Cargando…

The Effects of Angiotensin II or Angiotensin 1-7 on Rat Pial Microcirculation during Hypoperfusion and Reperfusion Injury: Role of Redox Stress

Renin–angiotensin systems produce angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7), which are able to induce opposite effects on circulation. This study in vivo assessed the effects induced by Ang II or Ang 1-7 on rat pial microcirculation during hypoperfusion–reperfusion, clarifying the mechan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapi, Dominga, Cammalleri, Maurizio, Dal Monte, Massimo, Di Maro, Martina, Santillo, Mariarosaria, Belfiore, Anna, Nasti, Gilda, Damiano, Simona, Trio, Rossella, Chiurazzi, Martina, De Conno, Barbara, Serao, Nicola, Mondola, Paolo, Colantuoni, Antonio, Guida, Bruna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom11121861
Descripción
Sumario:Renin–angiotensin systems produce angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7), which are able to induce opposite effects on circulation. This study in vivo assessed the effects induced by Ang II or Ang 1-7 on rat pial microcirculation during hypoperfusion–reperfusion, clarifying the mechanisms causing the imbalance between Ang II and Ang 1-7. The fluorescence microscopy was used to quantify the microvascular parameters. Hypoperfusion and reperfusion caused vasoconstriction, disruption of blood–brain barrier, reduction of capillary perfusion and an increase in reactive oxygen species production. Rats treated with Ang II showed exacerbated microvascular damage with stronger vasoconstriction compared to hypoperfused rats, a further increase in leakage, higher decrease in capillary perfusion and marker oxidative stress. Candesartan cilexetil (specific Ang II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) antagonist) administration prior to Ang II prevented the effects induced by Ang II, blunting the hypoperfusion–reperfusion injury. Ang 1-7 or ACE2 activator administration, preserved the pial microcirculation from hypoperfusion–reperfusion damage. These effects of Ang 1-7 were blunted by a Mas (Mas oncogene-encoded protein) receptor antagonist, while Ang II type 2 receptor antagonists did not affect Ang 1-7-induced changes. In conclusion, Ang II and Ang 1-7 triggered different mechanisms through AT(1)R or MAS receptors able to affect cerebral microvascular injury.