Cargando…
Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays
The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for pathogen detection methods that combine low detection limits with rapid results. Despite the significant progress in methods and devices for nucleic acid amplification, immunochemical methods are still preferred for mass testing without spec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120510 |
_version_ | 1784620581557108736 |
---|---|
author | Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. Byzova, Nadezhda A. Zherdev, Anatoly V. Khlebtsov, Nikolai G. Khlebtsov, Boris N. Biketov, Sergey F. Dzantiev, Boris B. |
author_facet | Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. Byzova, Nadezhda A. Zherdev, Anatoly V. Khlebtsov, Nikolai G. Khlebtsov, Boris N. Biketov, Sergey F. Dzantiev, Boris B. |
author_sort | Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for pathogen detection methods that combine low detection limits with rapid results. Despite the significant progress in methods and devices for nucleic acid amplification, immunochemical methods are still preferred for mass testing without specialized laboratories and highly qualified personnel. The most widely used immunoassays are microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with photometric detection and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) with visual results assessment. However, the disadvantage of ELISA is its considerable duration, and that of LFIA is its low sensitivity. In this study, the modified LFIA of a specific antigen of the causative agent of COVID-19, spike receptor-binding domain, was developed and characterized. This modified LFIA includes the use of gold nanoparticles with immobilized antibodies and 4-mercaptobenzoic acid as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanotag and registration of the nanotag binding by SERS spectrometry. To enhance the sensitivity of LFIA-SERS analysis, we determined the optimal compositions of SERS nanotags and membranes used in LFIA. For benchmark comparison, ELISA and conventional colorimetric LFIA were used with the same immune reagents. The proposed method combines a low detection limit of 0.1 ng/mL (at 0.4 ng/mL for ELISA and 1 ng/mL for qualitative LFIA) with a short assay time equal to 20 min (at 3.5 h for ELISA and 15 min for LFIA). The results obtained demonstrate the promise of using the SERS effects in membrane immuno-analytical systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8699720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86997202021-12-24 Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. Byzova, Nadezhda A. Zherdev, Anatoly V. Khlebtsov, Nikolai G. Khlebtsov, Boris N. Biketov, Sergey F. Dzantiev, Boris B. Biosensors (Basel) Article The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for pathogen detection methods that combine low detection limits with rapid results. Despite the significant progress in methods and devices for nucleic acid amplification, immunochemical methods are still preferred for mass testing without specialized laboratories and highly qualified personnel. The most widely used immunoassays are microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with photometric detection and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) with visual results assessment. However, the disadvantage of ELISA is its considerable duration, and that of LFIA is its low sensitivity. In this study, the modified LFIA of a specific antigen of the causative agent of COVID-19, spike receptor-binding domain, was developed and characterized. This modified LFIA includes the use of gold nanoparticles with immobilized antibodies and 4-mercaptobenzoic acid as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanotag and registration of the nanotag binding by SERS spectrometry. To enhance the sensitivity of LFIA-SERS analysis, we determined the optimal compositions of SERS nanotags and membranes used in LFIA. For benchmark comparison, ELISA and conventional colorimetric LFIA were used with the same immune reagents. The proposed method combines a low detection limit of 0.1 ng/mL (at 0.4 ng/mL for ELISA and 1 ng/mL for qualitative LFIA) with a short assay time equal to 20 min (at 3.5 h for ELISA and 15 min for LFIA). The results obtained demonstrate the promise of using the SERS effects in membrane immuno-analytical systems. MDPI 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8699720/ /pubmed/34940267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120510 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. Byzova, Nadezhda A. Zherdev, Anatoly V. Khlebtsov, Nikolai G. Khlebtsov, Boris N. Biketov, Sergey F. Dzantiev, Boris B. Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title | Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title_full | Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title_fullStr | Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title_full_unstemmed | Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title_short | Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays |
title_sort | lateral flow immunoassay of sars-cov-2 antigen with sers-based registration: development and comparison with traditional immunoassays |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios11120510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serebrennikovakseniyav lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT byzovanadezhdaa lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT zherdevanatolyv lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT khlebtsovnikolaig lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT khlebtsovborisn lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT biketovsergeyf lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays AT dzantievborisb lateralflowimmunoassayofsarscov2antigenwithsersbasedregistrationdevelopmentandcomparisonwithtraditionalimmunoassays |