Cargando…
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435 |
_version_ | 1784620706130034688 |
---|---|
author | Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Liang, Vivian Cooley, Kieran Guerin, Christilynn Psihogios, Athanasios Papadogianis, Peter |
author_facet | Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Liang, Vivian Cooley, Kieran Guerin, Christilynn Psihogios, Athanasios Papadogianis, Peter |
author_sort | Cogo, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs’ (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI: 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI: 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias. Conclusions: This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that “probiotics” are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8700227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87002272021-12-24 Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Liang, Vivian Cooley, Kieran Guerin, Christilynn Psihogios, Athanasios Papadogianis, Peter Curr Oncol Systematic Review Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs’ (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI: 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI: 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias. Conclusions: This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that “probiotics” are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein. MDPI 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8700227/ /pubmed/34940074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Liang, Vivian Cooley, Kieran Guerin, Christilynn Psihogios, Athanasios Papadogianis, Peter Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title | Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title_full | Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title_fullStr | Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title_short | Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations |
title_sort | probiotics evaluation in oncological surgery: a systematic review of 36 randomized controlled trials assessing 21 diverse formulations |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cogoelise probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT elsayedmohamed probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT liangvivian probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT cooleykieran probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT guerinchristilynn probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT psihogiosathanasios probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations AT papadogianispeter probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations |