Cargando…
Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens
Pen enrichment for broiler chickens is one of the potential strategies to stimulate locomotion and consequently contribute to better leg health and welfare. This study was designed to evaluate effects of using a plethora of pen enrichments (barrier perches, angular ramps, horizontal platforms, large...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254462 |
_version_ | 1784620661534097408 |
---|---|
author | Güz, Bahadır Can de Jong, Ingrid C. Da Silva, Carol Souza Veldkamp, Fleur Kemp, Bas Molenaar, Roos van den Brand, Henry |
author_facet | Güz, Bahadır Can de Jong, Ingrid C. Da Silva, Carol Souza Veldkamp, Fleur Kemp, Bas Molenaar, Roos van den Brand, Henry |
author_sort | Güz, Bahadır Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pen enrichment for broiler chickens is one of the potential strategies to stimulate locomotion and consequently contribute to better leg health and welfare. This study was designed to evaluate effects of using a plethora of pen enrichments (barrier perches, angular ramps, horizontal platforms, large distance between feed and water and providing live Black Soldier fly larvae in a dustbathing area) on tibia characteristics, locomotion, leg health and home pen behaviour of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens. The experiment was set up as a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement with a total of 840 male broiler chickens in a complete randomized design (7 pens per treatment and 30 chickens per pen) with the following treatments: 1) pen enrichment (enriched pen or non-enriched pen); 2) broiler strain (fast-growing Ross 308 or slower-growing Hubbard JA 757). Home pen behaviour and use of enrichment were observed. At approximately 1400 and 2200 g body weight, two chickens per pen were randomly selected and slaughtered, to investigate tibia morphological, biophysical and mechanical characteristics and leg health. Pen enrichment positively affected tibia biophysical characteristics, e.g., osseous volume (Δ = 1.8 cm(3), P = 0.003), total volume (Δ = 1.4 cm(3), P = 0.03) and volume fraction (Δ = 0.02%, P = 0.002), in both fast and slower-growing chickens, suggesting that pen enrichment particularly affects ossification and mineralization mechanisms. Accordingly, locomotion and active behaviours were positively influenced by pen enrichment. However, pen enrichment resulted in lower body weight gain in both strains, which might be due to higher activity or lower feed intake as a result of difficulties of crossing the barrier perches. Regarding the strain, slower-growing chickens showed consistently more advanced tibia characteristics and more active behaviour than fast-growing chickens. It can be concluded that pen enrichment may lead to more activity and better bone development in both fast and slower-growing chickens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8700046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87000462021-12-24 Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens Güz, Bahadır Can de Jong, Ingrid C. Da Silva, Carol Souza Veldkamp, Fleur Kemp, Bas Molenaar, Roos van den Brand, Henry PLoS One Research Article Pen enrichment for broiler chickens is one of the potential strategies to stimulate locomotion and consequently contribute to better leg health and welfare. This study was designed to evaluate effects of using a plethora of pen enrichments (barrier perches, angular ramps, horizontal platforms, large distance between feed and water and providing live Black Soldier fly larvae in a dustbathing area) on tibia characteristics, locomotion, leg health and home pen behaviour of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens. The experiment was set up as a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement with a total of 840 male broiler chickens in a complete randomized design (7 pens per treatment and 30 chickens per pen) with the following treatments: 1) pen enrichment (enriched pen or non-enriched pen); 2) broiler strain (fast-growing Ross 308 or slower-growing Hubbard JA 757). Home pen behaviour and use of enrichment were observed. At approximately 1400 and 2200 g body weight, two chickens per pen were randomly selected and slaughtered, to investigate tibia morphological, biophysical and mechanical characteristics and leg health. Pen enrichment positively affected tibia biophysical characteristics, e.g., osseous volume (Δ = 1.8 cm(3), P = 0.003), total volume (Δ = 1.4 cm(3), P = 0.03) and volume fraction (Δ = 0.02%, P = 0.002), in both fast and slower-growing chickens, suggesting that pen enrichment particularly affects ossification and mineralization mechanisms. Accordingly, locomotion and active behaviours were positively influenced by pen enrichment. However, pen enrichment resulted in lower body weight gain in both strains, which might be due to higher activity or lower feed intake as a result of difficulties of crossing the barrier perches. Regarding the strain, slower-growing chickens showed consistently more advanced tibia characteristics and more active behaviour than fast-growing chickens. It can be concluded that pen enrichment may lead to more activity and better bone development in both fast and slower-growing chickens. Public Library of Science 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8700046/ /pubmed/34941896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254462 Text en © 2021 Güz et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Güz, Bahadır Can de Jong, Ingrid C. Da Silva, Carol Souza Veldkamp, Fleur Kemp, Bas Molenaar, Roos van den Brand, Henry Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title | Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title_full | Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title_fullStr | Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title_short | Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
title_sort | effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guzbahadırcan effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT dejongingridc effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT dasilvacarolsouza effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT veldkampfleur effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT kempbas effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT molenaarroos effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens AT vandenbrandhenry effectsofpenenrichmentonleghealthoffastandslowergrowingbroilerchickens |