Cargando…

Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control

Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giuliani, Meredith Elana, Giannopoulos, Eleni, Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna, Broadhurst, Michaela, O’Sullivan, Brian, Tittenbrun, Zuzanna, Johnson, Sonali, Brierley, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432
_version_ 1784620618982883328
author Giuliani, Meredith Elana
Giannopoulos, Eleni
Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna
Broadhurst, Michaela
O’Sullivan, Brian
Tittenbrun, Zuzanna
Johnson, Sonali
Brierley, James
author_facet Giuliani, Meredith Elana
Giannopoulos, Eleni
Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna
Broadhurst, Michaela
O’Sullivan, Brian
Tittenbrun, Zuzanna
Johnson, Sonali
Brierley, James
author_sort Giuliani, Meredith Elana
collection PubMed
description Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives on the utility and application of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in cancer control programmes. A qualitative phenomenology approach using expert interviews was taken to derive a rich description of the current state and future outlook of cancer prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. Individuals with expertise in this work and from various regions and institutions were invited to take part in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Four areas related to infrastructure and funding challenges were identified by participants, including (1) data collection and access; (2) variability in data reporting, coding, and definitions; (3) limited coordination among databases; and (4) conceptualization and prioritization of meaningful prognostic factors and outcomes. Two areas were identified regarding important future priorities for cancer control: (1) global investment and intention in cancer surveillance and (2) data governance and exchange globally. Participants emphasized the need for better global collection of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes data and support for standardized data collection and data exchange practices by cancer registries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8699872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86998722021-12-24 Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control Giuliani, Meredith Elana Giannopoulos, Eleni Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna Broadhurst, Michaela O’Sullivan, Brian Tittenbrun, Zuzanna Johnson, Sonali Brierley, James Curr Oncol Article Prognostic factors have important utility in various aspects of cancer surveillance, including research, patient care, and cancer control programmes. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the collection of prognostic factors and outcomes data globally. This study aimed to investigate perspectives on the utility and application of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in cancer control programmes. A qualitative phenomenology approach using expert interviews was taken to derive a rich description of the current state and future outlook of cancer prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. Individuals with expertise in this work and from various regions and institutions were invited to take part in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Four areas related to infrastructure and funding challenges were identified by participants, including (1) data collection and access; (2) variability in data reporting, coding, and definitions; (3) limited coordination among databases; and (4) conceptualization and prioritization of meaningful prognostic factors and outcomes. Two areas were identified regarding important future priorities for cancer control: (1) global investment and intention in cancer surveillance and (2) data governance and exchange globally. Participants emphasized the need for better global collection of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes data and support for standardized data collection and data exchange practices by cancer registries. MDPI 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8699872/ /pubmed/34940071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giuliani, Meredith Elana
Giannopoulos, Eleni
Gospodarowicz, Mary Krystyna
Broadhurst, Michaela
O’Sullivan, Brian
Tittenbrun, Zuzanna
Johnson, Sonali
Brierley, James
Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title_full Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title_fullStr Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title_short Examining the Landscape of Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes for Cancer Control
title_sort examining the landscape of prognostic factors and clinical outcomes for cancer control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8699872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060432
work_keys_str_mv AT giulianimeredithelana examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT giannopouloseleni examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT gospodarowiczmarykrystyna examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT broadhurstmichaela examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT osullivanbrian examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT tittenbrunzuzanna examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT johnsonsonali examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol
AT brierleyjames examiningthelandscapeofprognosticfactorsandclinicaloutcomesforcancercontrol