Cargando…
Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades transmit signals from extracellular stimuli to a variety of distinct cellular processes. The MAPKKs in each cascade specifically phosphorylate and activate their cognate MAPKs, indicating that this step funnels various signals into a seemingly lin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10123466 |
_version_ | 1784620611209789440 |
---|---|
author | Maik-Rachline, Galia Wortzel, Inbal Seger, Rony |
author_facet | Maik-Rachline, Galia Wortzel, Inbal Seger, Rony |
author_sort | Maik-Rachline, Galia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades transmit signals from extracellular stimuli to a variety of distinct cellular processes. The MAPKKs in each cascade specifically phosphorylate and activate their cognate MAPKs, indicating that this step funnels various signals into a seemingly linear pathway. Still, the effects of these cascades vary significantly, depending on the identity of the extracellular signals, which gives rise to proper outcomes. Therefore, it is clear that the specificity of the signals transmitted through the cascades is tightly regulated in order to secure the desired cell fate. Indeed, many regulatory components or processes that extend the specificity of the cascades have been identified. Here, we focus on a less discussed mechanism, that is, the role of distinct components in each tier of the cascade in extending the signaling specificity. We cover the role of distinct genes, and the alternatively spliced isoforms of MAPKKs and MAPKs, in the signaling specificity. The alternatively spliced MEK1b and ERK1c, which form an independent signaling route, are used as the main example. Unlike MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, this route’s functions are limited, including mainly the regulation of mitotic Golgi fragmentation. The unique roles of the alternatively spliced isoforms indicate that these components play an essential role in determining the proper cell fate in response to distinct stimulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8699841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86998412021-12-24 Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity Maik-Rachline, Galia Wortzel, Inbal Seger, Rony Cells Review The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades transmit signals from extracellular stimuli to a variety of distinct cellular processes. The MAPKKs in each cascade specifically phosphorylate and activate their cognate MAPKs, indicating that this step funnels various signals into a seemingly linear pathway. Still, the effects of these cascades vary significantly, depending on the identity of the extracellular signals, which gives rise to proper outcomes. Therefore, it is clear that the specificity of the signals transmitted through the cascades is tightly regulated in order to secure the desired cell fate. Indeed, many regulatory components or processes that extend the specificity of the cascades have been identified. Here, we focus on a less discussed mechanism, that is, the role of distinct components in each tier of the cascade in extending the signaling specificity. We cover the role of distinct genes, and the alternatively spliced isoforms of MAPKKs and MAPKs, in the signaling specificity. The alternatively spliced MEK1b and ERK1c, which form an independent signaling route, are used as the main example. Unlike MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, this route’s functions are limited, including mainly the regulation of mitotic Golgi fragmentation. The unique roles of the alternatively spliced isoforms indicate that these components play an essential role in determining the proper cell fate in response to distinct stimulations. MDPI 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8699841/ /pubmed/34943973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10123466 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Maik-Rachline, Galia Wortzel, Inbal Seger, Rony Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title | Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title_full | Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title_fullStr | Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title_short | Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity |
title_sort | alternative splicing of mapks in the regulation of signaling specificity |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10123466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maikrachlinegalia alternativesplicingofmapksintheregulationofsignalingspecificity AT wortzelinbal alternativesplicingofmapksintheregulationofsignalingspecificity AT segerrony alternativesplicingofmapksintheregulationofsignalingspecificity |