Cargando…
Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432 |
_version_ | 1784620618982883328 |
---|---|
author | Giuliani, Meredith Elana Giannopoulos, Eleni Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna Broadhurst, Michaela O’Sullivan, Brian Tittenbrun, Zuzanna Johnson, Sonali Brierley, James |
author_facet | Giuliani, Meredith Elana Giannopoulos, Eleni Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna Broadhurst, Michaela O’Sullivan, Brian Tittenbrun, Zuzanna Johnson, Sonali Brierley, James |
author_sort | Giuliani, Meredith Elana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives on the utility and application of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in cancer control programmes. A qualitative phenomenology approach using expert interviews was taken to derive a rich description of the current state and future outlook of cancer prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. Individuals with expertise in this work and from various regions and institutions were invited to take part in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Four areas related to infrastructure and funding challenges were identified by participants, including (1) data collection and access; (2) variability in data reporting, coding, and definitions; (3) limited coordination among databases; and (4) conceptualization and prioritization of meaningful prognostic factors and outcomes. Two areas were identified regarding important future priorities for cancer control: (1) global investment and intention in cancer surveillance and (2) data governance and exchange globally. Participants emphasized the need for better global collection of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes data and support for standardized data collection and data exchange practices by cancer registries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8699872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86998722021-12-24 Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control Giuliani, Meredith Elana Giannopoulos, Eleni Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna Broadhurst, Michaela O’Sullivan, Brian Tittenbrun, Zuzanna Johnson, Sonali Brierley, James Curr Oncol Article Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives on the utility and application of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in cancer control programmes. A qualitative phenomenology approach using expert interviews was taken to derive a rich description of the current state and future outlook of cancer prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. Individuals with expertise in this work and from various regions and institutions were invited to take part in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Four areas related to infrastructure and funding challenges were identified by participants, including (1) data collection and access; (2) variability in data reporting, coding, and definitions; (3) limited coordination among databases; and (4) conceptualization and prioritization of meaningful prognostic factors and outcomes. Two areas were identified regarding important future priorities for cancer control: (1) global investment and intention in cancer surveillance and (2) data governance and exchange globally. Participants emphasized the need for better global collection of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes data and support for standardized data collection and data exchange practices by cancer registries. MDPI 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8699872/ /pubmed/34940071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Giuliani, Meredith Elana Giannopoulos, Eleni Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna Broadhurst, Michaela O’Sullivan, Brian Tittenbrun, Zuzanna Johnson, Sonali Brierley, James Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title | Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title_full | Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title_fullStr | Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title_short | Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control |
title_sort | examining the landscape of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for cancer control |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giulianimeredithelana examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT giannopouloseleni examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT gospodarowiczmarykrystyna examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT broadhurstmichaela examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT osullivanbrian examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT tittenbrunzuzanna examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT johnsonsonali examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol AT brierleyjames examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol |