Cargando…

Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection

Thanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Lan, Charline, Dinh, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23121690
_version_ 1784620658614861824
author Le Lan, Charline
Dinh, Laurent
author_facet Le Lan, Charline
Dinh, Laurent
author_sort Le Lan, Charline
collection PubMed
description Thanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with the expectations these proposed applications suggest. In this paper, we take a closer look at the behavior of distribution densities through the lens of reparametrization and show that these quantities carry less meaningful information than previously thought, beyond estimation issues or the curse of dimensionality. We conclude that the use of these likelihoods for anomaly detection relies on strong and implicit hypotheses, and highlight the necessity of explicitly formulating these assumptions for reliable anomaly detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87000342021-12-24 Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection Le Lan, Charline Dinh, Laurent Entropy (Basel) Article Thanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with the expectations these proposed applications suggest. In this paper, we take a closer look at the behavior of distribution densities through the lens of reparametrization and show that these quantities carry less meaningful information than previously thought, beyond estimation issues or the curse of dimensionality. We conclude that the use of these likelihoods for anomaly detection relies on strong and implicit hypotheses, and highlight the necessity of explicitly formulating these assumptions for reliable anomaly detection. MDPI 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8700034/ /pubmed/34945996 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23121690 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Le Lan, Charline
Dinh, Laurent
Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_full Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_fullStr Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_full_unstemmed Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_short Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_sort perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945996
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23121690
work_keys_str_mv AT lelancharline perfectdensitymodelscannotguaranteeanomalydetection
AT dinhlaurent perfectdensitymodelscannotguaranteeanomalydetection