Cargando…
Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The primary methods for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An ultrasound is performed between the 1st trimester and the 28th week of pregnancy and it is reported to be used as a diagnostic method alone or in combination with MRI. So far, an inter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122235 |
_version_ | 1784620712268398592 |
---|---|
author | Ruzzini, Laura De Salvatore, Sergio Longo, Umile Giuseppe Marino, Martina Greco, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Costici, Pier Francesco Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Ruzzini, Laura De Salvatore, Sergio Longo, Umile Giuseppe Marino, Martina Greco, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Costici, Pier Francesco Denaro, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Ruzzini, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary methods for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An ultrasound is performed between the 1st trimester and the 28th week of pregnancy and it is reported to be used as a diagnostic method alone or in combination with MRI. So far, an international consensus on the most effective screening method has not been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to establish the most effective and reliable exam for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. The literature search was conducted using a PIOS-approach from May 2021 to June 2021. Studies reporting cases of prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot made through US and MRI conducted from January 2010 to June 2021 were included in the study and reviewed by 2 authors. The 23 selected studies included 2318 patients. A total of 11 of the studies included details on the accuracy, while the rest were used to obtain information about the primary methodology utilized. In all the selected studies, US was used as the primary diagnostic instrument. Thirteen of the studies used the US exclusively, while three used MRI in addition to US and seven performed karyotyping after US diagnosis. The US has been shown to be the instrument of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. International guidelines for an ultrasonography classification of congenital clubfoot are required to reduce the inter-variability accuracy of this procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8700252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87002522021-12-24 Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ruzzini, Laura De Salvatore, Sergio Longo, Umile Giuseppe Marino, Martina Greco, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Costici, Pier Francesco Denaro, Vincenzo Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review The primary methods for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An ultrasound is performed between the 1st trimester and the 28th week of pregnancy and it is reported to be used as a diagnostic method alone or in combination with MRI. So far, an international consensus on the most effective screening method has not been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to establish the most effective and reliable exam for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. The literature search was conducted using a PIOS-approach from May 2021 to June 2021. Studies reporting cases of prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot made through US and MRI conducted from January 2010 to June 2021 were included in the study and reviewed by 2 authors. The 23 selected studies included 2318 patients. A total of 11 of the studies included details on the accuracy, while the rest were used to obtain information about the primary methodology utilized. In all the selected studies, US was used as the primary diagnostic instrument. Thirteen of the studies used the US exclusively, while three used MRI in addition to US and seven performed karyotyping after US diagnosis. The US has been shown to be the instrument of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. International guidelines for an ultrasonography classification of congenital clubfoot are required to reduce the inter-variability accuracy of this procedure. MDPI 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8700252/ /pubmed/34943470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122235 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ruzzini, Laura De Salvatore, Sergio Longo, Umile Giuseppe Marino, Martina Greco, Alessandra Piergentili, Ilaria Costici, Pier Francesco Denaro, Vincenzo Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Prenatal Diagnosis of Clubfoot: Where Are We Now? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prenatal diagnosis of clubfoot: where are we now? systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8700252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34943470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruzzinilaura prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT desalvatoresergio prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT longoumilegiuseppe prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marinomartina prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT grecoalessandra prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT piergentiliilaria prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT costicipierfrancesco prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT denarovincenzo prenataldiagnosisofclubfootwherearewenowsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |