Cargando…

Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations

Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cogo, Elise, Elsayed, Mohamed, Liang, Vivian, Cooley, Kieran, Guerin, Christilynn, Psihogios, Athanasios, Papadogianis, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435
_version_ 1784620706130034688
author Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Liang, Vivian
Cooley, Kieran
Guerin, Christilynn
Psihogios, Athanasios
Papadogianis, Peter
author_facet Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Liang, Vivian
Cooley, Kieran
Guerin, Christilynn
Psihogios, Athanasios
Papadogianis, Peter
author_sort Cogo, Elise
collection PubMed
description Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs’ (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI: 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI: 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias. Conclusions: This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that “probiotics” are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8700227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87002272021-12-24 Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations Cogo, Elise Elsayed, Mohamed Liang, Vivian Cooley, Kieran Guerin, Christilynn Psihogios, Athanasios Papadogianis, Peter Curr Oncol Systematic Review Background: Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery. Methods: Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168). Results: 36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs’ (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI: 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI: 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias. Conclusions: This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that “probiotics” are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein. MDPI 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8700227/ /pubmed/34940074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Cogo, Elise
Elsayed, Mohamed
Liang, Vivian
Cooley, Kieran
Guerin, Christilynn
Psihogios, Athanasios
Papadogianis, Peter
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title_full Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title_fullStr Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title_short Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations
title_sort probiotics evaluation in oncological surgery: a systematic review of 36 randomized controlled trials assessing 21 diverse formulations
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34940074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28060435
work_keys_str_mv AT cogoelise probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT elsayedmohamed probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT liangvivian probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT cooleykieran probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT guerinchristilynn probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT psihogiosathanasios probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations
AT papadogianispeter probioticsevaluationinoncologicalsurgeryasystematicreviewof36randomizedcontrolledtrialsassessing21diverseformulations