive production, simple engineering, and the possibility to obtain higher binder density on capture surfaces. Starting from the same pre-immune library, we compared the selection output resulting from two independent panning strategies, one exclusively exploiting the phage display and another in which a first round of phage display was followed by a second round of yeast display. There was a partial output convergence between the two methods, since two clones were identified using both panning protocols but the first provided several further different sequences, whereas the second favored the recovery of many copies of few clones. The isolated anti-CRP nanobodies had affinity in the low nanomolar range and were suitable for ELISA and immunoprecipitation. One of them was fused to SpyTag and exploited in combination with SpyCatcher as the immunocapture element to quantify CRP using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The sensitivity of the biosensor was calculated as low as 0.21 μg/mL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8699515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86995152021-12-24 Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection Oloketuyi, Sandra Bernedo, Robert Christmann, Andreas Borkowska, Justyna Cazzaniga, Giulia Schuchmann, Horst Wilhelm Niedziółka-Jönsson, Joanna Szot-Karpińska, Katarzyna Kolmar, Harald de Marco, Ario Biosensors (Basel) Article C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammation biomarker that should be quantified accurately during infections and healing processes. Nanobodies are good candidates to replace conventional antibodies in immunodiagnostics due to their inexpensive production, simple engineering, and the possibility to obtain higher binder density on capture surfaces. Starting from the same pre-immune library, we compared the selection output resulting from two independent panning strategies, one exclusively exploiting the phage display and another in which a first round of phage display was followed by a second round of yeast display. There was a partial output convergence between the two methods, since two clones were identified using both panning protocols but the first provided several further different sequences, whereas the second favored the recovery of many copies of few clones. The isolated anti-CRP nanobodies had affinity in the low nanomolar range and were suitable for ELISA and immunoprecipitation. One of them was fused to SpyTag and exploited in combination with SpyCatcher as the immunocapture element to quantify CRP using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The sensitivity of the biosensor was calculated as low as 0.21 μg/mL. MDPI 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8699515/ /pubmed/34940253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120496 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Oloketuyi, Sandra Bernedo, Robert Christmann, Andreas Borkowska, Justyna Cazzaniga, Giulia Schuchmann, Horst Wilhelm Niedziółka-Jönsson, Joanna Szot-Karpińska, Katarzyna Kolmar, Harald de Marco, Ario Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title | Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title_full | Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title_fullStr | Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title_short | Native llama Nanobody Library Panning Performed by Phage and Yeast Display Provides Binders Suitable for C-Reactive Protein Detection |
title_sort | native llama nanobody library panning performed by phage and yeast display provides binders suitable for c-reactive protein detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oloketuyisandra nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT bernedorobert nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT christmannandreas nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT borkowskajustyna nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT cazzanigagiulia nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT schuchmannhorstwilhelm nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT niedziołkajonssonjoanna nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT szotkarpinskakatarzyna nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT kolmarharald nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection AT demarcoario nativellamananobodylibrarypanningperformedbyphageandyeastdisplayprovidesbinderssuitableforcreactiveproteindetection |